Category: Uncategorized

Tragedies Felt In South Dakota
A column by Gov. Dennis Daugaard:

Flags across South Dakota have been at half-staff for most of the last two weeks. Following the violence perpetrated in Dallas, France and Baton Rouge, President Obama issued three consecutive proclamations calling for the lowering of the flag. Even though our state has not been directly affected by this recent senseless violence, we are not untouched. We too feel the losses, and we mourn with the rest of the nation.

The assassinations of police officers in Texas and Louisiana weigh particularly heavily on our hearts. The sad events in these cities have reminded me how critically important our state, local and tribal law enforcement officers are to our communities, and that they deserve our appreciation.

The vast majority of those who enforce our laws live selfless lives. They’re courageous, hardworking and dedicated individuals. They work long hours and willingly put themselves in harm’s way to protect us. They don’t know what they’ll encounter when they approach a vehicle or knock on a door. Their spouses and children make sacrifices as well, adjusting to the hours of the job and assuming brave faces when their loved one responds to an emergency call.

Still, law enforcement officers are not perfect. Sometimes they make mistakes, and unfortunately, there will always be a few who do not represent their profession well. But just as it is unacceptable for police to stereotype or target individuals based on the color of one’s skin, individuals should not stereotype police officers based on a few bad actors. Stereotyping is wrong and individuals should rather be judged individually and slowly. When mistakes are made, deliberate processes must be followed to review the facts, and legal consequences must be assigned as justified by those facts. Vigilante justice has no place in a civilized society.

It is because of the men and women who enforce our laws that we live in a free and civil society. There are many places in the world today where people live in chaos and face daily uncertainty over whether they’ll be able to protect themselves and their families. Because of our law enforcement officers, South Dakota is not one of those places.

As we mourn the senseless loss of life, occurring in so many places this year, let us also resolve to express our support and appreciation to those who protect us from violence.  Let us show respect for the law and for each other, and convey our appreciation to those who put their lives on the line to protect us.

-30-

I caught part of Donald Trump’s speech last night, and I have to admit, there were a few things I liked. This was the first time I’d heard some of the things I’d wanted to hear from the candidate regarding jobs, taxation, energy policy, etcetera. If he continues campaigning based on his promise of improving our nation’s business climate, He may be able to unify the GOP behind him.

What do you think?

New Defeat 22 Mailer Exposes Facts About Measure 22

Mailer to thousands of South Dakotans shows how they will be forced to support politicians and their campaigns

Sioux Falls, S.D. – Today Defeat22, the coalition opposing Initiated Measure 22 for forcing South Dakotans to fund political campaigns, sent mailers to South Dakotans explaining how the measure will force them to fund political campaigns. This is the second mailer sent by the coalition to thousands of South Dakotans to explain the issue.

Click here to see the mailer.

“Ask any South Dakotan – your parents, your siblings, your spouse, your coworkers, your best friend – they almost all agree: taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to pay for political ads and robocalls,”explained Ben Lee, spokesman for the Defeat22 Coalition. “South Dakotans overwhelmingly oppose spending tax dollars on politicians and their political campaigns. It’s a no-brainer: dumping tax dollars into our political campaigns won’t fix any problems, but it will spend our hard-earned money on obnoxious political ads and robocalls while we are eating dinner. Defeat 22 to stop politicians from getting to spend our money on their political campaigns.”

Defeat22 is a coalition of South Dakota businesses, charities, and political organizations who agree that taxpayers shouldn’t fund political campaigns. Earlier this month they announced a new radio ad, mailer, and grassroots door knocking effort. The coalition plans to continue heavy grassroots advocacy and paid media over the next four months.

For a supposedly a smart guy, Ted Cruz can do some really dumb things and last night we saw it.  Donald Trump isn’t a person who lets by-gones be by-gones.

