Happy 5th Birthday to you……. You haven’t been born yet? You must be the Keystone pipeline!

9206919-vector-birthday-cake-with-burning-candles11We’re celebrating a birthday this week at the SDWC.

Happy Birthday to you……. Happy Birthday to you…..

You haven’t been born yet? How can that be?

Oh! You must be the Keystone pipeline!

Yes, the Obama administration has been fiddling around with a decision on the pipeline for 5 years now:

When trying to persuade policymakers and politicians of your point of view, sometimes you need a prop.

Supporters of the Keystone XL pipeline may have found theirs in a 14-inch pencil.

The American Petroleum Institute is using the jumbo-sized writing implements to drive home its belief that the Obama administration is taking too long to review TransCanada Corp.’s proposal to build the pipeline linking Alberta oil sands with Gulf Coast refineries.

Next Thursday, Sept. 19, marks five years since TransCanada first asked the U.S. government for permission to build the border-crossing pipeline.

Since the fifth anniversary is usually celebrated with wood, API ordered up the pencils to mark the occasion.

and…

But there will be no shortage of actions around the 5-year anniversary. A House Energy and Commerce subcommittee — which offers up an embeddable Keystone XL countdown clock online — is set to hold a hearing on the project next Thursday — naturally timed to coincide with the occasion.

“After five years and numerous delays by the State Department, we will look at the benefits and jobs denied by the delay of this landmark infrastructure project,” said Rep. Lee Terry, R-Neb., in announcing the hearing.

The State Department is currently reviewing public comments filed on its last environmental assessment of Keystone XL, as part of its charge to determine whether the pipeline is in the “national interest.” A final decision appears unlikely before early next year.

Read it all here.

Wondering about the life milestones that the Keystone pipeline has had while it patiently awaits birth?

