Press Release: Rounds Delivers Maiden Speech on Senate Floor

RoundsPressHeader

Rounds Delivers Maiden Speech on Senate Floor
“It’s time to end regulation without representation.”

WASHINGTON—U.S. Senator Mike Rounds (R-S.D., today delivered his maiden speech on the Senate floor to discuss the bipartisan RESTORE Resolution, which seeks to free Americans from overregulation. RESTORE would establish a Joint Select Committee to conduct a comprehensive review of rules enacted by federal agencies and analyze the feasibility and options for creating a rules review process in congress. Details are available HERE.

Full Video of Rounds’ Floor Speech:

Remarks as Prepared for Delivery:

Madam President, I rise today, for the first time speaking in this chamber, to discuss the future of our great nation.

How truly fortunate we are to live in the greatest country in the world.

We are protected by the best military that has ever existed, and that in turn allows us to live freely here at home to focus on our God-given rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

In my home state of South Dakota, we cherish these rights.

We have the opportunity to make our dreams come true because we have these rights, and because we have a common-sense value system to guide us.

When I was elected, I promised to bring South Dakota common sense to Washington and to work to solve problems for the good of every South Dakotan and every American.

But, unfortunately Madam President, when I travel back home, I continue to hear from my fellow South Dakotans about the federal government infringing on these rights and values.

You see, our great nation has been bogged down in recent years with what I believe is one of the greatest hindrances to job growth and economic productivity.

And that is the overregulation of our citizens.

Madam President, overregulation is not a Democrat or Republican issue; it’s an issue that affects every one of us.

But I believe it’s a challenge that we can solve through cooperation and perseverance.

It doesn’t matter if you’re talking about a doctor, a small business owner, a farmer or a rancher; overregulation has affected every sector of our society.

The regulatory burden on this country is nearly two trillion dollars annually, and this is in addition to the tax burden already placed on Americans.

That regulatory burden is larger than Canada’s entire economy.
In fact, this cost to comply with federal regulations is larger than the entire G-D-P of all but only 8 other countries in the world.

Even more staggering, just a few years ago, we surpassed 1 million federal regulations in America. One million.

Regulations are stifling economic growth and innovation and hurting the future of this country by crushing the can-do American spirit that founded our nation, settled the West, won two world wars and put a man on the moon.

And every year, more than 3,500 new federal regulations are added.
This just doesn’t make sense and it’s certainly not South Dakota common sense

What alarms me is not only the volume of regulations being thrust upon our citizens, but also the process for creating them.
The purpose of Congress is to be the voice of the people when making laws.

Unfortunately, the voice of the people in the rulemaking process has been cut out, and replaced by unelected government bureaucrats who think they know better than the farmer or scientist or the entrepreneur.

Our founders recognized the need for making laws, granting the power to create laws to Congress; and only Congress.
They meant that process to be difficult so that our government wouldn’t overburden its citizens and restrict their freedom; freedom they had just fought so hard to obtain.

Through Congress, every citizen should have a voice.

But, unfortunately, Madam President, that is not what is happening today.
Our founding fathers created 3 branches of government with checks and balances for each.

They could never have imagined that we would have a regulatory process in place today where unelected bureaucrats would both write and have the final approval of the rules and regulations under which the people must live.

This regulatory regime – which is responsible for the 3,500 new rules each year – has essentially become a fourth branch of government and a de-facto legislative body.

The problem is exacerbated by the fact that these bureaucrats in Washington have this misperception that they know how to run our lives better than we do.

While working as a business owner, a state legislator, as a governor and now a United States Senator, I’ve seen just how detrimental this “Washington knows best” mentality is on the daily lives of South Dakotans and Americans.

Many of my friends – on both sides of the aisle – have come to the Senate floor in recent weeks and months with some great ideas and legislation to limit, stop, repeal or remove some of the worst regulations currently on the books.

I applaud them for these efforts, many of which I also support.

And I look forward to working with the Senior Senator from South Dakota, my friend Senator John Thune, as well as anyone who is willing to work with me to remove these burdens that are stunting American greatness and bring a little South Dakota common sense back to our regulatory environment.

