Is South Dakota allowed to produce any energy? House member doesn’t seem to think so.

From Twitter:

Noting that it’s North Dakota with the oil reserves and South Dakota has ethanol production, breezy plains and open skies, someone should ask radical anti-energy activist and State Representative Brandei Schefbauer exactly what energy we’re allowed to produce in the state, since she’s opposed to the big three that people who own large tracts of land are allowed to produce income from?

She doesn’t want South Dakota ethanol to be able to compete in the world market. She doesn’t want landowners to permit wind turbines. And she doesn’t want landowners to allow for solar panels.  It’s as bad as an HOA Karen telling people that their grass is getting too long, and they have to have a certain color blinds in their windows.

If land owners want to lease their land for wind or solar, that should be their business.

30 thoughts on “Is South Dakota allowed to produce any energy? House member doesn’t seem to think so.”

  1. She is also saying no to millions in potential property tax revenue for counties. I can’t wait to hear her plan for property tax relief. Saying no to energy projects means the property tax burden will only increase for local homeowners and small businesses.

    1. .50 cents per foot to the counties sure could have been a nice start to some property tax relief. Too bad we threw that away

      1. Her home county would get a couple million a year in property taxes. Hard to want vouchers but no money to pay for it

    1. Now we have Hansen, Odenbach, Schaefbauer, Lems, May, Overweg, Greenfield, Pischke, Howard, Gosch, and the like,

      S–t storm a coming.

  2. NO to energy?
    I’ll bet she likes it when the lights turn on.
    We are indeed entering a dim future for SD.
    Mostly mentally with this new legislature.

  3. “Let’s ruin the beauty of South Dakota with a CO2 pipeline”. She understands that the pipelines run below ground and can’t be seen, right? When do we get to start calling the anti-ag, anti-energy, anti-industry, anti-job, anti-growth people RINOs?

  4. Good thing that district gets all the heft it needs from Senator Carl Perry. Brandei should focus on matters other than energy production and transportation. The scourge of liberals and rino’s in her Republican caucus should be what concerns her and her patriotic brethren. Zero quarter to those who favor free enterprise.

    1. Heft?? ooookay check your records there, buddy. He’s as crazy as she is. Same voting record and caliber of crazy statements coming from Hefty Mr Perry. Good try tho

  5. Ah yes, anything that has any connection to “green” is bad. Diversification of energy and having options is a good thing, unless you are a cave man, or cave woman in this case.

  6. Ahhh yes, anything that has any connection to “green” is bad. Diversification of energy and having options is a good thing, unless you are a cave man, or cave woman in this case. It’s going to be fun watching Trump voters struggle the next 4 years while they raise their taxes to fund the wealthy tax cuts.

  7. This blog is a classic example of why people have turned away from the Democrat party and the Neocon Republicans. All the party hacks that hate on others cause they fear losing their place in the party. the establishment has been losing for more than a decade now.

  8. We are surprised that a Martin Luther King quote was not twisted into this tweet by our member of the District 3 team.

    1. She validates the thinking of some people that South Dakotans are backwoods hicks. On a side note, she is bat $–T crazy.

  9. Young Ms. Brandei seems very nice and all, but perhaps a tish inexperienced or mayhap even vacuous to be a leader in the legislatures.

  10. All of the “this blog” comments make me laugh. Did one of those unhinged idiots post in one of their circle jerk echo chamber Facebook groups to “get over there and tell ‘em” stupidity defending stupidity…I mean Brandei. Same thing.

    And for toby’s stupid podcast. I would love to see the alalyrics! Anyone can buy bot views, LOL.
    Conservatives are common sense, common sense is conservative – the far right is neither.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *