Help me tell the IM10 Story
Like the first post in a series how Initiated Measure 10 would disenfranchise the people promoting it? Well, then help me tell their story.
Are you aware whether the people promoting & supporting initiated measure 10 have an immediate family member involved in government? When I talk about immediate family member, I mean….
(5) “Immediate family member,” includes any spouse, child, spouse’s child, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, parent, sibling, grandparent, grandchild, stepbrother, stepsister, stepparent, parent-in-law, brother in- law, sister-in-law, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, guardian, and domestic partner;
..and those people are involved in any level of government – city, school, county, state or any other tax collecting entity? Or are you aware of any IM10 promoter who has a person in a similar capacity involved in a business which provides a government contracted service?
THEN SEND ME THEIR NAME!
Why? I’ll do the digging into the government/contract relationship, and just like with the tale on how IM10 will impact the Sibson family, I’ll tell the story of how more good people will be punished by a poorly written measure.
Just e-mail me here with the information.
Because it’s not about paranoid big government conspiracy theories as the SDCAC, and open and clean government people would have you believe.
It’s about how Initiated Measure 10 will limit the rights of good people. It’s about people like you and me.
If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Comments
No comments yet.
Leave a comment