The regulatory system has run amuck.

Too often, Madam President, burdensome, costly and intrusive regulations are crafted by bureaucrats at the highest level of government, behind closed doors, with little input from everyday Americans who disproportionately feel the effects of these one-size fits-all policies.

It is regulation without representation, and it is wrong.

The American people are being squeezed out, their voice falling on deaf ears in Washington.

Small businesses, which drive our economy and create the majority of jobs in America, are especially hurt by overregulation because they, too, have to hire lawyers and employees to comply with these rules.

This takes away capitol that could be used to hire new production employees and expand their business.

People in my home state of South Dakota feel victimized by their own federal government.

It is keeping crops from getting to market, and it’s keeping our businesses from growing.

The idea that unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats should be allowed to make sweeping rules and regulations with no recourse should be a concern to every American, regardless of political affiliation….because it impacts everyone.

No party has a lock on the American dream and American innovation doesn’t have a party affiliation.

From the stack of paperwork required to process a bank loan to the regulatory price of putting food on the table, the cost of federal regulations are ultimately passed down to each and every American.

Without excessive regulation, imagine how much more money American families could have in their pockets to spend on what they want, instead of what the government wants.

If we cut our red tape, families can stop having to cut their budgets.

The regulatory regime is a dark cloud over our entire economy.

Now, I’m not saying there isn’t a place for rules in our society.

Rules are meant to keep us safe and promote the greater good.

And, I do believe there are some good rules and regulations on the books.

The problem I have is with the bad rules that keep good people from going about their lives.

Unfortunately, there are too many of these bad rules that are hindering our freedoms and stifling growth.

These are the regulations that we must reexamine.

So today, Madam President, I come to the floor to discuss legislation to permanently end regulation without representation.

It takes a giant leap forward in restoring the people’s role in the rulemaking process, and provides a way to reexamine the bad ones.

After all if the American people don’t like the laws we make, they can vote us out.

But they have no such power with unelected bureaucrats. They’re stuck!

You see, Madam President, the legislation I am introducing today would create a Joint Select Committee on Regulatory Reform whose purpose includes reviewing regulations currently on the books and proposing a new rules review process that includes the elected representatives of the American people.

It’s rooted in South Dakota common-sense and the principles that have made this country great—making government work for Americans rather than against them.

This committee would then make several recommendations to congress to rebalance this broken regulatory scheme:

First, the committee would be tasked with exploring options for Congress to review regulations written by agencies before they are enacted, providing much-needed oversight through the possibility of a Permanent Joint Rules Review Committee, which would be tasked with reviewing rules with a cost of $50 million dollars or more. This Permanent Joint Rules Review Committee would have the ability to delay the imposition of these rules for not more than one year from the time the agency submits the rule for review to enable Congress to act on that rule.

Second, the Committee would examine an option for agencies to submit each regulation with a $50 million dollar impact or more to the appropriate committees of Congress for review – before the rule is enacted.

And finally, the Joint Select Committee could recommend ways to reduce the financial burden regulations place on the economy as well as sunsetting onerous and outdated ones.

This Joint Select Committee would not be a permanent one – but it would be bipartisan, bicameral and hold meaningful hearings so that a permanent solution to our overregulation problem can be properly addressed.

This legislation also offers a starting point for the committee by requiring certain possible solutions to our regulatory problem to be considered.

I firmly believe that regulations should be reviewed by elected officials – those who are accountable to the American people through the democratic process.

This is not a new concept; it is a common practice at the state level.

41 of the 50 states, including my home state of South Dakota, have a rules review process to make sure the executive branch is faithfully executing the laws they seek to implement.

It is worth repeating that regulations are estimated to cost $1.88 trillion annually in the United States – above and beyond the tax burden our citizens already share.

That amounts to just under $5 billion dollars every single day. And it just doesn’t make sense.

It is unfair to those who still believe in – and are working to achieve the American Dream.

Whether Americans are seeking to buy a car, take out a mortgage on a house, start a business or see the doctor to make sure they are in good health, regulations obstruct them.

