US Senator John Thune’s Weekly Column: Men Don’t Belong in Women’s Sports

Men Don’t Belong in Women’s Sports
By Sen. John Thune 

More than 50 years ago, Congress passed landmark legislation to create equal spaces and opportunities in education for women. Title IX is particularly notable for its effect on women’s sports. By requiring that recipients of federal funding create equal athletic opportunities for women and girls, Title IX paved the way for the women’s and girls’ athletic programs that exist today at K-12 schools, colleges, and universities around the country.

But today the gains made possible by Title IX are under attack. We’ve seen biological men identifying as women take spots on teams, medals, and opportunities from women. It’s happening in a range of sports. A female runner acknowledged that first place was not within reach because she knew there would be no winning a race against a biological male who finished a full minute and 22 seconds ahead of the second-place, female finisher. A male pole vaulter won the high school women’s competition with a vault that exceeded the second-place vaulter by six inches. A high school girls’ basketball team had nearly half of its season’s points scored by a male. And that’s just a sampling of the stories.

The United Nations reported last year, “The replacement of the female sports category with a mixed-sex category has resulted in an increasing number of female athletes losing opportunities, including medals, when competing against males.” The U.N. estimated that more than 600 female athletes had lost almost 900 medals to biological men in 29 sports.

The problems here are obvious. First of all, there is the physical danger that can be posed by men participating in women’s and girls’ sports. But there’s also fairness, equality, and opportunity. Title IX was created to give women opportunities that had been denied them. But allowing biological men to compete against women means robbing female athletes of not just medals and trophies, but also scholarships, spots on a team, and opportunities to compete in front of college scouts.

This isn’t fair. Both of my daughters are former athletes, and I know how much competing in sports matters to young women and how hard they work to win. My dad was a Division I athlete who came home to Murdo and coached girls’ basketball and track. It would have been unthinkable to him that biological men could compete against the young women he coached.

I’m proud that President Trump took action to protect the original meaning of Title IX and ensure that federal funding would not go to schools that allow men to compete as women. This executive order is an important step, but executive orders can be rescinded. So the U.S. Senate recently attempted to take the next step and make this the law. Unfortunately, every single Democrat in the Senate voted to prevent us from even debating the bill.

I had a professor who used to say that some things are just intuitively obvious. This is one of those things. Generations of American women have benefited from Title IX’s promise of fair competition and equal opportunity in sports. Keeping biological men out of women’s sports is about keeping that promise alive for the next generation of female athletes.

###

Congressman Dusty Johnsonson’s Weekly Column: Shutdowns are Stupid

Shutdowns are Stupid
By Rep. Dusty Johnson
March 14, 2025

BIG Update

This week, I re-introduced my Traveler’s Gun Rights Act to protect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding RV-ers, active-duty military, military spouses, and others who rely on P.O. Boxes as their mailing address. Currently, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) does not recognize alternative addresses – like a P.O. Box – for firearms paperwork, although these types of addresses are allowable for a driver’s license.

You shouldn’t be prevented from practicing your Second Amendment rights simply because you rely on a P.O. Box. I’ll continue to lead efforts like this to ensure the right to bear arms is accessible for all law-abiding Americans.

BIG Idea

Chinese-made fentanyl has been flooding the U.S. for years. In fact, China is the number one producer of this lethal drug that makes its way across our borders.

I’ve joined my colleagues in the House and Senate to introduce legislation to combat this deadly epidemic. We are leading the Joint Task Force to Counter Illicit Synthetic Narcotics Act to stop the flow of synthetic narcotics across our borders. The bill would bring federal agencies together to disrupt trafficking networks and enforce sanctions. This includes addressing the role of the People’s Republic of China in the opioid crisis.

The Chinese Communist Party is the leading force behind America’s fentanyl crisis, and while securing the borders have made a positive impact, Congress and federal agencies must take decisive action and end the flow of drugs into our country.