Keystone XL Timeline

  • September 19, 2008 – TransCanada submits an application to the U.S. Department of State to construct the Keystone XL pipeline, an extension of the existing Keystone pipeline.
  • 2009 – Department of State conducts 20 scoping meetings in communities along the pipeline route and consults with federal and state agencies and Indian tribes.
  • April 16, 2010 – Department of State issues its Draft Environmental Impact Statement. It opens a 45-day comment period, which it extends for additional days.
  • Summer 2010 – Department of State hosts 21 public comment meetings in communities along the pipeline route. When the public comment period is extended, additional meetings are held. Nearly 1,800 verbal and written comments are received.
  • October 15, 2010 – Speaking to the Commonwealth Club of San Francisco, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is asked about approval of the Keystone XL pipeline and she says, “we are inclined to do so.”
  • October 25, 2010 – The General Presidents of four international unions representing a total of 2.6 million workers send a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton urging the Department of State to approve the Keystone XL pipeline project.
  • December 7, 2010 – Department of State hosts a government-to-government meeting for Indian tribes and other consulting parties.
  • January 2011 – TransCanada agrees to adopt 57 project-specific special conditions for design, construction, and operations of the Keystone XL pipeline. The conditions are developed by the Department of State and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration; according to the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, these conditions would give the Keystone XL pipeline “a degree of safety over any other typically constructed domestic oil pipeline,” making it a truly state-of-the-art pipeline.
  • April 15, 2011 – Department of State issues a Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement and opens another 45-day comment period. More than 280,000 comments are received.
  • July 25, 2011 – The Obama administration issues a Statement of Administration Policy calling legislation related to the Keystone XL pipeline unnecessary, declaring, “the Department of State has been working diligently to complete the permit decision process for the Keystone XL pipeline and has publicly committed to reaching a decision before December 31, 2011.”
  • July 26, 2011 – U.S. House of Representatives approves H.R. 1938, the North American-Made Energy Security Act. The bill, authored by Rep. Lee Terry (R-NE), requires a decision on the Keystone XL pipeline by November 1, 2011. The bill is approved with a strong bipartisan vote of 279-147.
  • August 26, 2011 – Department of State issues its Final Environmental Impact Statement and opens up a 90-day review period. The agency continues accepting public comments.
  • Fall 2011 – Department of State hosts public meetings in states along the pipeline route.
  • November 10, 2011 – President Obama announces that no decision on the Keystone XL pipeline will be made until after the 2012 election. A decision is expected in early 2013, after the administration identifies a new route for the pipeline.
  • November 10, 2011 – The president’s decision is widely attributed to political pressure exerted by environmentalist groups opposed to the pipeline. A statement from Terry O’Sullivan, General President of the Laborers’ International Union of North America, sums up the response: “Environmentalists formed a circle around the White House and within days the Obama administration chose to inflict a potentially fatal delay to a project that is not just a pipeline, but is a lifeline for thousands of desperate working men and women. The administration chose to support environmentalists over jobs – job-killers win, American workers lose.”
  • December 23, 2011 – Both the House and Senate unanimously approve – and President Obama signs into law – a bill requiring approval of the Keystone XL pipeline within 60 days unless the president determines the project does not serve the national interest.
  • January 18, 2012 – After over three years of review, President Obama formally rejects the pipeline’s Presidential Permit and asks TransCanada to reapply.
  • February 7, 2012 – The Energy and Commerce Committee approves H.R. 3548, the North American Energy Access Act. The bill, authored by Rep. Lee Terry (R-NE), removes the president’s authority over the pipeline’s permit and transfers it to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
  • February 16, 2012 – U.S. House of Representatives approves the PIONEERS Act with language from Rep. Terry’s bill requiring swift approval of the pipeline.
  • March 8, 2012President Obama personally lobbies the Senate to kill an amendment calling for congressional approval of the Keystone XL pipeline. In spite of the president’s efforts, 11 Senate Democrats joined all voting Republicans in favor of the project.
  • March 22, 2012 – On a visit to Cushing, Oklahoma, President Obama takes undue credit for the southern leg of the pipeline from Cushing to the Gulf Coast, ignoring the fact that he rejected the only Keystone permit that requires his approval because it crosses our national boundary with Canada.
  • April 18, 2012 – House approves H.R. 4348, the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2012, including language authored by Rep. Lee Terry (R-NE) taking the pipeline out of the president’s hands and requiring the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to approve the permit within 30 days. The bill passed with veto-proof support by a vote of 293-127.
  • April 18, 2012 – TransCanada submits a reroute of the Keystone XL plan to the state of Nebraska for review.
  • May 4, 2012 – TransCanada reapplies to U.S. State Department for a Presidential Permit.
  • May 18, 2012 – House passes a Motion to Instruct Conferees on H.R. 4348 to insist on Title II of the House bill regarding approval of the Keystone XL Pipeline. The motion passed with a bipartisan vote of 261-152.
  • June 15, 2012 – State Department publishes Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare a Supplemental EIS (SEIS) for the second Keystone XL Presidential Permit application.
  • January 22, 2013 – Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman gives approval of the proposed reroute of the pipeline through the Cornhusker State.
  • March 1, 2013 — The U.S. State Department issued its Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Keystone XL Presidential Permit application, which includes the proposed new route through Nebraska. The SEIS findings are similar to the Department’s FEIS issued last August, which found the pipeline will have limited adverse environmental impacts.
  • March 15, 2013 — H.R. 3, the Northern Route Approval Act, is introduced in the House by Rep. Lee Terry (R-NE). The bill addresses all the permits necessary beyond just presidential approval and would limit litigation that could doom the project.
  • March 22, 2013 — U.S. Senate agrees to Sen. John Hoeven’s (R-ND) budget amendment urging approval of the Keystone XL pipeline by a vote of 62-37. 17 Democrats joined every Senate Republican voting in favor of the amendment, signaling future filibuster-proof support for legislation to build the pipeline using congressional authority.
  • April 17, 2013 — The Energy and Commerce Committee approves H.R. 3, the Northern Route Approval Act, by a vote of 30 to 18.
  • May 22, 2013 — House approves H.R. 3, the Northern Route Approval Act, with bipartisan support by a vote of 241 to 175.

Read that all here.

When will President Obama allow the Keystone XL pipeline to finally be born?  Because 5 years is a long time for people to be sitting in a waiting room.

8 Replies to “Happy 5th Birthday to you……. You haven’t been born yet? You must be the Keystone pipeline!”

    1. Anne Beal

      not exactly…the real reason Obama (and, apparently, John McCain) wants to support the opposition forces in Syria is that they are supported by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, which want to build a pipeline across Syria (for natural gas, I understand) and Assad is against this.
      So Obama is against a pipeline crossing the US, but in favor of a pipeline crossing Syria, and prepared to go to war for it.
      Go figure.

      Reply
      1. Exodus

        I don’t know. That is a stretch to think that the only reason someone would want to intervene in Syria is because of an oil pipeline.

        Reply
  1. Anonymous

    KXL will never be build: the same geology that foiled DM&E makes any route across the Pierre Shale makes the pipeline look like just another land grab.

    Reply
  2. Anonymous

    KXL will never be built: the same geology that foiled DM&E makes any route across the Pierre Shale exposes the pipeline as looking like just another land grab.

    Reply
  3. Anon

    Obama needs to approve this and our own Senator Johnson needs to get off the dime and support it as well. He’s been with the President in delaying this from day one. Unacceptable.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.