When I think of those who sacrificed everything so that our children and grandchildren could create their own version of the American Dream, I think about the freedoms and liberties they fought so bravely for.
They fought so we could pursue life, liberty and happiness and trust that our government would not hinder these lifelong endeavors.
It is not Washington that will continue to make this country great, but rather the collective spirit of individual Americans, who want to work hard to be successful for their families and their communities.

But they need the heavy hand of government to be lifted.

Here in Washington, it is not our job to dictate how Americans run their lives, but to allow them to achieve their dreams, not make them nightmares.

The term “Washington is broken” is a far-too-common term used to describe the current state of our federal government.

“Washington” is now used in a derogatory manner.

This city – the capitol of our nation – named after our very first Commander in Chief who led us to victory in the Revolutionary War and birthed this great nation – has become over time, a 4-letter word.

Remember, George Washington left the presidency voluntarily after two terms in office.

He wanted to get away from the monarch-style of government in which rulers held their positions for life.

And now, this city that bears his name is full of lifelong bureaucrats. Even worse, they are unaccountable to the people.

It is a far cry from the republic our founders envisioned.

Madam President, in 2026 our country will celebrate its 250th birthday. That is just over a decade away.

When we get to that point, I hope to join my fellow Americans in looking back with great pride in all we have accomplished, and all we have to pass on to future generations.

President Kennedy challenged our nation to put a man on the moon before the decade of the 60’s had passed.

We should commit ourselves to removing the barrier of government regulations that is weighing on that American spirit and again set free the American economy before the decade preceding our 250th birthday.

I’m not just introducing legislation to start a new committee that exists in name and does no deed. Americans want us and expect us to be up to this challenge, and we can. We can lift the heavy hand of government.

The founding fathers didn’t anticipate thousands of regulators and a million regulations when they created this country.

It’s time to end regulation without representation and restore the lawmaking process to the people.

I encourage my colleagues to sign onto this commonsense approach to addressing the issue of overregulation, so we can work to make this country even greater and safer than we found it.

Then, during our 250th birthday celebration, we can be proud that we RESTORED a little South Dakota and American common sense to our children and their children.

Thank you, Madam President. I yield the floor.

###

Rounds to Deliver Maiden Speech on Senate Floor Today

Rounds to Deliver Maiden Speech on Senate Floor Today
Tune into C-SPAN2 or watch live on Rounds’ YouTube Page

11027498_996383757073138_3426779629112937490_n

 

WASHINGTON – U.S. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) is scheduled to deliver his maiden speech on the senate floor today, June 2, 2015, at approximately 5:00 p.m. ET/4:00 p.m. CT/3:00 p.m. MT. During his speech, Rounds will discuss his bipartisan RESTORE Resolution, which seeks to permanently end over-regulation in America.

 

 

What: Senator Rounds’ Maiden Speech on the Senate Floor
When: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 5:00 p.m. ET/4:00 p.m. CT/3:00 p.m. MT
Location: Senate Floor of the U.S. Capitol, Washington, D.C.

How to watch:
Online: Livestream on Rounds’ YouTube page HERE.
On TV: Live on C-SPAN2

*A transcript and video of Rounds’ remarks will be available following his speech.

 ###

Delegation Supports Gov. Daugaard’s Request for Disaster Declaration

Delegation Supports Gov. Daugaard’s Request for Disaster Declaration

Governor’s Request Comes in Response to May 10 Storm

WASHINGTON, D.C.– U.S. Sens. John Thune (R-S.D.) and Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) and U.S. Rep. Kristi Noem (R-S.D.) today urged President Obama to declare a Major Disaster Declaration for Individual Assistance for South Dakota counties affected by the May 10, 2015, storm and EF-2 tornado, during which nine people were injured and 57 homes were damaged – including 27 that were completely destroyed.

“We respectfully request that you declare a major disaster for the relevant areas of our state and that you instruct federal agencies to expedite the delivery of all forms of federal disaster assistance for which the state is eligible based upon that declaration,” the delegation wrote. “We would be pleased to offer any assistance that you may require in fulfilling this request.”

