RELEASE: NEW ANALYSIS SHOWS SOUTH DAKOTA PASSENGERS WILL PAY UP TO $3.2 MILLION IN ADDITIONAL AIRPORT FEES UNDER NEW CONGRESSIONAL PROPOSAL

NEW ANALYSIS SHOWS SOUTH DAKOTA PASSENGERS WILL PAY UP TO $3.2 MILLION IN ADDITIONAL AIRPORT FEES UNDER NEW CONGRESSIONAL PROPOSAL

Despite Access to Millions of Dollars, Some in Congress Pushing Massive Tax Hike On South Dakota Fliers

PIERRE, SD – Stop Air Tax Now, a project of Airlines for America, today released an analysis detailing the higher fees that South Dakota fliers will pay if Congress approves a proposal to raise a fee passengers pay when flying out of commercial airports. The fee hike could be approved as early as January 19th.

The proposal would increase the Passenger Facility Charge (PFC), a tax added to the cost of plane tickets that is transferred directly to airports, by $4, to $8.50, on the first leg of each flight. The study shows that travelers flying out of South Dakota will annually pay up to $3.19 million more in PFCs under the new proposal.

“South Dakota does not need a tax hike,” said Dave Roetman, Minnehaha County GOP Chair. “Placing this extra burden on our commercial flyers will hamper our economic activity and make flying even more expensive for our citizens.”

The tax increase, proposed under the guise of modernization and expansion requirements, comes as airports in South Dakota took in $17.3 million in operating revenue last year and $13.84 million in grants. Additionally, South Dakota airport facilities have access to $6 billion dollars in federal funding from the FAA’s trust fund.

The tax increase would add up to $2 million annually to the coffers of Sioux Falls Regional Airport (FSD), the most of any airport in the state. FSD already has $13.54 million in unrestricted cash and investments and collected $2.75 million in grants last year.

Rapid City Regional Airport would also see up to $1.04 million annually from the increased tax despite receiving $1.07 million last year.

Passengers flying from smaller airports like Pierre Regional Airport would pay the highest amount in PFCs because most trips from smaller airports require a connecting flight. Under the fee increase, passengers flying out of smaller airports will pay $13 in PFCs on each flight – $8.50 on the initial leg of the trip and $4.50 for the second flight.

The existing Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Program allows the collection of PFC fees up to $4.50 for every enplaned passenger at commercial airports controlled by public agencies. PFCs are capped at $4.50 per flight segment with a maximum of two PFCs charged on a one-way trip or four PFCs on a round trip, for a maximum of $18 total. The proposed $4 increase on the first leg of a flight will increase the round-trip maximum to $26.

More detailed information on specific states and airports can be found at http://www.stopairtaxnow.com/pfc-impact-revenue-state.

#

5 Replies to “RELEASE: NEW ANALYSIS SHOWS SOUTH DAKOTA PASSENGERS WILL PAY UP TO $3.2 MILLION IN ADDITIONAL AIRPORT FEES UNDER NEW CONGRESSIONAL PROPOSAL”

  1. Anon

    Everyone from typical travelers to President Trump has decried the sorry state of American airport infrastructure. Airports would like to have the freedom to impose higher per-passenger charges to finance needed investments.
    http://thehill.com/opinion/finance/364489-taxpayers-travelers-win-with-a-modernized-airport-facility-charge?amp
    (Truth is, Trump couldn’t care less about our state. He’d call us just a “S**thole State” if he was asked to do anything to help us.)

    1. Anonymous

      I doubt if he would call South Dakota such a name. I think he understands that South Dakota, as flyover country, helped elect him, and we are filled with conservatives who support his agenda, an agenda which is good for America and good for South Dakota.

  2. duggersd

    Are the “improvements” necessary? If the answer is yes, then who should pay for them, the people who benefit from the improvements or the rest of the country?

  3. Anne Beal

    More comfortable seating would be nice.
    Having spent 3-4 hours on two different occasions waiting, once for an aircraft which never did arrive from Denver, another time waiting for a crew to arrive from Denver, I have spent way more time than I would like stretched out on the floor at FSD.
    Passengers can be found sleeping on the floor at airports all over the country. So cleaner carpets and more USB ports would be really nice; it would be good to know what they plan to spend the money on.