BIG News

On Tuesday, I voted to pass the House Republicans’ Continuing Resolution (CR) to keep the government open through the end of the fiscal year. I know a CR is not the ideal way to fund the government, but it is a necessary path forward to keep our borders secure, ensure troops are paid, provide support for needy families, and keep government services running.

The CR also reduces federal spending compared to the prior year’s levels. America’s $37 trillion of debt will not disappear overnight, but incremental progress is important if we ever want to meaningfully tackle our debt.

This CR allows House Republicans to focus on advancing President Trump’s reconciliation goals and root out waste, fraud, and abuse to ensure your tax dollars are being used in the most effective manner.

Governor Larry Rhoden’s Weekly Column: A Historic Session – and a Path Forward

A Historic Session – and a Path Forward
By: Gov. Larry Rhoden
March 14, 2025  

We just wrapped up the 2025 legislative session – our 100th in South Dakota’s history. It’s been quite a ride. Not only did we celebrate this history of our state in this Capitol, but we also navigated a historic succession of power. I stepped into the role of governor mid-session, and that’s never happened in South Dakota history. I’m proud to say we didn’t just keep the ship afloat – we made real progress to keep South Dakota strong, safe, and free.

This session, we got things done. The first bill I signed banned sanctuary cities in South Dakota. That’s a clear statement that we support President Trump and Secretary Noem in their work to keep our communities safe from cartels and human traffickers. We also passed pro-life and pro-Second Amendment bills that reflect who we are as a state.

The House and Senate passed SB 216, my bill to address the rising burden of property taxes on homeowners. I signed it in the Capitol Rotunda to highlight the importance of this issue for our people. That’s a win for homeowners, but there’s more work to do.

We delivered South Dakota’s 136th consecutive balanced budget. That took some tough calls, including over $70 million in cuts to executive branch agencies, all proposed by the Governor’s Office. I’ve heard plenty of folks in Pierre say we need to trim spending to ease property taxes.   I’ve wrestled with property taxes and spending for years in the legislature; so I figured it’s time to break it down for you plain and simple.

Here’s the truth: the state collects $0 in property taxes – we don’t collect a penny. I told that to the leader of a South Dakota trade organization the other day, and he said – and I’m just the messenger here – “bullsh!t.” But it’s fact!

So if the state doesn’t collect property taxes, where does the money go? 56% funds our schools. Counties get 27%, cities 13%, and townships and special districts split the rest.

Then how do we cut property taxes? We’ve got three options: cut spending, shift the burden, or find new revenue. Cutting spending means slashing school budgets or county roads and public safety – there’s not the will for that. Shifting it – like we’ve seen unintentionally with rising home values – won’t fly either.

I’m taking a deeper look at option three: find new revenue to provide direct property tax relief. And when we do so, we’ll make it optional for counties. No mandates – each county will decide for themselves, either through their county commission or by a vote of the people.

This won’t be some top-down fix. It will be real tax relief for property owners, tailored to local needs. I will share this proposal with the legislature’s Property Tax Relief Task Force prior to their first meeting, and they will be able to chew on this over the summer. I’m open to more ideas, more imagination, more creative problem-solving – we need to focus on solutions, not excuses. Together, we’ll keep South Dakota the best place to live, work, and raise a family.

###

Guest Column: 340B Reform is Needed to Prevent Future Waste

340B Reform is Needed to Prevent Future Waste
By Troy Redler

For the last few weeks, the headlines have been filled with reports of outlandish government spending thanks to the efforts of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). As DOGE continues to find the worst cases of waste, fraud, and abuse across the government, it is only a matter of time before they turn their attention to the 340B program.

The 340B program was created to achieve a noble goal: to help vulnerable patients access prescription medications. This was supposed to work by allowing hospitals operating in underserved communities to purchase prescription drugs at a discounted rate. Those hospitals could then provide medicine to needy patients at a lower cost.

Unfortunately, the system was designed with a fatal flaw—there is no accountability to ensure patients actually see the savings. This has resulted in many hospitals using the 340B savings to boost their profits rather than charge patients lower prices.