Full text of the letter can be found below:

The Honorable Barack Obama
President of the United States
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500

 

Dear President Obama:

As members of the South Dakota Congressional delegation, we write to express our full support of Governor Dennis Daugaard’s request for a Major Disaster Declaration for Individual Assistance for the South Dakota counties of Douglas and Charles Mix. This declaration would greatly assist in recovery efforts from a severe storm and tornado event that occurred on May 10, 2015.

As the Governor’s request described, on May 10, 2015, an EF-2 tornado with a width of 400 yards and peak winds of 130 mph touched down in southeast South Dakota. The tornado’s primary point of impact was the City of Delmont, which suffered significant damage leaving 9 people injured and damaging 57 homes, of which 27 were considered completely destroyed. The local fire department was destroyed, and for two days the entire city was without power and water. Forty-one percent of the City of Delmont’s residential structures were damaged, the majority of which have major damage or are completely destroyed.

The Delmont community has a small population of 234 residents. Following this incident, 89 percent of the population was voluntarily evacuated due to hazardous power lines, leaking propane tanks, and other debris. Affected residents are still unable to return to their homes and are living in campers, renting temporary housing and staying in hotels. The nearest city capable of providing housing resources is 40 miles away, forcing displaced residents to move for long periods of time, significantly increasing commute times for work and school. These factors may eventually force citizens to relocate if the situation cannot be remedied.

The local Emergency Operations Center (EOC) was opened immediately following this tornado, along with the state EOC. The Governor has taken the appropriate action under state law, directing the execution of a State Emergency Operation Plan. Affected counties have also issued disaster declarations. The South Dakota Office of Emergency Management has coordinated resources to aid local government response, the details of which are outlined in the Governor’s request for a Major Disaster Declaration for Individual Assistance.

We respectfully request that you declare a major disaster for the relevant areas of our state and that you instruct federal agencies to expedite the delivery of all forms of federal disaster assistance for which the state is eligible based upon that declaration. We would be pleased to offer any assistance that you may require in fulfilling this request.

Thank you for your prompt consideration of this important matter. Please do not hesitate to contact any of us if we can provide you with additional information.

Sincerely,

###

Rounds Announces New Washington Office Location

RoundsPressHeader

Rounds Announces New Washington Office Location

MikeRounds official SenateWASHINGTON—U.S. Senator Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) today announced that his Washington, D.C., office has moved to the Hart Senate Office Building. Effective, today, June 1, 2015, his new office location will be 502 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C., 20510.

The office phone and fax numbers will remain unchanged at (202) 224-5842 (phone), (844) 875-5268 (toll free phone) and (202) 224-7482 (fax). The office hours will continue to be 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. EST. Each Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. when the Senate is in session, Rounds will continue to hold the South Dakota Sunrise Coffee for visiting groups and individuals. More information on this event can be found by calling his Washington office.

In addition to his Washington office, Rounds has four district offices in Pierre, Sioux Falls, Rapid City and Aberdeen. All office locations and contact information can be found at www.rounds.senate.gov.

###

US Senator Mike Rounds’ Weekly Column: Regulation without Representation

RoundsPressHeader

Regulation without Representation
U.S. Senator Mike Rounds
May 29, 2015

MikeRounds official SenateThe burden placed on Americans to pay for federal regulations in 2014 far exceeded the cost we paid in income taxes. According to the Competitive Enterprise Institute, Americans paid $1.88 trillion in regulatory compliance and $1.4 trillion in individual federal income taxes. These numbers should concern every one of us. Not only are regulatory costs taking money out of the pockets of South Dakota families, they are stunting economic growth and crushing the can-do American spirit that founded our nation, settled the West, won two world wars and put a man on the moon.

Even more alarming, the rules and regulations are being made by unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats at the highest level of government, often behind closed doors. The individuals creating many rules that impact us are not elected and have no direct contact with those who are impacted.