For a supposedly man of high personal morals, Ted Cruz can do some really ill-mannered things and last night we saw it.  Whether the Convention is “Donald Trump’s House” or the “Party’s House,” the Convention wasn’t “Ted Cruz’s House.”  He lost the primary in decisive fashion and was only given the right to speak by invitation.  I don’t recall ever getting my face slapped by my mom but if I went to another’s house and did what he did, I am pretty sure I’d have gotten the proverbial slap across the face.

The Washington Times is reporting three days ago Donald Trump was told direct by Ted Cruz that he wasn’t going give an endorsement.  My gut is Cruz was expecting Trump would respond by rescinding Cruz’ speaking slot and Cruz would be made a martyr upon which Cruz would launch his 2020 Presidential Race.

Trump instead didn’t respond as expected-  Gave Ted his moment in the spotlight.

And, in the end, Trump came across as the bigger man and Ted Cruz slithered off the stage.

Sidenote:  Cruz said this morning the reason he didn’t endorse admitting it is personal, referring to Trump’s attack on Cruz’ wife and father during the primary.   Ted’s decision to make a national convention the battlefield for a personal matter.  Ted can expect the same from those who have grudges against him.  Death by a thousand nicks is a painful death.

The Washington Post is profiling South Dakota’s senior US Senator John Thune today, as they discuss where he’s likely to land in the Senate’s hierarchy in the post-November election Senate:

South Dakota Sen. John Thune, 55, will be reelected overwhelmingly in November, no matter what happens to Donald Trump or in the fight for Senate control. You can bet on it.

What is less clear is whether there is a place for Thune in the new Republican Party, and what kind of place that might be.

“You have to be prepared when opportunities come along,” Thune told me by phone this week from South Dakota, where he is touring the state rather than attending the Republican National Convention in Cleveland.

and…

Thune never pulled the trigger on that race, of course, and the senator suggested in another Politico piece early last year that his window for a presidential run may have already closed.

But Thune told me he has neither completely ruled out a future presidential bid nor given a bid any thought at all. “This year people were looking for someone to channel their frustration,” he remarked, all but acknowledging that is not his style.

Third, Thune is the chair of the Senate Republican Conference, making him the third-ranking Republican in the Senate. He also chairs the Senate’s Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, a committee that Arizona Sen. John McCain once used to boost his profile. In other words, Thune is very relevant on Capitol Hill.

and…

Thune, a member of the Senate Finance Committee, also says that if Congress ever turns its attention to big economic issues, he is ready to be a player.

“If we ever get to tax reform, I’d love to be in the middle of that fight,” he told me.

And finally, Thune is conservative but also is personable and likable — something in short supply for his party of late. As a candidate for higher office or a spokesman for his party, Thune would appeal to Republicans but also to those outside his party. He invariably sounds thoughtful, measured and reasonable.

Read it all here at the Washington Post.

Did you catch the part where the author notes “South Dakota Sen. John Thune, 55, will be reelected overwhelmingly in November”?  I suspect you can count on that pretty easily.

State Representative Isaac Latterell is taking hits from both the right and the left over his actions at the Republican National Convention which brought embarrassment to the Republican delegates attending the National Convention.

From Greg Belfrage:

I’ve had both criticism and praise for Donald Trump through-out the campaign, but he was definitely not my choice for nominee.

However, I would never have embarrassed the South Dakota GOP delegation and disrespected the state’s voters by clasping a hand over my face in a childish protest.

and…

“We did not think (Latterell’s face palm) was respectful to Pam (Roberts) as she was giving the announcement of our vote or respectful to the state,” he says. “It was a time for South Dakota to shine and to show the world what we represent, and that was a mark on it.”

and…

Latterell was dead wrong to slap a majority of South Dakota GOP voters in the face with a childish, petulant display during the state’s shining moment at the party’s national convention.

I expect better from our state GOP delegates.

I certainly expect better from our elected state representatives.

Read that here at KELO-AM.