This is a particularly big issue for rural states like South Dakota. Many South Dakotans live in medically underserved areas or struggle to afford their medications. Reform is desperately needed to ensure the program is serving our most vulnerable residents and prevent more resources from being wasted.

The 340B program has exploded in popularity in recent years. The number of covered entities, which is a technical term for hospitals or other healthcare providers who utilize the 340B program, has grown to over 12,700 by 2020, according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO).

The growth in the number of contract pharmacies that provide the medication paints an even starker picture. In 2010, approximately 1,800 contract pharmacy locations nationwide participated in 340B. By 2022, that number had grown to nearly 32,000.

Much of this growth has been fraudulent. Despite being a program explicitly designed to benefit vulnerable patients, only 35% of participating hospitals and clinics provide service to underserved areas. Moreover, an academic analysis found that the dramatic growth of contract pharmacies was not correlated with poverty rates or areas of medical underservice.

The GAO has found numerous instances of noncompliance across the 340B program, including ineligible facilities qualifying for discounted medications and distributing 340B drugs to ineligible patients. However, the most wasteful abuse that has been uncovered is the discovery of “duplicate discounts.” This occurs when medications that are already covered by another government benefit, such as a Medicaid rebate, are also sold under a 340b price.

While it is bad enough that taxpayer money is being wasted, what makes the situation even more concerning is that the program is failing to help the very patients it was designed to serve. Instead of lowering costs for patients, hospitals are often charging them the full sticker price for prescription medications and using the savings to invest in unrelated projects.

Defenders of the status quo sometimes argue that hospitals use their 340B savings to invest in charity care, so the program is actually achieving its stated goal. But the evidence does not support this claim. In 2022, for example, participating hospitals made over $44 billion of the 340B program but spent just under $19 billion on charity care.

Ultimately, serious changes to the program will need to be passed by Congress. Given South Dakota’s large population of underserved patients, Senate Majority Leader John Thune should make passing 340B reform a top priority.

In the short term, a good first step would be for DOGE to draw attention to the problem, as they have done for other instances of governmental abuse. After all, sunlight is the best disinfectant.

Another way DOGE can help is to advocate for a “follow the money” approach to the program. Some drugmakers have proposed moving the 340B program to a rebate model, where the manufacturers would provide the savings once a hospital verifies that the 340B drugs receiving a discount were actually purchased and dispensed by a properly eligible 340B provider.  While this system would not fix all of 340B’s woes overnight, it would be a first step towards providing the transparency necessary to ensure that at-risk patients have access to affordable medications—and that’s what matters most.

Troy Redler is the operator of the family-owned, Redler’s LTC Pharmacy specializing in pharmaceutical care for patients in long term care and senior living communities.

Thune Statement on Air Strikes in Yemen

Thune Statement on Air Strikes in Yemen

 SIOUX FALLS, S.D.  — U.S. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) today issued the following statement:

“Today’s air strikes in Yemen sent a clear and unambiguous message to our adversaries around the world: attacking the United States and our allies will not be tolerated,” said Thune“I applaud President Trump for taking this long overdue decisive action the American people deserve and expect to keep American servicemembers, maritime shipping, and our allies safe from Houthi terrorists. Bad actors around the globe must understand there are consequences for their actions, and we now have a president who’s willing to hold them accountable.” 

###

Doeden claims GOP Legislators ousted in Primary election were “corrupt.”

The most unlikeable man in South Dakota, Toby Doeden, is shooting off his mouth again.

This time, on his revamped website, he’s making a completely unsubstantiated claim that the Republican legislators ousted in the 2024 Primary election were somehow corrupt:

In 2024, he launched Dakota First Action, a political action committee that helped conservative outsiders win many elections across the state, ousting a dozen corrupt career politicians along the way.”

The guy who funded his PAC with an illegal donation (which he later claimed was a loan), is trying to say that people like Senator Jean Hunhoff, former Mayor of Yankton & one of South Dakota’s longest serving legislators or Rep. Bryon Callies, a National Vice Commander of the American Legion were somehow corrupt?

