Who was no, and who was yes…

Posted by PP at the SDWC
February 2, 2010
No Gravatar

SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 1

A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION, Opposing the government takeover of health care as currently proposed by Congress and encouraging preservation of states’ rights regarding health care regulation.

The question being on Sen. Brown’s motion that SCR 1 be adopted.

    And the roll being called:

    Yeas 22, Nays 10, Excused 3, Absent 0

    Yeas:
Abdallah; Adelstein; Brown; Dempster; Fryslie; Gant; Garnos; Gray; Hansen (Tom); Haverly; Heidepriem; Howie; Hunhoff (Jean); Knudson; Maher; Nelson; Novstrup (Al); Olson (Russell); Rhoden; Schmidt; Tieszen; Vehle

    Nays:
Bartling; Gillespie; Hanson (Gary); Hundstad; Jerstad; Kloucek; Merchant; Nesselhuf; Peterson; Turbak Berry

    Excused:
Ahlers; Bradford; Miles

Wow. A couple of blue spots in a sea of Red State protest against Obamacare.

Thanks to Ryan Maher and Scott Heidepreim for helping the Republican caucus stand against Obama’s reckless plan to bankrupt the country.

BOOKMARK IT:
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • blogmarks
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Linkter
  • YahooMyWeb
  • BlinkList
  • Furl

If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments
Comment by Anonymous on February 3, 2010 @ 1:17 am

So is that Julie Bartling lady planning on being a fiscal conservative if she becomes state auditor like she plans?

Sorry Julie Bartling I just don’t trust blue dog dems anymore to handle taxpayer money. A blue dog is a fiscal conservative right? Right.

Comment by Anonymous on February 3, 2010 @ 1:18 am

Looks like she doesn’t have a problem with Obama Care.

Comment by feasantNo Gravatar on February 3, 2010 @ 9:07 am

She must be the tax and spend democrat everyone is nervous about.

Comment by upset with Bartling on February 3, 2010 @ 1:39 pm

How is she planning to relate this to an electorate that is totally against ObamaCare? Last I checked only 25% of South Dakotans supported Obama Care.

Comment by John on February 3, 2010 @ 7:58 pm

PP said: “…stand against Obama’s reckless plan to bankrupt the country.”

PP, normally I think you’re a pretty rational guy, but lately it’s like your uber-conservatism has disolved all your brain cells.

Yes, obviously the only reason President Obama wanted to reform this country’s health care industry and health insurance industry is because he wants to bankrupt the country. There couldn’t be any other reason for his wanting to do health reform. It can’t be because he might want to help the people currently suffering from the inadequacies of the current system. No, definately not! (Note the blatant sarcasm.)

Thankfully this is just a resolution and doesn’t force those South Dakotans without health insurance to miss out on the benefits when HCR finally passes.

Comment by pickles on February 4, 2010 @ 12:08 am

I’m dissapointed in Bartling.

Leave a comment