And at the Argus Leader, Stu Whitney went after Latterell over his attention seeking antics:

As state GOP chairperson Pam Roberts announced that South Dakota’s 29 delegate votes would go to Trump, Latterell made sure he was visible on camera and dramatically covered his face with his hand, sparking a surge of social media attention for his “face palm” of protest.

and..

But it’s also accurate to say that Latterell, who voted for Ted Cruz in the state primary, doesn’t think Trump goes far enough when it comes to fire-and-brimstone stances on social issues such as abortion and LGBT rights.

The District 6 House member, first elected in 2012, has been an aggressive advocate of curtailing the reproductive rights of women in South Dakota and once saw fit to compare Planned Parenthood to ISIS.

and.

Latterell also failed to pass a provocatively titled Preborn Infant Beheading Ban in 2015, continuing a train of thought in which he compared a women’s reproductive rights to the killing of puppies, reinforced by a cute puppy picture on his blog.

Read it all here.

This is probably best summed up by a facebook comment I read this morning on the controversy from a Minnehaha County Republican who noted that the state only gets so many delegates who can attend convention. Isaac wanted to go and take part, taking a slot from others who wanted to go, all of whom participated in full knowledge of the rules.

Basically they said if he didn’t want to take part, he should have let someone else fill the spot, instead of denying them the opportunity to attend. I’m hearing from Republicans across the state – especially around Sioux Falls – who are unhappy over his antics.

While it might have given him a few minutes of Internet fame (or infamy, if you will), Latterell might find that politically, the blowback over his attention seeking move was not worth it.

If you know me, you know I sometimes like to stir the pot a bit.

And when it comes to the race for Governor in 2018, I enjoy the chatter on these posts, because it’s already inflaming the passions of political prognosticators. So, posts on the topic tend to stir the pot alot.

One question that’s come to mind recently is questioning where US Senator John Thune’s allegiances are going to lie in the upcoming Gubernatorial race. Because he has ties to all three of the major candidates vying for the big prize.

If you know Attorney General (And 2018 contender) Marty Jackley, you know he came to the Attorney Generals office by way of serving as the US Attorney for South Dakota during the Bush Years. Who nominated him for the office in 2006?

Newly minted US Senator John Thune, of course:

The White House on Thursday nominated Rapid City lawyer Marty Jackley as U.S. attorney for South Dakota, filling a post that has been open for more than a year.

The state has been without a permanent U.S. attorney since James McMahon left the office early last year to return to private practice. As the state’s only Republican senator, U.S. Sen. John Thune has been responsible for sending the candidate’s name to President Bush, who then nominates the person for confirmation by the U.S. Senate.

Read that here.

Kristi Noem, South Dakota’s current Congresswoman is spoken about contender for the Governor’s mansion in 2018, but of course she has this years’ congressional contest to get past first.   As one third of the Washington delegation, she clearly has a strong working relationship with the good Senator.

In fact, it’s so strong a relationship this year that they’re share a key staffer, Josh Shields. Josh is currently managing Senator Thune’s campaign, and managed Kristi Noem’s 2010 campaign to victory over incumbent Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin. Shields also used to be Noem’s Communications Director.

Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., has hired Joshua Shields to be his campaign manager, the aide confirmed to CQ Roll Call Tuesday.

Shields is a South Dakota native who worked on Thune’s 2002 and 2004 races and in his Senate office.

In 2010, he was the campaign manager for Rep. Kristi Noem, R-S.D., in her first bid for Congress against former Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin.

Read that here.

And finally, here’s one I noticed the other day when I was perusing the latest FEC filings from the candidates, specifically in reference to 2018 Gubernatorial contender Mark Mickelson.

If you’re not familiar with Senator Thune’s campaign organization, officially, it’s called Friends of John Thune – and it has been his primary campaign committee for years.

Who is the treasurer for the long-standing political wing of the Thune organization? Someone with a particularly close association with State Representative Mickelson…. and one who might just be First Lady after the 2018 election:

So, which candidate will Senator Thune pick for the 2016 election? They’re all pretty darned good.

To answer the question, in all seriousness, it’s most likely that the Senator will defer to the GOP electorate at large & let them pick who they will.

And in any case, I suspect it will be easy for Senator Thune to support whoever wins, especially since they all have a long history together, no matter which one wins the primary!

Rounds Joins 69 Colleagues in Letter to CFPB Requesting Changes to Banking Regulations

Urges Colleagues to Cosponsor his TAILOR Act 

PIERRE—U.S. Senator Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) joined 69 of his fellow senators in a letter to Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Director Richard Cordray, requesting the CFPB tailor its regulations to match the risk profile of credit unions and community banks when crafting regulations. Last week, Rounds introduced the TAILOR Act, which would require federal regulatory agencies, including the CFPB, to take similar steps to make sure the agencies consider the risk profile and business models of individual financial institutions and tailor those regulations accordingly.

“In both good economic times and bad, community banks and credit unions serve as pillars of their communities, providing the capital and access to credit that families and small businesses need to grow,” wrote the senators. “We agree that it is important for consumers to be empowered to take more control over their economic lives, and that bad actors should be rooted out of the financial marketplace. However, the CFPB must also consider its impact on community-based depository lenders, who are essential to spurring economic growth and prosperity at a local level, and not disrupt the good work of community lenders to help someone start a business, buy a home or car, or put their kids through college.” 

Rounds also urged his colleagues to cosponsor the TAILOR Act: “Similarly, my TAILOR Act would codify into law the requirement that federal agencies, CFPB included, tailor their regulations by taking into consideration the risk profile and business models of individual financial institutions. I am pleased so many of my colleagues agree that federal regulators should tailor their regulations for smaller financial institutions so they can focus their resources on taking care of their customers, rather than spending time and money on regulatory compliance. I welcome them to cosponsor the TAILOR Act.”

The letter was led by Sens. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) and Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.), and signed by Sens. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), John Boozman (R-Ark.), Richard Burr (R-N.C.), Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), Bob Casey (D-Pa.), Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Dan Coats (R-Ind.), Thad Cochran (R-Miss.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Bob Corker (R-Tenn.),  John Cornyn (R-Texas), Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.), Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), Cory Gardner (R-Colo.), Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.), Dean Heller (R-Nev.), John Hoeven (R-N.D.), James Inhofe (R-Okla.), Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Angus King (I-Maine), Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.),  James Lankford (R-Okla.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), John McCain (R-Ariz.), Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), David Perdue (R-Ga.), Gary Peters (D-Mich.), Rob Portman (R-Ohio), James Risch (R-Idaho), Pat Roberts (R-Kan.), Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska), Jon Tester (D-Mont.), John Thune (R-S.D.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), Tom Udall (D-N.M.), David Vitter (R-La.), Mark Warner (D-Va.) and Roger Wicker (R-Miss.). 

Full text of the letter: 

The Honorable Richard Cordray
Director
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)
1700 G Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20552 

Dear Director Cordray,

In both good economic times and bad, community banks and credit unions serve as pillars of their communities, providing the capital and access to credit that families and small businesses need to grow. That is why Congress and federal regulators have long taken the approach that credit unions and community banks should be treated differently from the largest financial institutions and non-bank lenders. It is our hope that the CFPB also takes this approach and considers the impact of its rule-making on smaller financial institutions and consumers. We request that the CFPB carefully tailor its regulations to match the unique nature of community banks and credit unions. 

As it has now been more than six years since the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), there are many new rules and regulations in place. We must ensure that credit unions and community banks are not unduly burdened by compliance, but rather have the ability to maintain their close relationships and continue to offer a wide variety of consumer financial products and services.   

We agree that it is important for consumers to be empowered to take more control over their economic lives, and that bad actors should be rooted out of the financial marketplace. However, the CFPB must also consider its impact on community-based depository lenders, who are essential to spurring economic growth and prosperity at a local level, and not disrupt the good work of community lenders to help someone start a business, buy a home or car, or put their kids through college. Since we all recognize these community lenders were not the primary cause of the financial crisis, the CFPB must carefully tailor its rulemaking.  

