Shipping oil by carrier pigeon isn’t a good solution. It’s past time to get the pipelines underway.

There was a press story recently, regarding the pipes that the builders of the Dakota Access pipeline are stockpiling west of Aberdeen in anticipation of beginning construction sometime in 2016.

It shouldn’t come as a shock, as it’s fairly common for pipeline construction companies to stage pipe in the vicinity where construction will take place, as they have with the Keystone XL pipeline. For obvious reasons, as well as economics, the longer you wait to build something, the higher expenses for construction materials goes up. It happens all the time in school and municipal projects, and it’s the same with private enterprise.

If it’s cheaper by millions to buy now versus in a year, and it only costs tens of thousands to store it, the economics work pretty well. That’s just good business.

Predictably, despite companies trying to keep an eye on the bottom line, South Dakota’s nattering liberal class is mewling about a pipeline company (how dare they) preparing for moving forward:

Dakota Access has rented land from a farmer six miles west of Aberdeen to stockpile pipe for the Bakken oil pipeline, which is planned to run northwest to southeast across East River… assuming, of course, that the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission permits the pipeline to be built… which it hasn’t yet… which would make ordering 200 to 300 miles of steel rather premature, wouldn’t you think?

Read it here.

Absent a pipeline, what else is there?  Rail?  That’s all well and good aside from the fact that it diverts rail cars away from transporting grain and other ag goods to market.  And the tendency for rail cars to explode every once in a while. Or so.

In fact, some people think they explode often enough that they made a special report about it.

So, liberals think pipelines are bad, and oil trains are bad.  Unfortunately there are problems with other options.

#1 – No one is exploring sending oil by sustainable and renewable carrier pigeons.

#2 – The only sensible solution to transport oil is via pipeline.

Are pipelines perfect? No. Are they far better than rail cars? Yes, and pipeline safety constantly and continually improves, in addition to them moving far, far more oil. As noted in an article on CNBC last month, after one of the recent oil-car explosions:

Monday’s derailment of a CSX train carrying oil in West Virginia has reignited the debate about the cheapest and safest way to move oil across the country.

Diana Furchtgott-Roth, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, told CNBC’s “Power Lunch” on Tuesday “if that oil had been carried by pipeline there would not have been this accident.”

“The advantage of pipeline is that the container is stationary and the product moves through it and it’s much safer than rail or truck, according to Department of Transportation statistics,” she said. “We need to put human lives above all of this.”

Read that here.    Forbes, weighed in as well:

Of note, analysts say that it can cost as much as five times more to transport oil by rail than it does pipe, for moderate to long distances.

and…

So, is it safer to send hazardous liquids by railway or by pipeline? Without a doubt, both modes of transportation could be improved and given more oversight. But the reality is that energy consumption is on the rise and that each method is necessary to meet market demand, although moving it by pipelines can be much cheaper and more efficient.

Read that here. And here’s what the Washington Post had to say:

So it’s pretty clear here that moving oil by pipe is a less risky proposition than moving it by rail. Both the rate of accidents and the total amount of spillage varies less for pipe transport than for rail transport. To the extent that we can shift some of that transportation burden from rails to pipes, we can drastically lower the odds of spill incidents, and potentially lower the overall volume of oil spilled as well.

Read it here.

Yes, transport by rail IS getting better, and will continue to do so in the future. But it’s still not as good, nor as efficient as transport by pipeline. And we also need to deal with ‘the today,’ not how things will be in five or ten years’ time.

And we can’t ignore our particular needs as far as South Dakota is concerned; The agriculture aspect is an argument equal with safety for shifting the transport of oil from rail cars into pipelines:

…for grain farmers and grain elevator operators in states like Minnesota and the Dakotas, it’s a near disastrous crisis that could continue to cost them tens of millions of dollars.

The reason: A lack of available railroad service—from rail cars to track lines—to ship the grain to market.

and…

“I’m losing money and my hands are tied,” said Tim Luken, general manager and grain merchandiser at Oahe Grain, a grain elevator operator in Onida, South Dakota.

He said his grain elevator has a 5.7 million bushel capacity but can’t take any more grain as the harvest season enters a big push.