Our founders established three coequal branches of government with checks and balances for each. Recognizing the need for order in our society, they granted congress – whose members are elected by the people – the power to create laws. They never could have imagined today’s rulemaking process, in which unelected people in Washington have the final say in the bulk of rules under which we must live our daily lives. The regulators have essentially become a fourth branch of government and de-facto legislative body.  The current system squeezes out the voice of the people in the democratic process. It’s regulation without representation, and it’s wrong.

It’s time to restore the people’s role in the rulemaking process. I recently introduced a resolution in the Senate to create a Joint Select Committee on Regulatory Reform whose purpose is to review regulations currently on the books and propose a new rules review plan, one that includes elected representatives. The Regulation Sensibility Through Oversight Restoration (RESTORE) Resolution takes steps to permanently address overregulation and restore congress’ role in making certain the laws are being carried out as intended.

RESTORE directs the Joint Select Committee to conduct a systematic review of rules currently on the books. It would hold meaningful hearings on the effects of current rules and look for ways to reduce, eliminate or sunset unnecessary and outdated ones. To address regulations moving forward, RESTORE would direct the committee to review and recommend one of several options giving congress a role in reviewing rules before they are enacted. This is already happening in the state legislatures of 41 states, including South Dakota.

Not every rule is bad. Good rules weed out bad actors and keep us safe. But the role of the executive branch is to implement and enforce the laws as congress intended. Unfortunately, the lack of oversight has led to bureaucrats exceeding their authority and overstepping the role of the executive branch. The result is that the rules they implement are hindering our freedoms and stifling the American spirit.

The goal of RESTORE is to restructure the rulemaking process, returning it to the American people so they once again have a say in the rules and regulations that affect them the most. Last year, unelected bureaucrats  implemented 16 rules for every one bill that was signed into law. It is time to end regulation without representation and restore our faith in the people to make the best decisions for their families and businesses.

###

Rounds Statement on WOTUS Final Rule

RoundsPressHeader

Rounds Statement on WOTUS Final Rule

MikeRounds official SenateWASHINGTON—U.S. Senator Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), a member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, made the following statement on the administration’s Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) final rule, which was announced today. Last month, Rounds joined his colleagues in introducing bipartisan legislation to curb the effects of WOTUS.

“The WOTUS rule is a broad expansion of federal jurisdiction that infringes on private landowners’ rights throughout South Dakota,” said Rounds. “It goes far beyond what congress intended to be a traditional waterway under which EPA has regulatory oversight. Farmers and ranchers are rightly concerned about the compliance costs this misguided rule could have on their operations.”

“This underscores the need for a formal process to rein in overzealous regulators to make sure the rules are following congressional intent.  It is yet another example of unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats overstepping their boundaries and stretching the law – leaving the American people to suffer with the consequences. My RESTORE resolution, which I introduced last week, would lead to a permanent solution to this regulation without representation.”

More information about RESTORE is available here.

###

US Senator Mike Rounds’ Weekly Column: Honoring Those We Lost

Honoring Those We Lost
By Senator Mike Rounds
May 21, 2015

Memorial Day is a special time for us to remember all the brave men and women who died defending our nation on the battlefield. They paid the ultimate price to protect our freedoms. While they can never be repaid for their sacrifices, this weekend allows us to honor them posthumously. On Memorial Day, we remember who we have lost while serving this country. Their memory lives on through their families and friends and the legacies they leave behind, but it also lives on through the daily lives of all Americans who are safe and free because of their service. Through our Constitution, our founding fathers recognized the God-given rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Through the service of our men and women in uniform, those rights have been maintained. My uncle Marion Rounds, whom I am named after, was killed in battle on the Pacific island of Okinawa in 1945. I honor his memory, but especially on Memorial Day.

In the Senate, I have the unique privilege to serve on two committees that focus specifically on our military personnel: The Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) and Veterans’ Affairs Committee. In my time working in these committees, I continue to listen to the voices of veterans and current service men and women. I am humbled by their stories of bravery in the face of death and the horrors of war. Their heroism inspires me to do all I can to provide our military with the best tools to protect themselves while fighting the enemy, and provide our veterans with the care they’ve been promised so they can lead a happy, healthy life.

Just this month, provisions from two of my bills were included in the bipartisan National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that passed out of the Armed Services Committee. The first provision that passed would protect B-1 bombers from premature retirement. My legislation would add congressional oversight to any decision to retire the B-1, B-2 or B-52 bomber aircraft. Unless the Department of Defense can certify that retirement of these aircraft will not result in loss of operational capability, they will remain in use. In South Dakota, we have 27 B-1 bombers at Ellsworth Air Force Base that are critical to protecting our country. Long-range strike bombers play an important role in our national defense. A strong, properly supported bomber force will allow our Air Force men and women to continue to do their jobs safely and successfully.

Another of my provisions included in NDAA deals with current military members and military retirees’ access to healthcare. It would streamline the process for families enrolled in Tricare health plans when they move from one Tricare region to another. The current system for transferring Tricare beneficiaries is often ineffective, resulting in unnecessary delays. Our service members give everything to our country. Making simple changes to streamline transfer of their health care is the very least we can do.

The world continues to be a dangerous place. Members of our military continue to bravely fight those who wish to do us harm. They keep America free and make the world a better place. This Memorial Day, please take a moment to say thank you to our veterans and remember the sacrifices made to protect our freedoms.

###

Rounds Applauds Banking Committee Passage of Regulatory Reform Bill

Rounds Applauds Banking Committee Passage of Regulatory Reform Bill

WASHINGTON—U.S. Senator Mike Rounds (R-S.D), a member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, applauded today’s passage of “The Financial Regulatory Improvement Act of 2015” out of committee.

“I am pleased to see this important legislation move forward,” said Rounds. “The bill passed through committee today will provide much-needed regulatory relief to the financial services industry and the consumers they serve. South Dakota’s banking industry has been hit hard by rules stemming from Dodd-Frank, spending too much time and money on regulatory compliance. Our bill seeks to roll back of some of the ‘one-size-fits-all’ regulations within Dodd-Frank – a major win for South Dakota’s financial institutions. I hope my colleagues on both sides of the aisle will work together to pass this important legislation when it comes to the floor later this year.”

The Financial Regulatory Improvement Act of 2015 would mark the biggest reform of the Dodd-Frank Act since its enactment in 2010. It includes changes to federal mortgage rules to improve borrowers’ access to credit, particularly in rural areas, and will reduce the level of risk in the financial system.

###

Rounds Opening Statement at Oversight Hearing of Scientific Advisory Panels and Processes at the Environmental Protection Agency and Legislative Hearing on S. 543, the Science Advisory Board Reform Act of 2015

Rounds Opening Statement at Oversight Hearing of Scientific Advisory Panels and Processes at the Environmental Protection Agency and Legislative Hearing on S. 543, the Science Advisory Board Reform Act of 2015

WASHINGTON—U.S. Senator Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), chairman of the Environment and Public Works (EPW) Subcommittee on Superfund, Waste Management, and Regulatory Oversight, provided the following opening statement at today’s hearing, entitled “Oversight Hearing on Scientific Advisory Panels and Processes at the Environmental Protection Agency and Legislative Hearing on S. 543, the Science Advisory Board Reform Act of 2015.”

Witnesses include Dr. Roger O. McClellan, Advisor, Toxicology and Human Health Risk Analysis; Ted Hadzi-Antich, Senior Staff Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation; Alfredo Gomez, Director, Natural Resources and Environment Team, U.S. Government Accountability Office; Dr. Terry Yosie, President & CEO, World Environment Center; Scott Faber, Vice President of Government Affairs, Environmental Working Group.

Opening Statement as Prepared for Delivery:

“The Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Superfund, Waste Management, and Regulatory Oversight is meeting today to conduct an ‘Oversight Hearing on Scientific Advisory Panels and Processes at the Environmental Protection Agency and Legislative Hearing on S. 543, the Science Advisory Board Reform Act of 2015.’

The Environmental Protection Agency is tasked with developing environmental regulations that impact every American in every state across the country.

These regulations affect the water we drink, the air we breathe and the land we use. EPA has affirmed science is to be “the backbone of EPA decision making.”

