41 thoughts on “New Commercial – Randy Seiler: Too Liberal for South Dakota”

  1. great ad…i about fell out of my chair when Randy was talking about making meth into a misdemeanor!

  2. Never understood why Seiler is running as a liberal..it is who is though

    Sutton and Bjorkman are at least “trying” to run as conservatives or GOP light.

    Gun bans to bragging how he threatened to sue the governor over bathroom bill to hosting gay pride parades/ drag queen contests to now want to make ingestion of METH…meth not marijuana…outrageous

  4. Ravnsborg is supported by State’s Attorneys, Sheriffs, and the Fraternal Order of Police, Sielers has no support from law enforcement,end of story. Get out and vote for Ravnsborg, Seiler is not the guy we need for AG.

      1. That would be the National Association of Police Organizations…they support Seiler…

        Law Enforcement officers…the individuals who are working to protect you, the sheriff’s of our counties, the Chiefs and officers in our communities…they are supporting Jason Ravnsborg.

  5. Whoah! Taking common guns away from us? Pants on fire by politifact!

    We don’t want no hobby lawyers as our AG. We need a real lawyer with experience being a prosecutor in front of a jury and has managed other attorneys. Vote for Vienam vet and a real South Dakotan Randy Seiler for AG.

    1. Yes seiler wants to ban certain types of guns…heard it in interviews already myself…educate yourself

    3. Seiler is a left-wing softie on crime. Old doesn’t necessarily mean wise, and Seiler proves that.

  6. No current law enforcement supports seiler or states attorneys SPEAKS VOLUMES

    Decriminalizing meth ..unbelievable

  7. To become a lawyer you must earn a Bachelor’s degree, then get accepted to law school, then study 3 years and attain passing grades, then you must study to take the bar exam to be admitted to the practice of law. Jason has accomplished those things, AND been in practice for 17 years AND served his nation in the United States Army Reserve AND had to listen to a parade of “we like it the way it’s always been” weenies call him a “hobby” lawyer?

    Shame on you. Your “golden boy” says experience matters, well my experience listening to the anti-Jason contingent is more than enough to convince me that Jason is not only the BEST choice for the job…he is the ONLY RESPONSIBLE CHOICE for Attorney General!!

  8. South Dakota cannot afford to have 4th place Jason Roundsburg occupying the office of AG. This is bad! >>>>https://www.ksfy.com/content/news/Meth-crisis-legal-experience-drive-race-for-attorney-general-in-South-Dakota-498613661.html?fbclid=IwAR3AZ58E9iqPhJPM_gML-R-7N12lOA758roSrRf6IWaQn6a62XKXLVf3_nM

    It’s nice that Jason makes good coffee in the office, picks up mail, makes lunch runs or if the office is working late makes runs for dinner but being AG no way.

    1. Randall is not a friend of law enforcement, that should be a huge concern to everyone. Ravnsborg is a Battalion Commander, i’m pretty sure he can run an office with 38 attorneys and their support staff, give me a break. We don’t need an AG out trying cases, we need him being tough on crime and dealing with the legislature.

    3. Do YOU even have a job? Have YOU ever overseen a group of 600 military members? Didn’t think so.

    4. Any Republican on the ballot for these statewide offices is better than the ‘most’ qualified democrat. You no longer are voting for the person, but for the party of life & freedom….or destruction & deterioration of our country. Democrats are working to destroy our country. I hope South Dakotans are not ignorant to that fact in this election and many democrats are ‘getting that’ even though they want to be loyal to their parents’ party affiliation. They understand that the old democrat way of thinking is ‘gone’. Better safe than sorry…..vote REPUBLICAN all across the board.

      1. The good news is…the old Democrat way is coming back in SD. Just check out the Democrat slate of candidates. Reagan and JFK would be proud of the SD candidates. They are set apart from the rest.

        1. Tara, What are you talking about???

          No they would not…

          Someone like randy pushing for Gun control–draq queen contests and pushing the gay agenda and wanting to decriminalize meth

          I don’t remember JFK or Reagan being for any of this stuff

          1. Everyone is a product of their times. Becareful trying to make such comparisons.

            Reagan said the Democratic Party left him, while JFK left before his time. Had JFK lived a longer life my educated guess is that he would have been as liberal as Teddy.

            Because when you start using historical comparative logic, you risk justifying slavery, for instance; because on other issues, that are not contemporaneous to a given historic figure, you might assume that Jefferson would not agree, but would still be right; but how can you do that with Jefferson, for instance, while ignoring the issue of slavery and still be credible?… Fore, only genuine issues then and now deserve historic comparativeness, unless it is a mere analogy….

  9. Not to poo poo your celebration over a clever commercial, but just like the matter at the State Fair, this ad does not comport with the law. Please retool your “paid for’ section to fully disclose the PAC or person who paid for this advertisement.

  10. You Pubs our put out some really ridiculous, innacurate manure, but this was “super crappy”. If you can’t debate fairly without Tonya Harding someone, that’s really pathetic.

    1. RJ, also known as anonymous, says he shows kindness and compassion to his patients… care to share where you practice medicine?

  12. This will be over soon. Randy will not get over 40%. He is not that smart, not that nice, of poor character as a person, and not that good looking. Bad combination for running for office.

      1. Sutton and Seiler from RCJ and Argus—tells me these 2 liberal rags have no concept of what they are doing in this state…they are irrelevant and a joke.

        I’ll be voting for Kristie and Jason PROUDLY!

    2. Seiler is a crumpy old man that looks tired. He has run a horrible campaign. This race is over.

    3. Can you comprehend Randall has zero interest in stopping the meth epidemic none. He is a liberal who agreed with Obama’s releasing every single druggie scumbag prosecuted prior to his term back on the street. Politics is fine but Randall is not a prosecutor he is a bureaucrat. Nothing more.

    4. The Argus has no clue. Law enforcement supports eliminating the presumptive probation portion of SB70. So do the prosecutors. Randall and the argus are simply out of touch.

      1. Randy:

        But but I have more experience… never mind I am 30 years older than my opponent and he has ideas and I don’t and he has support with law enforcement and I do not….it’s not fair…isn’t their a newspaper I can go complain to or an ethics board…yeah that’s it they are liberals and will be sympathetic to me…

        hey I can’t sue President Trump if you don’t elect me! (o wait I wasn’t supposed to tell you that)

    5. The ONLY reason I know the Arduous Liar has endorsed Randy Seiler is because you just told me. Like most people, I do not bother reading the AL any more.

      1. Smart man DUGGERSD!

        I don’t know when these #fakenews newspapers of ours will wise up

        You pick a guy wanting to decriminalizing meth vs the guy supported by law enforcement–ABSOLUTELY UNBELIEVABLE

  15. Seiler will lose, his message does not resonate with South Dakotians. He has nothing of offer.

Comments are closed.