Luken said that it costs $5,000 a day to keep his operations open and because the crops are not being shipped, he can’t make room for new grains to buy or sell them.

“The farmers and grain elevator operators are at the mercy of the railroads, said Luken. “And with commodity prices falling, profits are very thin.”

Read that here.

South Dakota ag producers need rail cars. South Dakotans, and Americans, need inexpensive, affordable energy. The more we have refined, produced, and sent to market benefits us all. And the best way to accomplish that is to approve and complete Keystone XL, and to do the same for the Dakota Access pipeline.

It’s past time to secure our nation’s energy future. Let’s get the pipelines underway.

Is it me, or is the OST Council starting to sound a little too much like a middle eastern country?

Is it me, or does the string of Pine Ridge tribal ‘bans’  seem a little too much like what happens in middle eastern countries, as they’ve first banned the attorney of the man accused of spilling beer on kids, and now have banned the Rapid City Journal because they wrote a headline that angered them? (and later apologized for)

From a past issue of USA Today:

The Moroccan government has banned an issue of the French magazine L’Express International, claiming it insults Islam in articles exploring the relationship between that religion and Christianity.

Information Minister Khalid Naciri said Sunday that he had no choice but to ban the current issue because of the offensive nature of the articles it contained. The minister said the kingdom’s press code allows the government to shut down or ban any publication deemed to offend Islam or the king.

Read that here.

And from the Argus Leader, yesterday:

The Oglala Sioux Tribal Council has approved a resolution banning all businesses on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation from selling the Rapid City Journal after the newspaper published a headline the tribe found objectionable.

Tribal spokesman Kevin Steele told KCSR-AM that the ban will stay in effect until the newspaper apologizes for a headline that questioned whether a group of Native American students stood for the pledge of allegiance at a Rapid City Rush hockey game.

Read that here.

The last time I checked, tribes were governed by federal law.  But, apparently the OST governing council doesn’t think the bill of rights applies to them, specifically freedom of the press.

What are your thoughts?

So, what’s going on out there?

I’m sitting at a coffee shop in Sioux Falls waiting for a meeting that had to be pushed back, reflecting on the happenings of the day.

What have I heard today?

I heard that SD politico Chris Hupke may have signed on to work for the Trump presidential effort. (No word if they all have to wear their hair like that).

Patrick Davis has responded to the story attacking he and SD attorney Joel Arends. Apparently the source publication is a George Soros org:

Patrick Davis released the following statement in response to the story which first appeared in the radical leftist George Soros funded ProPublica online publication.

“I am pleased to announce that Person to Person PAC, Red State Productions, Patrick Davis Consulting, Italia Federici and Joel Arends have resolved their differences with Vote 2 Reduce Debt in an amicable settlement following our work together in 2014 to raise public awareness of America’s spiraling national debt and the importance of electing Senators and Congressman who pledged, if elected, to take steps to reverse the nation’s path to financial and fiscal ruin.

Recently, each of us was contacted by Pro Publica reporter Robert Fateruchi, who was apparently being fed false and misleading allegations against and/or about our efforts, our work, our project and/or our relationship(s) with one another – in a seeming attempt to discredit our legitimate efforts to change the course of America’s out-of-control spending.

These allegations include misquoted sources and fabricated quotes in an effort by Mr. Fateruchi and Pro Publica to malign the reputations of all parties involved in this important cause, as a means, no doubt, of furthering Pro Publica’s leftist agenda that we were involved in defeating in 2014. Pro Publica is nothing more than an arm of the radical George Soros-funded network of liberal media outlets formed to attack, defame, and undermine legitimate activities of committed conservatives.

This should be a lesson to all conservative activists and consultants standing, working and speaking in the public arena. When you are effective the left will attack you. Be prepared to fight. No good deed goes unpunished.

It is my prayer that God will bless Ken Davis and his family with good health, happiness and prosperity and that God will bless the United States of America and the conservative patriots standing, working and speaking for freedom and liberty against tyranny and evil.”

I’m also hearing (and seeing) that things are kind of slow politically at the moment.

What are you hearing out there?