The Science Advisory Board and Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, which are made up of scientific experts, are to supply the EPA with independent scientific and technical advice on a wide-range of topics, from hydraulic fracturing, to ozone emissions, to stream and wetland connectivity.

The EPA is to rely on this advice to assist them in crafting and issuing appropriate environmental regulations.

Unfortunately in recent years, EPA regulations have been driven not by science but by politics.

The EPA has not submitted critical Agency science or technical information to the SABs for review prior to implementing major regulations such as greenhouse gas rules for cars and trucks, new source performance standards for coal-fired power plants, and ozone regulations, despite statutory authority to do so.

Rather than allowing the science to drive the regulations, the EPA is carrying out the Administration’s political agenda through regulations with questionable science supporting them.

For example, at an EPW Subcommittee hearing yesterday we heard testimony that the EPA focused on the wrong issues when requesting the SAB review an EPA – led study that became a scientific foundation for the overly burdensome Waters of the U.S. Rule that is due out in the near future.

EPA, to achieve its goal of expanding jurisdiction, made the science fit into their preplanned agenda and the result will be a tremendous example of federal overreach.

In addition, due to not using proper science to begin with, as reported yesterday by the New York Times, the EPA engaged in its own lobbying campaign, under a questionable legal basis, to garner support for this rule.

Despite the fact that the SAB is to be an independent body that provides independent advice to the EPA, many SAB members are receiving EPA grants, which not only lends itself to conflict of interest issues, but also ties the hands of SAB members who may not be inclined to provide dissenting views or disagree with agency science.

When members do disagree with EPA science, there is little opportunity for members to express dissenting views.

We have also seen many instances in which members of these boards are reviewing their own scientific work without recusing themselves.

This diminishes any possibility that these boards will offer a truly impartial opinion regarding the validity of the science EPA is relying on.

For example, a recent CASAC review showed that 21 of 25 panelists had their own work cited by the EPA and meeting minutes did not note a single recusal.

Further, there is little opportunity for public participation or comments in these scientific reviews and there is minimal state, local and tribal representation on these boards.

The 47 member chartered SAB includes only three members from two states – California and Vermont.

Additionally, the panels tasked with advising the EPA on hydraulic fracturing and water body connectivity did not include representatives from any states.

As a result of these reviews, the EPA implements regulations that affect the entire country, yet there is minimal state participation on these boards and when there is, the vast majority of the country remains unrepresented.

  1. 543, the Science Advisory Board Reform Act of 2015, aims to address these problems by inserting more transparency and accountability in the SAB process.

If passed, it will allow for more public participation in the SAB review process, more accountability for the members of the board, and provide for more transparency for Congress and the public regarding the science behind EPA regulations.

The EPA should rely on the most up-to-date and sound science as the foundation for every regulation implemented by the agency.

It is vital that this scientific review process be done in a transparent manner, undertaken by experts who can provide an impartial and independent opinion, and with sufficient representation by those who would be affected by these regulations.

I’d like to thank our witnesses for taking the time to be with us today and I look forward to hearing your testimony.”

###

Rounds to deliver first floor speech today at 4pm

I know you’re all going to be in Pierre watching the Bosworth trial (snark), but, it’s also a big day for our newly elected Junior Senator – today will mark his first speech on the floor of the Senate.

Senator Rounds to Deliver Maiden Speech on Senate Floor Today
Tune into C-SPAN2 or watch live on Rounds’ YouTube Page

WASHINGTON – U.S. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) will deliver his maiden speech on the senate floor today, May 20, 2015, at 5:00 p.m. ET/4:00 p.m. CT/3:00 p.m. MT. During his speech, Rounds will introduce the bipartisan RESTORE Resolution, which seeks to permanently end overregulation in America.

What: Senator Rounds’ Maiden Speech on the Senate Floor
When: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 at 5:00 p.m. ET/4:00 p.m. CT/3:00 p.m. MT
Location: Senate Floor of the U.S. Capitol, Washington, D.C.

How to watch:
Online: Livestream on Rounds’ YouTube page HERE.
On TV: Live on C-SPAN2

*A transcript and video of Rounds’ remarks will be available following his speech.

###