I’m not sure what this accomplishes. Prairie Country PAC attacks GOP Leadership in run up to tomorrow’s Caucus election..

According to their facebook page, the Prairie Country PAC has apparently sent out a postcard attacking Republican Leadership in the lead-up to tomorrow’s caucus elections:

screen-shot-2016-11-11-at-9-42-22-am

15039670_1863511917228093_356068813244722233_o

15027972_1863511927228092_5630721856430558127_n

Maybe it’s just me, but I’m not sure what exactly this accomplishes.

First, given that several Senators, including President Pro Tempore Corey Brown have been termed out of office or resigned, such as Majority Leader Tim Rave and Assistant Majority Leader Dan Lederman both did in 2015, with a new crew of people after the election, the Senate Caucus is nearly starting from scratch in the elections.

The antagonistic nature of the card seems completely misplaced, as it attacks “Republican Leadership” on many measures while ignoring that these measures required a majority vote – and in some cases a 2/3 vote to pass. Effectively, they’re attacking everyone, while blaming leadership. And, of course, on the reverse side they’re asking people to vote for their favored candidates.

Just a bit of cognitive dissonance for legislators who will be asked to make a choice as to who their leadership would be.

Aside from that, we get into some of the technical aspects of the card.  There’s a few problems with it that will probably cause Prairie Country PAC some headaches.

Mistake #1 – As I spoke with Senator Elect Lance Russell himself yesterday, he wasn’t running for Assistant Majority Leader, and was predisposed to defer to Senator-elect Ryan Maher, who was. So, here’s a card promoting someone for the office who didn’t ask for it, much less was actively running for it.

Mistake #2 – The address side of the card appropriates the SDGOP’s logo for a Political Action Committee’s independent mailing. A PAC which includes in it’s leadership Ken Santema, Chairman of the South Dakota Libertarian Party.  I think it’s rather presumptuous for a PAC to appropriate the party’s logo for a piece of campaign literature attacking members of the party’s leadership.

Mistake #3 – Where exactly does it say “paid for by?”

12-27-15.   Printed political communications to contain certain language–Exceptions–Violation as misdemeanor.Any printed material or communication made, purchased, paid for, or authorized by a candidate, political committee, or political party which expressly advocates for or against a candidate, public office holder, ballot question, or political party shall prominently display or clearly speak the statement: “Paid for by (Name of candidate, political committee, or political party).” This section does not apply to buttons, balloons, pins, pens, matchbooks, clothing, or similar small items upon which the inclusion of the statement would be impracticable. A violation of this section is a Class 1 misdemeanor.

Read that here.

I see a logo & return address for the PAC, but not the three magic words; “Paid,” “For” and “By.” Considering their omission carries criminal penalties, you’d think people would pay more attention to it.

Probably the worst thing of all is that I don’t believe this or the nonsense with Citizens for Liberty sending e-mails is being done on behalf of the candidates. If it was, you’d think they would have noted that they weren’t sure they were running before all the nonsense went out.

The danger it poses is that it could have the opposite effect on Senators who are deciding who they want to lead them for the next two years, and harden their hearts. Which would be unfortunate.  I think Brock would do a good job as caucus leader, and shouldn’t be sandbagged by the misguided efforts of others.

21 Replies to “I’m not sure what this accomplishes. Prairie Country PAC attacks GOP Leadership in run up to tomorrow’s Caucus election..”

  1. Anonymous

    Isn’t this PAC basically Ken, Rich and Drew?

    Where can we find out who is financially donating to this PAC?

    This PAC seems to be erratic.

  2. Aberdeen Business Owner

    If any legislators change vote the opposite way they believe just to protest a postcard they should resign.

  3. Anonymous

    I don’t know of any Republicans who think that record is something South Dakota Republicans can be proud of. Good for the Aberdeen boys for pointing out what a mess “Republican” leadership is.

  4. Anonymous

    Am I missing something? Where exactly does it expressly and explicitly advocate for them or against anyone?

    He points out what they are supposedly running for, and states “the People’s choice” but that doesn’t explicitly advocate for or against them. Regardless, Why would a supposed conservative like you attack a conservative pack for pointing out bills of record that were supported by Democrats?

  5. Noddy Holder

    I’ve seen it happen before: when you get such a large majority it becomes a matter similar to herding cats. As your party gets so close to total dominance, your factions will get stronger. Just like Paul Ryan really did not want to be Speaker of the US House, I don’t know how you’ll get good, intelligent legislators to step up and truly lead.

    You’ll have to elevate people who really wouldn’t be worthy of fetching coffee for the likes of Joe Barnett.

  6. Anonymous

    Does Brock Greenfield remove Peters from appropriations? I think that is the big question. Can he even win the top spot?

  7. Troy Jones

    Despite Deb Peter’s unpopularity outside the Legislature in certain circles of the GOP for her social issue positions (notably abortion), she is an extremely competent chair of the Appropriations Committee and critical to there being a balance of power between the Governor’s Budget Office and the Legislature.

    Personally, I think in general Dilges does a great job but he should still be faced with good critical questions. Remove Peters from Appropriations Chair and the Legislature has given the Budget Office complete control of fiscal policy.

    It seems ever rumor I hear from Brock’s supporters only put a nail in his coffin.

    1. Anonymous

      I don’t think someone who was thrown out of the caucus once should be the chairman of a committee….

  8. Anonymous

    Rumor is the conservatives swept the senate leadership elections, and that Brock Greenfield is the new president pro Tem.

  9. anon1

    If Brock appoints one of the wing nuts as approps chair, my bet is that the General Bill fails on the floor of either the House or Senate. When did that last happen?