To pursue, or not to pursue Lobbyist cash. That is the question.

One question that inevitably comes up in campaigns from candidates is “If you’re a candidate, should you aggressively pursue money from lobbyists?”

Well, that’s a darned good question. Most lobbyists worth their salt know who the players are out there, and where they stand on issues. Or at least where they say they’ll stand. Some organizations give a little to many candidates, and might get involved if there’s a race they’re particularly concerned about.

But, some candidates don’t consider it a bad thing to throw a line in the water, and see what bites. Such as this letter from Democrat State Representative Karen Soli, who send a letter to her ubiquitous lobbyist “Friends.”

Soli_wants_Lobbyist_cash

In her first race in 2012, Soli didn’t exactly make a big impact from PAC’s, raising only $763. But fast forward to 2014, after she’d served a term of office, and she had a bit more success:

ksoli_2014general by Pat Powers on Scribd

In 2014, Soli managed to raise $5200 in Political Action Committee funds (both in-State and Out of State), providing her with a far bigger bankroll than she’d had in her previous race, and almost double than she’d been able to raise on her own.

And, she did win by 500 votes, so it’s likely that big influx of cash made a significant difference.

I’m not exactly sold on candidates using the always awful “Dear Friends” generic letter for something like this. I think it would be more important to personalize and point out how your views align with the organization. Or better yet, speak to the organization you want to raise hundreds or thousands from, and let them make the call for support.

What do you think?

(Updated) Coalition against IM22 already has radio ad prepped. running!

defeat22

Initiated Measure 22, Slick Rick Weiland’s measure to have taxpayers pay for political campaigns, has an official opposition group, “Defeat 22,” which at the onset is comprised of groups such as Americans for Prosperity, the South Dakota Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the South Dakota Retailers Association who have banded together to fight this awful legislation to divert taxpayer funds.

And they have a radio ad already prepped and ready to go. 

Update! I have a note from coalition leader Ben Lee of Americans for Prosperity that the Radio ad started running across the state on Friday, July 8th.

Give it a listen, and tell us what you think:

Want to join the fight against 22? Sign up to defeat it Defeat22.com.

Well, that should be interesting… Constitutional party apparently nominates for US Senate and Legislative seat.

Apparently, yesterday the Constitution party decided that they’re going to try to act outside of state law, and sue to get their people on the ballot instead of using the normal primary process.

Good luck with that.

From Ballot Access News:

The Constitution Party is ballot-qualified in South Dakota. However, under the law, it can’t nominate candidates for Congress or legislature by convention, even though it can nominate for certain other partisan offices by convention. Nevertheless, on June 9 (Actually, July 9, -PP), it did hold its state convention and it did nominate a candidate for U.S. Senate and one for the legislature.

Read that here.

I can only guess who those are. (I’m thinking Lori Stacey for Senate, and Lora Hubbel for Legislature.).  Anyone finding anything I missed?

US Senator John Thune’s Weekly Column: National Security Must Be Our Top Priority

thuneheadernew John_Thune,_official_portrait,_111th_CongressNational Security Must Be Our Top Priority
By Sen. John Thune

By now, most Americans have seen in chilling detail what happened late last month in Istanbul, Turkey. A group of terrorists casually walked into one of Ataturk Airport’s public terminals and proceeded to open fire before detonating suicide vests among fleeing travelers. In the wake of this attack, 45 people were left dead, and more than 200 were injured. Although no group has formally claimed responsibility, the Turkish government says all signs point to ISIS.

The list of cities outside the Middle East impacted by ISIS-related terrorist attacks is steadily growing: Paris, Brussels, and now Istanbul. While an ocean separated us from the latest attack, Americans have seen radical Islamic terrorism on our shores in San Bernardino, and most recently in Orlando. These attacks are a warning sign that ISIS-inspired attacks aren’t contained to certain borders, and in response we must do everything we can to protect Americans around the world.

The Republican-led Senate is committed to defeating ISIS, but I am concerned some Democrats, President Obama included, don’t entirely share that priority. John Brennan, the Obama-appointed director of the CIA, recently conceded that “our efforts have not reduced the group’s terrorism capability and global reach.” Part of that bleak assessment is likely due to the fact that President Obama has never – despite all of the ISIS-created carnage around the world – laid out a comprehensive plan to defeat the terrorist group. While the Republican-led Senate can’t force President Obama to take this threat seriously, we can work hard to pursue policies that will increase our national security, and that’s exactly what we’re doing.