What a complete d-bag.

Rounds Leads Legislation to Extend Reporting Deadline for Emergency Tribal Care

Rounds Leads Legislation to Extend Reporting Deadline for Emergency Tribal Care 

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) and Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), members of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, today reintroduced legislation to extend the reporting deadline for Indian Health Service (IHS) patients who seek emergency care outside of IHS facilities. The IHS Emergency Claims Parity Act would extend the emergency notification requirements of IHS’s Purchased and Referred Care (PRC) program from within 72 hours to 15 days.

“Nobody in an emergency situation should have to have the bureaucratic paperwork process of the IHS at the top of their mind,” said Rounds. “In an emergency, patients need to be able to seek care at the closest facility that can adequately address their needs without worrying that the IHS won’t reimburse costs. Asking them to report this care within 72 hours after a medical emergency is unrealistic and has contributed to significant medical debt in tribal communities. Currently, IHS offers one of the shortest windows to submit emergency claims out of any government-run health care system. This legislation would fix that.”

“Medical emergencies are emergencies – people can’t choose when and where they occur,” said Cortez Masto. “In a crisis, IHS patients should be able to seek care at the closest hospital without worrying about having to fill out burdensome paperwork after an emergency.”

“We thank Senator Rounds for his leadership to help improve Indian health care,” said Gay Kingman, Executive Director of the Great Plains Tribal Chairmen’s Association. “As he knows, many of our IHS patients have limited means and a clear avenue to secure assistance is critical to the provision of good health care and to improve health outcomes. These are life and death matters.”

“The last thing a medical patient should have to worry about is paperwork during a healthcare emergency,” said Frank Star Comes Out, President of Oglala Sioux Tribe. “The Indian Health Service’s current 72-hour emergency PRC reporting window places an undue burden on tribal members. We thank Senator Rounds for consulting with tribal leaders on this issue and working to find potential solutions. The restrictive rules of the PRC program need to be addressed. We look forward to working with the Senator to ensure existing flexibilities are included in the bill and get it across the finish line.”

“Tribal members are already subject to a number of strict rules when accessing Purchased and Referred Care resources,” said Wayne Boyd, Treasurer of the Rosebud Sioux Tribe. “It is unrealistic for IHS to expect patients to report PRC claims when dealing with life threatening injuries or illness. I thank Senator Rounds for working with tribal leaders and taking a common-sense approach to address this issue.”

 IHS beneficiaries are subject to a number of restrictive rules when seeking outside care; however, few of these rules are as problematic as the emergency reporting deadline. Currently, in emergency cases, the patient must notify the PRC office within 72 hours of receiving outside care. Native American patients determined to be elderly or disabled are given 30 days to notify the IHS of emergency medical care received from non-IHS medical providers or at non-IHS medical facilities.

The IHS Emergency Claims Parity Act would increase the window for timely consideration of emergency care payments to 15 days for all IHS beneficiaries. This excludes reporting requirements for patients considered to be elderly or disabled, which will stay at 30 days.

Click HERE for full bill text.

###

March 2025 SDGOP FEC Report: $32 raised, $8359 spent, $49,250 cash on hand.

The March 2025 FEC Report for the South Dakota Republican Party has been filed.  While the new leadership group has not STILL filed anything indicating that they’re in charge, despite FEC Requirements, the old group is closing out their books.

And as members of past SDGOP Leadership have been warning for months, the SDGOP’s toxicity, and county parties not helping has not been good to their bottom line.

March 2025 SDGOP FEC Report by Pat Powers on Scribd

The SDGOP raised a whole $32.00 in the period between 2/1 – 2/28/2025.  That’s $32 as in dollars, not $32,000. They did also get back $53.68 in bank fees/interest, which helped to double their fundraising for the month. This comes against $8358.88 in expenditures, leaving the SDGOP $49,250.01 for the new group to play with.

The new crew did manage to get the SDGOP website under their control.  But, as noted, they can’t seem to get their filings done, as neither the FEC nor the SDSOS have updated contact information.