Thune at Ag Hearing: Waters of the U.S. Rule Prime Example of EPA Overreach

Thune at Ag Hearing: Waters of the U.S. Rule Prime Example of EPA Overreach

“Waters of the U.S. rule is another example of what has become an all-too-common practice of this administration to reach into the lives, livelihoods, and pocketbooks of the American people it is supposed to be helping.”

WASHINGTON, D.C.—U.S. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) today sharply criticized the Obama Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) controversial Waters of the U.S. rule at hearing before the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee entitled, “Waters of the United States: Stakeholder Perspectives on the Impact of EPA’s Proposed Rule.” Thune noted that the EPA’s overreach has generated so much concern and controversy that stakeholders have weighed in with over a million comments to the proposed rule.

Video of Thune statement is available here.

“[W]hat concerns me the most about this EPA proposed Waters of the U.S. rule is that it is another example of what has become an all-too-common practice of this administration to reach into the lives, livelihoods, and pocketbooks of the American people it is supposed to be helping.

“Even before this rule is finalized, the cost of just the proposed rule to the people it is supposed to be helping is staggering. Think about the amount of time taken for respondents to file over a million comments to the proposed rule, the number Congressional hearings including this one, and individuals, small businesses and county and state governments who have worked hard to keep this rule from destroying their livelihoods has cost already millions of dollars to counter a government that was created to be of assistance.”

##

Rounds Applauds FAA’s Approval of Powder River Training Complex Expansion for Ellsworth Air Force Base

Rounds Applauds FAA’s Approval of Powder River Training Complex Expansion for Ellsworth Air Force Base

WASHINGTON – U.S. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, today applauded the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) announcement that it has approved the Air Force’s proposed expansion of the Powder River Training Complex (PRTC). PRTC encompasses air space over South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming. This is the last step in the expansion process.

“I commend the collaborative efforts of the Air Force and the FAA, who have worked diligently to see this important project through,” said Rounds. “The expansion of PRTC will not only provide additional air space for our men and women in uniform to train for combat, it will save Ellsworth Air Force Base millions of dollars a year in fuel costs. Completion of the project solidifies the critical role Ellsworth plays – and will continue to play – in military readiness and national defense.”

###

Gov. Daugaard’s Statement On PRTC Expansion

Gov. Daugaard’s Statement On PRTC Expansion

PIERRE, S.D. – Gov. Dennis Daugaard issued the following statement today commending the Federal Aviation Administration’s decision to approve the Air Force’s expansion of the Powder River Training Complex.

“I am pleased that the Powder River Training Complex has finally been approved,” Gov. Daugaard said. “This expanded airspace will provide tremendous benefits to the Air Force, including the servicemen and women stationed at Ellsworth Air Force Base. I appreciate the efforts of Sen. Thune, the Ellsworth Development Authority, the Ellsworth Task Force and others as we worked with the Department of Defense to bring this project to fruition.”

-30-

SD CR’s to host Michelle Malkin at 2015 State CR convention on May 2

 

BROOKINGS, S.D.–The South Dakota College Republicans announce that blogger, columnist, and #1 New York Times bestselling author Michelle Malkin will be headlining the 2015 College Republican Convention at South Dakota State University.

 

Malkin will deliver a speech at the SDSU Performing Arts Center 7:00 p.m. on Saturday, May 2 that is free and open to the public.  The event is being hosted by the College Republicans and is co-sponsored with Young America’s Foundation.

 

“We are thrilled to bring someone of Michelle’s talent, experience, and political insight to South Dakota,” said State College Republicans Chairman Joe Schartz.  “Her story should bring people of all political beliefs to SDSU, and we especially hope that students will be interested in hearing about her journey as a conservative writer.”

 

Malkin is similarly excited to bring her message to the convention.  “I can’t wait to visit South Dakota State University and share my story of how and why I believe conservative principles are best for protecting and enhancing individual freedom and prosperity. I’m thrilled by the invitation of the South Dakota College Republicans and impressed with their activism and engagement,” she said.

 

Members of the public interested in reserving seats for the free event are encouraged to RSVP at: https://eventbrite.com/event/16170985854/

 

State Republican Chairman Pam Roberts expects the event to be well attended. “I am proud of our College Republicans for hosting Michelle Malkin and generating interest in political discussion in South Dakota,” said Roberts.

