From KELOLAND:
A Minnesota volunteer firefighter says he’s been suspended for flying a confederate flag from an engine during a holiday parade, and that he expects to be asked to resign.
and..
Neilsen says he flew the flag because he’s fed up with political correctness and didn’t realize how much trouble it would cause.
Read it here.
Well, that probably wasn’t the smartest thing to do, given it was his employer’s truck and not his to stage his protest against political correctness. And I don’t recall that Albert Lea Minnesota has ever been noted as a hotbed of confederate support. But I suspect it’s less that the man wanted to express a rebel yell, followed with a “don’t-cha-know” as much as make a statement against what seems to be an overreaching sense of hyper-sensitivity that infects our nation at this point in our history.
Ever since the media latched on to an image of a man who tragically killed several black church goers posing with a confederate flag, the flag has become a lightning rod and a symbol for racism in our society, and it’s instantly being erased in every context imaginable. It’s probably not the only time someone of ill-repute has posed with it, but for some reason, banning it has become the de facto response to prove one’s self as not being racist.
150 years after the war, should it be flown over statehouses? I’d argue no. It really doesn’t have a place among our state or national symbols. But, as a nation, the fact remains it was part of our history, and we should be able to display it in that context. Ever since the civil war, it has also been a symbol of rebellion and nonconformity. Some would say it’s display is more of a statement of “Don’t tread on me” as opposed to “we need to secede again.”
But in our society where we’ve now made up the term “Microagressions,” and include notations of America as the land of opportunity as a microagression, the banning of the flag has quickly moved to full blown hysteria. I think the flag banning movement showed it’s extremes when the Apple Store went so far as to ban the confederate flag in games about the civil war:
“We have removed apps from the App Store that use the Confederate flag in offensive or mean-spirited ways, which is in violation of our guidelines,” a spokesperson said to BuzzFeed News. The company denied issuing a blanket ban however, stating that the flag can be shown for “educational or historical uses.”
The decision has, however, forced a number of American Civil War games off of the App Store, even though developers insist the Confederate flag was only used to be historically accurate.
Sources told BuzzFeed that Apple is working with affected game developers to get their apps back in the App Store. The company is reportedly asking them to remove or replace the offending flag, however.
Read that here.
So, how exactly does one re-enact the civil war without the confederate flag? And how exactly does banning the flag in that context make any headway in bridging the racial divide in this country?
Are we that far gone that we now have to call one side the shirts and the other side the skins? I’m not sure how they’re going to digitally replace the flag on top of the Dukes of Hazzard car to render the show airable again, but when you see things like that, I can maybe even sympathize a little with the firefighter in Albert Lea, Minnesota.
It doesn’t seem ‘Minnesota’s Confederate Flag guy’ was endorsing a symbol he thought racist. It seems he was protesting a society deep in the grip of a hysteria to ban ideas and symbols, as opposed to solving real problems.
For better or worse, the confederate flag is part of our history as a nation. If we as a society have people pressing to ban the use of a flag even in historical contexts, that should trouble us far more than whether it’s plastered on the top of a car in a TV show, or it’s used to represent the rebels in a civil war re-enactment video game.
And it does nothing to solve the root problems of racism in this country. That’s where the real focus should be.