Dodd-Frank explicitly granted the CFPB the authority to tailor regulations in Section 1022(b)(3)(A) by allowing the CFPB to “exempt any class” of entity from its regulatory requirements. We believe the CFPB has robust tailoring authority and ask that you act accordingly to prevent any unintended consequences that negatively impact community banks and credit unions or unnecessarily limit their ability to serve consumers. 

Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to working with you on this important matter. 

###

One of the anonymous commenters turned from his desk at Democrat or the Williams for Senate Headquarters (we can only assume) and tapped out the following comment on his phone:

So, where will we see Sen. Thune during August recess? Why not with his weekly column provide his schedule of where we can see the senator? What events/appearances/town hall events are planned? Anything?? For a senator promoting that he wants to be hearing from us, why are events/appearances so hard to find? Or is nothing planned?

The thing is, this person could not be farther from the truth if they tried. I note this, because unlike the impression they’re trying to give, Senator Thune is out on the road listening to constituents during August recess.

I know, because at least for many Senate functions, they do send out press advisories, in case we in the media would like to pop over and cover it.  (Sometimes when I’m free and they’re in the area, I even make it out to do it.)   But never assume Thune or any of our delegation is home watching TV. They’re typically out on the road traveling hard.

Such as two days ago, when Thune was in Mobridge & Onida…

Thune in Mobridge, Onida Today

WASHINGTON — Today U.S. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) will travel to Mobridge to address the Mobridge Rotary Club before heading to Onida to tour the Onida Clinic.

Today, July 18:
WHAT:Mobridge Rotary Club
WHEN:12:00 p.m. CDT
WHERE:Moose Lodge, Shore Acres – 1109 West Grand Crossing – Mobridge, S.D.

WHAT:Onida Clinic Tour
WHEN:3:30 p.m. CDT
WHERE:303 South Main Streetv- Onida, S.D.

Or yesterday, when Senator Thune was in Eagle Butte:

Thune in Eagle Butte Tomorrow

WASHINGTON — Tomorrow U.S. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) will travel to Eagle Butte to be briefed by Cheyenne River Sioux tribal leadership on housing, education, and law enforcement issues, as well as the ongoing crisis at the Indian Health Service (IHS).

In May, Thune introduced the IHS Accountability Act, which would bring greater accountability and transparency to the federal agency tasked with providing health care to tribal members throughout the Great Plains.

Tuesday, July 19:
WHAT:Meeting With Cheyenne River Sioux Tribal Leadership
WHEN:11:30 a.m. MDT
WHERE:Tribal Headquarters – Eagle Butte, S.D.

Or today, when he’s spending time in Pierre…

Thune in Pierre Tomorrow

WASHINGTON — Tomorrow U.S. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) will travel to Pierre to be briefed on Missouri River issues at the State Capitol before meeting with local law enforcement officials and touring the Law Enforcement Training Center.

Wednesday, July 20:

WHAT:Missouri River Briefing
WHEN:11:00 a.m. CDT
WHERE: State Capitol – 500 East Capitol Avenue – Pierre, S.D.

WHAT:Law Enforcement Training Center Meeting and Tour
WHEN:1:00 p.m. CDT
WHERE:Criminal Justice Training Center – 1302 East Highway 14, Suite 5 – Pierre, S.D.

###

While they might not post a calendar weeks ahead of time, Senator Thune (and the rest of our delegation) are scheduled pretty extensively during their time off from Washington business. That’s why they have both an in-state, and DC scheduler.  They’re that busy, and quite in demand for their time.

I don’t know that you’ll ever see a comprehensive calendar posted, as unfortunately, in today’s world, many times comprehensive calendars are not released in order to prevent someone from trying to do harm to public officials.

But don’t take that to mean they’re not out there pounding the pavement listening to what people say. That type of false cynicism is reserved for political operatives trying to make hay where none exists.