 

McPherson State’s Attorney Austin Hoffman appears to have been appointed to Board of Elections

I saw an item from the kooky canvassers (a.k.a., the election goofballs) on facebook where for the last day they have been going absolutely apoplectic because it appears that McPherson County State’s Attorney, and son of former Republican State Rep. Charlie Hoffman, has been appointed to the State Board of Elections. While not on the SOS website yet, according to the State’s Board and Commissions website:

This was an excellent appointment, as Hoffman has experience with some of the battles that have taken place over the last year where the election hand-counting kooks have pressed to dump election machines, such as in this story from the Dakota Scout:

Hand-counting all of the June 4 primary ballots in McPherson County proved the process is a waste of time and money.

That was the take of McPherson County State’s Attorney Austin Hoffman after a secondary audit of ballots on Tuesday.

and..

The hand-counting resulted in four missed ballots (eight missed tallies) in the District 23 House Republican primary, Hoffman said.

“In my view, that’s not acceptable for an actual election,” he said.

Hoffman said concerns about vote tabulators have “no merit whatsoever.”

Read that here.

To say the election kooks hate him, might be an understatement, as evidenced from Rick Weible using “Pillow-guy Internet TV” to specifically call out Hoffman in the middle of a rant where he attacks then Governor Kristi Noem back in March of 2024:

“So I want to warn the rest of the country, you’d better be careful who your VP pick is going to be. I’m calling it out right now. And then also Representative Darreld(?), shame on you, Representative Rehfeldt, shame on you. Representative Reimer, the prime sponsor of this? You are disgusting. I want to make sure and call out every one of those, that they need to be primaried, immediately.”

and..

“And these two attorney’s – Sara Frankenstein, how dare you represent the laws..in South Dakota.. and not be there for the people? And then a special.. special one.. Austin Hoffman, how dare you go to your county commissioners and sit there and quote statutes that are actually repealed and try to use that as an excuse to dee-reel.. derail the petition process in your county and the decisions making of your county. I would implore those county commissioners to start an investigation to find out what other lies that he’s told them.”

Read that here.

And don’t think Austin sits there and just takes it – because he’s not afraid to point out facts, and call them out for their BS:

Over the last several years, Mr. Klipfel and other members of the Executive Board have used those positions to push personal agendas. They have used the McPherson County Republican Executive Board as a vehicle to move forward an anti-CO2 pipeline agenda, an unfounded election integrity agenda, and most recently to push a blatantly false and incorrect narrative that myself, as State’s Attorney, am attempting to push a resolution that would violate First Amendment freedom of speech rights. The first two items I mention are inappropriate. The latter is absurd.

and..

“I have no issues with someone disagreeing with me politically or unhappy with the decisions I make as McPherson County State’s Attorney. Everyone has the right to their opinion. But using one’s role as Chairman of the McPherson County Republicans to make incorrect and false accusations, to push personal agendas, or to complain about legal bills they created, is an entirely different story.”

(You can read that here.)

In other words, he’s not afraid to face off with these election nonsense goofs, using logic and the law. So they don’t care for that.

Of course, they had some choice comments about his new position:

Not thinking that’s how that works..  Oh, here’s a great one:

Uh oh!  “File a complaint with Marty Jackley.”  I hate to tell this gal that Marty is well aware of Austin. And knows just what to do with him:

Attorney general announces first Open Meetings Commission hearing in nearly four years
(From SD Searchlight)

The current five-member panel consists of State’s Attorneys Austin Hoffman of McPherson County, Katelynn Hoffman of Turner County, Lance Russell of Fall River/Oglala Lakota County, Michael Smith of Clay County, and Emily Sovell of Sully County.

He appoints him to boards and commissions as well!   We’ll see how far they get with that one.

So, Congratulations appear to be in order to Austin for his apparent appointment!

(And apologies to him on behalf of not-crazy South Dakotans in advance for what he’s going to have to listen to on the Board of Elections.)