Attorney General Jackley Releases Draft Explanation for Proposed One Subject Constitutional Amendment
PIERRE, S.D. – South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley has released a draft ballot explanation that would remove the provision that a proposed constitutional amendment can cover only one subject.
State law requires the Attorney General to draft a title and explanation for each initiated measure, initiated constitutional amendment, constitutional amendment proposed by the Legislature, or referred measure that may appear on an election ballot. The Attorney General’s explanation is meant to be an “objective, clear, and simple summary” intended to “educate the voters of the purpose and effect of the proposed” measure, as well as identify the “legal consequences” of each measure.
State law requires the Attorney General to draft a title and explanation that may appear on an election ballot. Attorney General Jackley’s draft explanation on this proposed amendment can found here.
Currently, the state Constitution limits all proposed constitutional amendments to just one subject. This proposed amendment would remove the one subject provision from the Constitution.
Once the Attorney General has filed and posted the draft explanation, the public has 10 days to provide written comment. The explanation was filed Monday, March 13, and the deadline for comments on this amendment explanation is March 23, 2023, at the close of business in Pierre, South Dakota. The final explanation is due to the Secretary of State on April 3, 2023.
The draft amendment would require 35,017 valid petition signatures to qualify for the 2024 general election ballot.
To file written comments on a draft Attorney General’s explanation please use one of the following methods below. Copies of all received comments will be posted on this website.
Comments may be submitted via mail, or through hand delivery, to the Attorney General’s Office at:
Office of the Attorney General
Ballot Comment
1302 E. Hwy. 14, Suite 1
Pierre, SD 57501
Comments that are hand delivered must be received by the close of business in Pierre, South Dakota, by March 23, 2023. Comments that are mailed must be received by the Attorney General’s Office before the deadline expires to be accepted.
Comments may also be emailed to [email protected] by March 23, 2023. Comments should be clearly expressed in the body of the email. The Attorney General’s Office will not open attachments in an effort to prevent malware or other digital threats. Please include your name and contact information when submitting your comment. The title of the comment must be included in the subject line of the email.
-30-
This sounds like too many issues, I can’t follow.
Having more than 1 topic per proposed (insert targeted document here) amendment, means something unwanted can be added to something wanted/needed and it would pass because it was attached to the wanted/needed.
That’s NOT being transparent. That’s being manipulative.
This is not a good proposal. I agree with Veda.
Legislators should have listened when we told them to define what “single subject” means. Instead, they left it vague – a constitution is no place for vague language. That just delegates governing to judges instead of our elected representatives who are supposed to do that work. They were lazy, and now we have this.