I know what you are thinking. We already have enough rigged, amateur candidate evaluation forms coming out from “conservative groups…” But that didn’t stop Gordon Howie and his supporters from creating another one.
In case you were wondering, in district 9 Lora Hubbel scores an 85.7% conservative rating while Peters only scores 16.6%. What are the chances the issues wouldn’t favor Peters? In District 4 Belkgaka vs Rausch 87.5% and 12.5%. Who would have thought.
I couldn’t help but notice that Steve Sibson recieved a perfect 100% rating against Mike Vehle who recieved a 0% (not saying anything but it does look like the teacher might have scaled the test to favor his favorite pupil.)
These are the issues candidates are being graded on: As soon as I see anything in these evaluations that indicates any of our Republican legislators support Obamacare, I disregard the survey immediately and lose respect for those pushing this agenda. This indicates to me that it is a survey designed purely to mislead the public. None of the people in this survey support Obamacare.
And Gordon Howie conlcludes with this statement:
When Ronald Reagan said those words, I’m sure he wasn’t thinking Gordon Howie would be the person choosing the issues that dictate whether someone lived up to his statement or not. When we’re evaluating legislators, we should look at their entire record, consider the possibility that all bills are not equally well crafted, and avoid advocates who cherry pick issues unless they clearly identify those issues.