17 thoughts on “Lance Russell mailer sent out.”

    1. If it is Fitzgerald, that is hilarious.

      I see this too often. I’ve never told there is a good reason but there must be. Does anyone know why people put up pictures with half the face in sunlight and the other not? Personally, I think it a bad look and not flattering.

      1. I am not surprised, I heard that John Fitzgerald went and testified for Lance Russell at his disciplinary hearing….is that true?

  2. So, we’re all kind of already in silent agreement that Fitzgerald is going to sweep right? I mean I can’t imagine Russell or Ravnsborg giving him any trouble. Will be curious to see if Jason or Lance get more votes though.

    1. bahahahahahahahaha

      hilarious–Fitz is so far in the hole they have to pump air down to him

      Ravnsborg and Russell are both running much better campaigns

      1. I agree, Fitzgerald has all but lost this contest as he has done very little to persuade people to vote for him.

        Lets review, he barley campaigns, has not energy when he does, doesn’t not have that much support other than a few attorneys, and he has a 48% percent Conviction Rate (a failing grade). I don’t think South Dakota wants someone like that. The only supporting comments I see on this blog is from Mary, like the one above.

        This flier is amateur hour and to little to late.

    2. Uh, no, we’re not, unless you are speaking for yourself and your little clique. Ravnsborg has a lot of support, and he is not a tired retread like the other two. He is fresh, energetic, and committed.

  3. Russell knows how to campaign and is a huge threat…while Ravnsborg was not my first choice he has become my choice…Fitz is running a horrible campaign and if he keeps messing around he is going to cause this race to go to Russell and then we will lose in the general election. Like it or not Ravnsborg and Russell played the delegate game and recruited people to become active in the process, Fitz did not.

    We need some “president’s men” to talk to Fitz and tell him homemade signs in a statewide race and constant talk about his legacy and how many trials he has done is not going to win over voters. Plus how are voters even going to know of him when he can’t raise any money. He should step aside and support Ravnsborg. His being close to Russell quite frankly scares me.

    Ravnsborg and Russell are talking about ideas and vision and improving people’s lives…now you may agree or disagree with them, but they understand what office they are running for– Attorney General! and we can’t have Russell so that leaves Ravnsborg for me.

    1. I have not commented at all until just now. I use the not so secret name “Dave R”

      However, I cordially invite you to our Primary Night Watch party, it will be at McNally’s Irish pub at 7 PM. Link is on our Facebook page.

  5. In about a week, ask Ms. Krebs and Mr. Tapio how much those fancy store bought signs helped.

    1. So Dusty, Noem, and Jackley hire 1at graders to do their signs in crayon? Handmade signs don’t mean you are NOT establishment.

      1. Good point!

        All the campaigns but the Fitzgeralds don’t know what they are doing…sounds about right from what I have seen…what arrogance

  7. Go Fitz…we need an experienced AG…..Repubs are taking a gamble with these millenials who THINK they know everything….Fitz connects on personal level….TG

    1. Ok I will call you crazy if you keep posting crazy stuff like that…..

      Fitz connects on a personal level, you have to be kidding right…of the 3 Republicans running he is the LEAST personable….he comes across as gruff and he himself says so!

      The other 2 are way more well rounded for the office of Attorney General and more experienced to be AG, they are not running for States Attorney after all.

Comments are closed.