Letter to Senator Voight from one of his constituents on Senate Bill 16
A letter to Senator Voight objecting to Senate Bill was shared with me from one of his District 33 constituents today – and I was excited to share this, because he has some pretty good bullet points on the complete ridiculousness of the measure.
In hunting terms, it’s good ammo for those seeking to put Senate Bill 16 in their crosshairs, and to bring the measure down:
Dear Senator Voight,
I am writing to express my opposition to SB 16, which would require guides to pay a fee and become licensed by the state. I am a constituent and business owner in your district.
My opposition begins with a core principle: good government is small, restrained government. This bill may appear modest on its face, but licensure is rarely a one-time action. First comes the license, then a board to oversee it, followed by staff, rulemaking, enforcement, and ongoing administrative cost. Once created, these structures rarely shrink or disappear, regardless of whether the original problem ever materializes. It feels a lot like GF&P staff may have “suggested” this bill to you.
Second, I see SB 16 as a solution in search of a problem. I would respectfully challenge you to identify a specific instance where a member of the public was harmed by a guide in a way that would have been prevented or meaningfully mitigated by state licensure. Existing laws already address fraud, negligence, and misconduct. Creating a new licensing regime without a documented pattern of harm sets a concerning precedent.
Finally, the proposed license fee is inordinately high, particularly when viewed in the context of other professional licenses in South Dakota. Many guides are part-time or seasonal workers. In practice, this fee would almost certainly be passed on to lodges, meaning an additional regulatory burden on agricultural producers who are already facing rising costs, labor shortages, and regulatory pressure from multiple directions.
For context, here are common professional license fees in South Dakota today:
South Dakota – Common Professional License Fees
• Physician (MD/DO): $450
• Certified Public Accountant (CPA): $50
• Registered Nurse (RN): $100
• Real Estate Salesperson/Broker: $100–$200
• Cosmetologist: $45
• Barber: $50–$100
• Electrician: $50–$150+
• Plumber: $50–$150+
• Architect: $100–$300+
• Professional Engineer: $100–$300+When a seasonal guide license approaches or exceeds the cost of licenses held by highly regulated professionals, it raises serious questions about proportionality and legislative intent.
For these reasons, I respectfully urge you to reconsider SB 16 and its long-term implications for limited government, rural businesses, and South Dakota producers.
Sincerely,
Chris Hipple
Well, when Senator Voight proposes charging more for a fishing guide license than the state does for a doctor or an electrician, it makes you wonder where his sense of proportion is. And Chris makes a number of good points on what happens after the license.. a board to oversee it, followed by staff, rule making, enforcement, and ongoing administrative cost.
I just don’t see where there are many South Dakotans who are demanding to sign up for all that new government.