One of the best ways to combat terrorism is by ensuring the military has the resources it needs to fulfill its mission. It’s unfortunate, though, that for the second year in a row, Senate Democrats have decided to put their interests ahead of our troops by playing politics with the Department of Defense appropriations bill. Passing this essential bill is a key part of meeting our obligations to the men and women in uniform who fight to keep us safe. My hope is that my Democrat colleagues drop their unnecessary objections and let this bill move forward without delay.

Another key aspect to protecting our nation from terrorist threats is controlling our borders, which is why I’m disappointed Senate Democrats recently blocked a bill that would have discouraged sanctuary city policies, which have resulted in the release of thousands of criminals who could otherwise have been picked up by federal authorities and deported. That debate is far from over, though.

The Senate will also soon take up several important airport security measures that I authored, which will keep air travelers in South Dakota and around the country safer and more secure. Included is a provision that improves the vetting of airport employees to address the risk that an insider might give a terrorist access to secure areas of an airport.

Although I’m not holding out much hope, I’d like to think the president and his allies on Capitol Hill will develop a greater seriousness about ISIS in the coming months. But whatever they do – or fail to do – Republicans will do everything we can to protect our country and keep Americans safe from terrorists.

###

US Senator Mike Rounds’ Weekly Column: An Audit of IHS is Necessary to Improve Health Care of Tribal Members

Rounds Logo 2016 MikeRounds official SenateAn Audit of IHS is Necessary to Improve Health Care of Tribal Members
By Senator Mike Rounds

Over the past year, my office has been looking into the financial, structural and administrative problems at Indian Health Service (IHS) so that we can better understand how to reform the agency and provide better health care for tribal members. As our tribal members know all too well, the IHS has been failing to live up to its trust responsibility to provide health care to Native Americans. Its shortcomings have been documented in a number of Government Accountability Office (GAO) reports, yet there has never been a systemic review of IHS to address the health care crisis currently going on in the Great Plains Area, which includes South Dakota. Furthermore, IHS fails to adequately consult with the tribes when making decisions about their health care.

I recently requested an audit by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to review the financial aspects of hospital and health care, medical services and overall financial management at IHS. Based on my office’s discussions with tribal leaders, we believe an audit is the appropriate first step toward identifying areas of concern and finding solutions to fix the ongoing problems at the agency.

The audit is supported by both tribal members and officials within HHS. The Great Plains Tribal Chairman’s Association recently passed a resolution calling upon Congress to demand an audit of IHS. Additionally, during the Senate Indian Affairs Committee field hearing in Rapid City on June 17, 2016, that I participated in, HHS Acting Deputy Secretary Mary Wakefield said that HHS “would welcome” an audit of IHS.

As I wrote in my request, despite the agency’s well-documented history of failing to meet trust obligations by not providing quality health care, there has never been a systemic review of IHS to address and ultimately reform these issues in attempt to improve health outcomes for tribal members. Furthermore, there has been a continuing lack of consultation with the tribes. I believe an audit – similar to what was recently conducted at the Veterans Health Administration, which identified shortfalls and recommended solutions – is a potential model for addressing these critical financial and quality issues within IHS.

The problems at IHS are serious. The Great Plains Area IHS has the second highest mortality rate among all IHS regions. We also have the highest diabetes death rate, more than triple the average among IHS facilities. Our life expectancy rate is the lowest of all IHS regions, at 68.1 years. The U.S. average life expectancy is nearly a decade longer at 77.7 years. It is clear the IHS is failing our tribal members, who are suffering and in some cases dying due to this inadequate and disgraceful care. We are hopeful that the audit will show us specific areas we can focus on to begin making significant changes.

###

Congresswoman Kristi Noem’s Weekly Column: Breaking Barriers to Mental Healthcare

noem press header kristi noem headshot May 21 2014Breaking Barriers to Mental Healthcare
By Rep. Kristi Noem

You often times don’t have to look far to find a family that’s been failed by our broken mental healthcare system – and with nearly 30,000 adults and about 9,000 children living with serious mental health conditions in South Dakota, it’s a challenge I’d guess most families can, to some degree, relate to.