 

Malkin began her career in newspaper journalism with the Los Angeles Daily News, where she worked as an editorial writer and weekly columnist from 1992-94. In 1995, she was named Warren Brookes Fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C. In 1996, she joined the editorial board of the Seattle Times, where she penned editorials and weekly columns for three and a half years. 

 

She has been a nationally syndicated columnist for Creators Syndicate since 1999. Her twice-weekly column is carried by the New York Post, National Review, Townhall.com, and many other newspapers and websites. 

 

Her first book, Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists Criminals & Other Foreign Menaces to Our Shores, published in 2002, was a New York Times bestseller. Her most recent book, Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks, and Cronies, was #1 on the New York Times hardcover non-fiction bestseller list for six weeks in a row. 

 

She has founded three successful conservative websites: michellemalkin.comHotAir.com (sold to Salem Communications in 2010), and Twitchy.com (sold to Salem Communications in 2013). 

 

The daughter of Filipino immigrants, Malkin was born in Philadelphia, Pa., in 1970 and was raised in southern New Jersey. She has worked as a press inserter, tax preparation aide, and network news librarian. She is also a lapsed classical pianist. 

 

She lives with her husband and two children in Colorado Springs, Colo.

 

Thune Introduces Bill to Extend Successful Sport Fish & Boating Fund

Thune Introduces Bill to Extend Successful Sport Fish & Boating Fund

-Bill scheduled for Commerce Committee mark-up this week-

 

WASHINGTON, D.C.—U.S. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), the committee’s ranking member, today introduced S. 834 to reauthorize through Fiscal Year 2023 the Sport Fish Restoration and Boating Trust Fund, which has benefitted millions of anglers and fishermen since 1950. 

 

“This program helps ensure our natural water resources receive needed care so that they remain available for the use and enjoyment of generations to come,” said Thune. “Sport fishermen and recreational boaters value and support this trust fund that allocates funds to protect wetlands, restore fisheries, and support a national recreational boating safety program.”

“Keeping our beaches, lakes and rivers clean and abundant with fish is about protecting our economy and fragile environment,” Nelson said. “It’s also about leaving a lasting legacy for future generations.” 


The program collects user fees on fishing tackle and equipment, motorboat fuel, imported boats and fishing equipment, and small engines, raising roughly $600 million per year. The money in the fund is then allocated to federal and state programs for boating safety and infrastructure, fishery management, habitat conservation, and related programs and activities. Last Congress, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the bill “would not affect revenues.” 


According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Sport Fish Restoration and Boating Trust Fund authorizes annual distribution for the following:

 

The remaining funds are allocated to the following programs according to the Act:

 

Click here to read S. 834. The Sport Fish Restoration and Recreational Boating Safety Act is scheduled for consideration by the Commerce Committee on Wednesday, March 25, 2015.

 

###

Noem Introduces Legislation to Prevent FWS from Listing Long-Eared Bat as an Endangered Species

Noem Introduces Legislation to Prevent FWS from
Listing Long-Eared Bat as an Endangered Species

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Rep. Kristi Noem today introduced legislation to prevent the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) from listing the long-eared bat as an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act.  Senator Thune introduced the language in the Senate earlier this year.

“It’s widely understood that the long-eared bat’s depopulation is not due to habitat changes, but white-nose syndrome,” said Rep. Noem.  “Focusing on habitat, as the Fish and Wildlife Service proposal and corresponding guidance does, pulls critical and limited resources from the real threats facing the long-eared bat, while also endangering more than 1,500 jobs in the Black Hills area.  Any effort to preserve the species must focus on the disease, not on fulfilling an unproven environmental agenda that could jeopardize South Dakota jobs and turn parts of the Black Hills into a tinder box.”

Listing the long-eared bat as endangered and pursuing regulatory restrictions on forest management could effectively end active management in the Black Hills National Forest, which will cause declining forest health, increase the likelihood of large-scale wildfires, and severely impact the timber industry in the Black Hills. On October 14, 2014, Rep. Noem and Sen. Thune sent a letter to the FWS encouraging the agency to withdraw its proposed listing of the northern long-eared bat as endangered and to refocus its attention on combating white-nose syndrome.

###