“The Green Bay Packers never lost a game. They just ran out of time.” (Vince Lombardi)

Three nights ago, the Cleveland Indians were up 3 games to 1 on the Chicago Cubs and I pretty much counted them out. As a Twins/Nationals/Rockies fan, I really don’t have a dog in the fight. But, I love baseball so I’m still interested and will watch the game tonight.

Yes, the Cubs had two better pitchers scheduled in games #5 & #6 but not so much better it was a slam-dunk they’d win these two must-win games. And, for the 7th game, the Indians have the better pitcher scheduled on the mound. Three nights ago, Vegas oddsmakers gave the Cubs about a 15% chance of winning the World Series. Now, after winning two games in a row (25% chance they would win both games), the oddsmakers have the Cubs at a 45% chance of being the World Champions. It’s game on!!

Three weeks ago, the Billy Bush/Donald Trump tape came out and I begged for Trump to drop out and let us take our chances with Mike Pence. When the tape came out, Nate Silver handicapped Trumps chances at less than 15% (roughly equivalent to the Cubs odds three nights ago). Personally, I thought it was high. I reacted as I did with the Cubs and said “game over.” I almost entitled this thread “To win, you’ve got to stay in the game” (Claude Bristol). NOT!

Five things have happened in the last week which I didn’t expect (could have also entitled this “Skip, what are we gonna do about those numbers? They suck.” from the movie Perfect Storm):

1) The Wikileaks released emails provide a smoking gun on how the Clintons parlayed the Office of the Secretary of State to enrich the Clinton personally to the tune of what could be over $50 million. This is what I think is most significant because it goes beyond being a political fibber (the public seems to expect or at least tolerate political fibbing) who spins everything or says anything to curry favor with the voters. Personal graft and enrichment is beyond acceptable to a very large segment of the voting public.

2) This is what I think should have been the most insignificant. The FBI informed Congress they were re-opening the investigation into Hillary’s use of a private server. Comey said he’d keep Congress informed if he got new information. He got new information. And, he was clear he didn’t know if the information was significant and would report back. Should have been the end of the story.

3) Hillary totally badly muffed her reaction. She should have said, “Director Comey has a job to do and is accountable to both the President and Congress. I’m confident when they get through the new information the conclusion of a few months ago will be confirmed. Director Comey is an honorable public servant.” This response would have given the impression she was truly confident there is “nothing new” and would have matched her words “there is nothing there.” Additionally, it would have reinforced her earlier praise of Director Comey. Instead, the disconnects were palpable. She basically violated the Cardinal Rule of corporate crisis management. Twice. And reinforced she might not be trustworthy, her biggest weakness.

4) The Press went bonkers on the letter which belied how much they are in the tank for Hillary and it reinforced Trump’s message the system is rigged.

5) After watching great points and positions get lost in too many shallow bromides or distracting ramblings, Trump got on message AND presented it concisely and cogently. On Monday, Trump and Pence laid out a powerful case for a Trump Presidency, in particular replacing Obamacare and how his economic plan serves the interests of ALL Americans in ALL walks of life. It was so moving, I almost drove to Canton to vote just in case I got hit by a bus between then and Election Day. Frankly, I think this might in the end be more significant than even #1 above.

Today, Nate Silver updated his handicapping of the President race Trump a 30% chance of winning (assumed Hillary leading in the polls by 4%). He also did an analysis which assumes Hillary is leading by 2%. While he didn’t complete the math, I did and and a 2% Hillary leads changes the odds of Trump winning to slightly above 40%. Nate Silver’s latest analysis can be read here

Personally, I think Silver’s methodology masks a slight hidden disadvantage for Trump. Before the polls started to move last week, 20% of the votes were cast via early voting and Hillary was ahead by roughly 5%. Assuming early votes reflected the national position, Hillary has banked what translates into a 1% advantage. Trump has to move the population past even and make-up this 1% disadvantage.

Well folks, the current realclearpolitics.com race has Trump behind less than 2% and he clearly has the momentum. A few weeks ago, he was down 7%, narrowed it to 5.4%, and it is now under 2%.

Whether he can continue to move the voting public or there is enough people open to being moved, I don’t know. But, it appears Hillary doesn’t have the game to stop the momentum. Her recent acts of desperation, including bringing back Alicia Machado to the forefront, aren’t gonna get the job done.

The Cubs know they have at least 9 innings and maybe more.

Donald Trump is behind and has six more days and nothing more. I hope its enough time and Trump/Pence uses the time well.

There is a chance and its no longer a long-shot.

UPDATE: Cubs win. Trump do the “impossible” too? Well, Hillary seems intent on muffing again.

6 thoughts on ““The Green Bay Packers never lost a game. They just ran out of time.” (Vince Lombardi)

  1. Spencer

    I like Nate’s methodology. He attempts to use numbers and models with a scientific approach taking into account house effects with polls, etc. The national probabilities are about winning or losing, not if it will be close. The electoral college race is extremely close right now. Nate’s model will shift those odds dramatically if Colorado, Virginia, Pennsylvania, or Michigan start showing a Trump lead. The media likes to repeat endlessly about how Trump has to run the table with the swing states, which is true. But, he will likely win all or most of them. The opposite can be said about Hillary. She needs to hold on to the four states above, or she will likely lose. I think this last surge by Trump completely destroys any possible perception of a mandate by Hillary to do anything if elected if by whatever chance she does end up winning. It may also save the Senate for the GOP. I have been tracking early voting totals for Iowa, North Carolina, and Florida modeling to 2012 turnouts. Trump is outperforming Romney in all of them. As of today the GOP is running 137,000 votes ahead in North Carolina compared to 2012 when Romney edged out Obama. The souls to the polls scheme has been one big flop this year for the Democrats. At the rate they are amassing early votes in North Carolina, Trump will win with a 4% margin. If the GOP can maintain their edge in the early vote in Florida, it will translate into roughly a 1.22% win for Trump. Iowa will depend on the more Republican turnout on Election Day to win, but this is what polling has been consistently saying for Trump. As of today’s early vote in Iowa, Trump loses by 2.72% versus Romney’s loss margin of 5.81% in 2012. That being said Hillary has not been polling well in Iowa all year compared to Obama. So, Trump will likely carry Iowa too, perhaps, by a sizable single-digit margin. Maine and New Mexico could be interesting and could be critical in a close electoral college contest.

  2. Anonymous

    269-269 tie and House picks President Trump…but Senate is 50-50 and VP Biden selects VP Kaine….

    Most interesting scenario

  3. Spencer

    But what if the House cannot decide and the Vice-President and President cannot act as president? Then it’s dueling pistols on the flip of a Spanish 8 Reales at Hamilton’s grave for all we know.

    1. Anonymous

      LOL–Spencer…it is interesting history….as House does vote 1 vote per state ; which is unique and new sworn in senate picks VP…be real interesting if VP Biden would pick Kaine as it would give Dems control of the chamber….and yes acting VP would be President until the House resolves it

      1. duggersd

        And that is why John Adams was the first acting President of the USA. Washington was sworn in several days later.