Noem, Peterson Lead Bipartisan Push for Year-Round E15
Washington, D.C. – Representatives Kristi Noem (R-SD) and Collin Peterson (D-MN) today led more than 20 House members in urging the EPA to approve year-round E15. The bipartisan letter to Environmental Protection Agency Acting Administrator Andrew Wheeler strongly encourages the Administration to reduce federal regulations on ethanol instead of implementing policies that only work against farmers and slow the biofuels market down.
“Our ag economy has really suffered in recent years,” said Noem. “By ending unnecessary limitations on E15, we have a big opportunity to help farmers and our ag economy, save consumers money, and reduce our reliance on foreign oil.”
Noem has been a leading ethanol advocate in Congress, consistently pushing to uphold the Renewable Fuel Standard. The Obama administration repeatedly fell short of meeting the law’s targets, and former EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt failed to make the adjustments needed in the new administration. While her work on that continues, Noem has put immense pressure on the Trump administration to lift E15 restrictions and allow its use year-round. She has met on numerous occasions with President Trump and top administration officials to advocate in support of year-round E15.
Reps. Noem and Peterson lead the bipartisan Biofuels Caucus.
LETTER TEXT:
Dear Acting Administrator Wheeler,
As representatives of our country’s strongest farming communities, we are writing to share our comments regarding the 2019 Renewable Volume Obligations (RVO) proposal under the Renewable Fuel Standards (RFS).
The RFS promotes economic development and energy security for American farmers and families. The proposed rule for the 2019 RVO demonstrates a strong commitment to ethanol production and future growth for cellulosic and advanced biofuels. Although the increase to 2.43 billion gallons in biomass-based biodiesel for 2020 is a positive step, the Environmental Protection Agency acknowledged in its proposed rule (83 Fed. Reg. § 132 July 10, 2018) that biodiesel production can reach 2.8 billion gallons in 2019 and we ask that the final rule incorporate this conclusion. But these commitments and the integrity of the RFS are undermined if the EPA continues to abuse the hardship waiver authority for small refineries.
The EPA approved 48 retroactive RFS waivers for refineries for 2016 and 2017 obligations, effectively eliminating 2.25 billion gallons in the marketplace. The 2019 RVO targets and the success of the RFS will continue to be undermined if the EPA does not account for further waivers. We urge the EPA to put an end to these secret waivers until a process is established to make the name of the refinery, the gallons waived, and other relevant information publicly available. Additionally, accounting for any 2019 waived gallons in the final rule would help ensure biofuel production is not harmed by retroactive refinery exemptions.
Instead of advancing policies that would hurt farmers and prevent market growth of ethanol, we encourage you to also consider reducing regulations, like those that prohibit the year-round sale of E15. This regulatory change would increase consumption of biofuels while also lowering RIN prices, which eases implementation of the RFS and provide consumers with another choice at the pump.
We look forward to working with you to help protect the RFS and urge you to address these issues so this important program continues to drive economic growth and investment in our rural communities.
###
Get rid of the subsidies and it’s a deal. Why is welfare different when it’s farmers getting the handout?
Electric is the future.
https://5vtj648dfk323byvjb7k1e9w-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Chevrolet-Volt-Auxiliary-Power-Load-and-Temp.png
Only if the future includes a lot of global warming. This one only runs on electric at temperatures above 25F. Great. Just what we all need.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
Electric is the future.
And they always will be …
“electric vehicles” are aka “coal fired”. Where do you think that electricity is coming from?
Unless you drive a FlexFuel E85 certified vehicle there’s a good chance anything over E10 is not recommended for your vehicle. There are many manufacturers that will deny warranty coverage if you are running anything over E10 in a non Flex Fuel vehicle. Regular fuel systems are not designed for higher levels of ethanol.
I wonder what the plan is to take care of all the warranty claims due to damage from E15. My car, my lawn mower and my motorcycle all say pretty clearly to never use anything higher than 10. The mower even has a huge warning on the filler cap that use of anything higher than 10 voids all warranties.
This is her one policy that makes me cringe.