As many know, our healthcare system isn’t adequately prepared to help those who face mental illness – especially chronic or severe mental illnesses. As a result, many are falling through the cracks, landing in a jail cell, homeless shelter, or worse, instead of a hospital bed.

The reasons for this are numerous. Some can’t afford the costs.  Others can’t find or easily get to a facility for help.  Others are fearful of what their friends or family may think.  In broadly bipartisan legislation passed by the House of Representatives earlier this month, we have worked to mitigate as many of these barriers as possible.

To date, the federal government’s approach to mental health has been a patchwork of outdated programs and ineffective policies that span across numerous federal agencies at the cost of about $130 billion annually.  At its core, the Helping Families with Mental Health Crisis Act, which I cosponsored, looks to streamline the system and refocus our efforts on providing efficient and effective care.

More specifically, this legislation breaks down barriers for families to work with healthcare providers, helping ensure they can be meaningful partners in caring for those with serious mental illnesses.  We also made advances in tele-psychiatry to better reach underserved and rural communities, and we offered more tools for suicide prevention.  Other provisions were included to fix the shortage of crisis mental health beds, improve the transition from one level of care to another, and even offer alternatives to institutionalization for those with serious mental illnesses.

I also worked closely with the bill’s author, psychologist and Pennsylvania Representative Tim Murphy, on several provisions aimed at helping tribal communities – even bringing him to South Dakota to meet with folks in Pine Ridge who are fighting a devastating suicide epidemic.  Because of our work, new provisions were included to help support and prioritize Native American suicide programs.

Today’s mental healthcare system is inefficient at best; at worst, it’s unable to intervene and seclude an individual who could cause harm to themselves or others.  Changes need to be made and made urgently.  This legislation offers the most significant reforms to our nation’s mental healthcare system that we’ve seen in decades.  It’s thoughtful, thorough and bipartisan, so I’m hopeful we can see it become law soon.

One more thing: if you or someone you love is facing a mental health crisis, I encourage you to call the National Helpline at 1-800-662-HELP (4357).  This is a free and confidential, 24-hour-a-day, 365-day-a-year information service.  They can provide referrals to local treatment facilities, support groups, and community-based organizations.  Please don’t wait to find help.

###

Governor Daugaard’s Weekly Column: South Dakota’s Wildland Fire Crew

daugaardheader daugaard2South Dakota’s Wildland Fire Crew
A column by Gov. Dennis Daugaard:

It has been a dry year in parts of South Dakota. Sixty percent of the land in South Dakota is abnormally dry and counties west of the river and in the northeast are experiencing moderate to extreme drought. Drought is most severe in the Lawrence County area where the fire at Crow Peak burned more than 2,700 acres over the course of two weeks.

As I write this, the Crow Peak fire has just reached 100 percent containment. Under the lead of an Incident Management Team from Colorado, no structures were lost and no one was seriously injured or killed. The team had help from local, volunteer and municipal fire departments from across the state that put in many hours and sacrificed their Fourth of July weekend to assist the Incident Management team.

Our state fire crew, the South Dakota Department of Agriculture’s Division of Wildland Fire, also played a critical role in managing the Crow Peak fire. They offered air support, equipment and hand crews to assist the Black Hills National Forest and the Incident Management Team with containment.

Created by Gov. Bill Janklow in 2001 to assume the duties of wildland fire management in South Dakota, our Wildland Fire Division assists in large fire suppression efforts by sending personnel and equipment. Wildland Fire has its own fleet of fire engines with full-time and seasonal firefighters who are stationed at four locations around the Black Hills. Division employees also work with the South Dakota National Guard which lends military heavy lift helicopters, pilots and crews to fight wildfires. Wildland Fire’s efforts aren’t limited to South Dakota. They help fight fires in Canada and across the United States.

When they are not on the ground fighting fires, Wildland Fire employees are engaging in fire prevention efforts. Agency hand crews are involved in fuel reduction activities that include tree thinning and brush disposal through chipping and burning at various locations in the Black Hills. They also have a fire prevention program called “One Less Spark.”

South Dakota is fortunate to have a well-operating fire crew. Wildland Fire division director Jay Esperance and his employees work very hard to limit the damage from wildfires. We are also lucky to have so many volunteer firefighters in our state who are willing to dedicate their time to help with fire suppression efforts. They routinely put their lives on the line to keep us safe.

For our part, we must not add to their workload. Respect county burn bans when they’re in place. Where fires are permitted, never leave a fire unattended, completely extinguish fires before leaving the area and remind others to be cautious. Also, be mindful when operating equipment in dry areas.

South Dakota weather is anything but predictable. We can’t prevent lightning strikes or control how much moisture we receive. But we should do all that is within our power to prevent fires, especially this year.

-30-

Sioux Falls Black Lives Matter organizer claims we should feel guilt over “the system.” But, the system belongs to us all.

Did anyone read the interview this morning at Argus Leader.com from the organizer of the Sioux Falls Black Lives Matter vigil?  I can’t help but scratch my head at one of her statements:

Particularly, when you exist in a white body, you live in a system that has always told you that you are right. Being told you are wrong and feeling the guilt of that and not letting that guilt stop you from engaging in really important work is hard. It’s scary because we aren’t used to being wrong. It’s an important lesson to learn.

Read that here.

I guess I’m struck by how this woman lumps everyone into certain life experiences based on the color of their skin, aside from the choice of the phrase “exist in a white body.” And that somehow people of different racial backgrounds have different “systems.”

Martin Luther King marched, and died, in the 1960’s for a dream of an equal and color-blind nation. He spoke the words “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”  I really don’t see how claiming that people who “exist in a white body” have one system that’s somehow “wrong,” by some unspoken and arbitrary measure honors that dream and unifies us.

MLK spoke about America as a promise, and under it’s framework, all men are created equal, and deserve equal access and opportunity under the promise. The American Dream is our only system, and it has nothing to do with race, except to remind people that it isn’t, and shouldn’t be a factor.

That’s what “the system” I was brought up in taught me. And I don’t think there’s anything that I was taught that is remotely “wrong.”

What do you think?

State of South Dakota Joins Lawsuit Against Bathroom Mandate

jackley-logo Marty JackleyState of South Dakota Joins Lawsuit Against Bathroom Mandate

PIERRE, S.D.- Attorney General Marty Jackley announced today that South Dakota has joined a lawsuit filed today in Nebraska Federal District Court against the U.S, Department of Education and U.S. Department of Justice over the bathroom mandate. There are a total of 23 states joining the Nebraska and Texas cases, 10 in Nebraska and 13 in Texas.

“As Attorney General it was and remains my hope that our country and state lawmakers can find a solution to the transgender bathroom concerns. However, the President’s mandate or directive that children of opposite sex must be required to share locker rooms and bathrooms under the threat of lawsuit and withholding of education funding is a solution that goes beyond his authority. I am therefore joining other Attorneys General in the Nebraska litigation to clarify that federal law cannot mandate that children of opposite sex be required to share locker rooms and bathrooms.”

States included in the Nebraska lawsuit are Arkansas, Kansas, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Carolina, South Dakota and Wyoming.

A similar case was filed earlier in the 5th Circuit District Court by State of Texas joined by Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

There is no cost for South Dakota to join these proceedings.

Groups start banding together to oppose Weiland-promoted taxpayer funded campaign measure

Snake-oil salesman Rick Weiland can’t catch a break as he tries to wreck democracy in South Dakota, as three major groups have banded together to oppose his taxpayer-funded campaign measure being sold as “ethics reform.”

A national conservative organization is joining forces with two statewide business associations to defeat an initiated measure on November’s ballot.

Americans for Prosperity, the South Dakota Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the South Dakota Retailers Association will oppose Initiated Measure 22, which backers have dubbed as a set of good-government reforms aimed at preventing corruption in South Dakota government.

Ben Lee, the chairman of Defeat 22 and the state director for Americans for Prosperity, said the coalition planned to start an advertising blitz on Friday that included radio ads, mailers and door hangars to begin educating voters about the measure.

and..

Chamber president David Owen said his members worry publicly financed campaigns will divert millions of dollars from basic government services. If each of the more than 520,000 registered voters assigned their democracy credits, it would mean $52 million.

“Even if it’s $9 million, that’s money that’s not going to go to paving roads, schools and locking criminals up,” Owen said.

Read it all here.