Fox calls SD for Thune
Fox News just called South Dakota for Thune. 15 minutes before any results are released.
They must have been following the race!
Fox News just called South Dakota for Thune. 15 minutes before any results are released.
They must have been following the race!
From the Hill:
Republicans are projected to keep their majority in the House, as expected.
ABC News and NBC News both made the projection after 8:30 p.m.
Only a handful of competitive seats had been determined when the projections were made, but Democrats faced tall odds at winning back the House given the GOP’s 30-seat majority.
And..
Democrats further struggled with candidate recruitment in many competitive districts that offered pickup opportunities in a presidential year, when voter turnout is higher.
As I’m waiting around fo polls to close, several politicos are talking about the issues with the ballot measures – and how many legislators in going door to door are hearing that there are too many of these out of state driven measures on the ballot – and it’s time that they do something about it.
People are talking about adjustments ranging from restrictions on out of state cash being infused into the races, to adjusting the vote threshold for Constitutional amendments.
The one point stressed is that whatever is to be done, it has to be an open, palms up process that meets with voter approval. South Dakota has a strong tradition with the process of referral and initiatives, and whatever form reform takes, it has to recognize that, and prevent it’s abuse.
I’m on location at the District in Sioux Falls, with “SDWC Election Central” up and operating.
Polls have now closed in Eastern South Dakota, with another hour and fifteen minutes until results will be released.
An Hour and fifteen minutes, you may ask? From the Secretary of State:
Election Results Cannot Be Released until 8:15pm Central Time
Pierre, SD – Secretary of State Shantel Krebs stated, “Julie Pearson, Pennington County Auditor called the Secretary of State’s office and reported to us that there was a fire incident at one of the polling locations (a school) in Pennington County. Voting was delayed for 15 minutes while voters and election workers went outside.”
The election workers took the ballot box containing all marked ballots along with the Voter Registration list with them as they exited the polling location.
Due to the fifteen minute delay caused by the fire incident the precinct will need to remain open an additional fifteen minutes. Closing at 7:15pm Mountain Time.
Election results will not be able to be displayed on the Secretary of State’s website or released by County Auditors until 8:15 pm Central Time as state law requires. Live results will be displayed at 8:30pm Central Time.
SDCL 12-20-17. Returns not disclosed until all polls in state closed. No public disclosure of the returns of state and federal elections in any primary or general election is permitted until each precinct-polling place in the state is closed. This provision applies to each precinct-polling place within the state.
#30#
So, just hang tight.
I’m getting prepped to head down to Sioux Falls for the GOP Victory party at the District. I’ll have all my equipment in tow, so stay tuned for coverage of tonight’s election!
This year’s long lines at the ballot box are a result of a couple of things. First, a very contentious presidential election driving participation numbers up. Secondly, what some of us might consider “the ballot from hell” with one of the longest lists of ballot measures in recent history.
So, where do I think these measures are going to land? I think the position of measures on the ballot will have something to do with it, as well as a propensity of people to vote NO when faced with overly long explanations and confusion. And there’s also a mix of how much advertising the measures have done.
Ballot Question |
Yes |
No |
AMENDMENT R: AN AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTITUTION REGARDING POSTSECONDARY TECHNICAL |
59% |
41% |
AMENDMENT S: AN INITIATED AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTITUTION TO EXPAND RIGHTS FOR CRIME VICTIMS |
52% |
48% |
AMENDMENT T: AN INITIATED AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTITUTION TO PROVIDE FOR STATE LEGISLATIVE REDISTRICTING BY A COMMISSION |
57% |
43% |
AMENDMENT U: AN INITIATED AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTITUTION LIMITING THE ABILITY TO SET STATUTORY INTEREST RATES FOR LOANS |
42% |
58% |
AMENDMENT V: AN INITIATED AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTITUTION ESTABLISHING NONPARTISAN ELECTIONS |
48% |
52% |
INITIATED MEASURE 21: AN INITIATED MEASURE TO SET A MAXIMUM FINANCE CHARGE FOR CERTAIN LICENSED |
Toss Up |
Toss Up |
INITIATED MEASURE 22: AN INITIATED MEASURE TO REVISE STATE CAMPAIGN FINANCE AND LOBBYING LAWS, CREATE A PUBLICLY FUNDED CAMPAIGN FINANCE PROGRAM, CREATE AN ETHICS COMMISSION, AND APPROPRIATE FUNDS |
42% |
58% |
INITIATED MEASURE 23: AN INITIATED MEASURE TO GIVE CERTAIN ORGANIZATIONS THE RIGHT TO CHARGE FEES |
35% |
65% |
REFERRED LAW 19: AN ACT TO REVISE STATE LAWS REGARDING ELECTIONS AND ELECTION PETITIONS |
38% |
62% |
REFERRED LAW 20: AN ACT LOWERING THE STATE MINIMUM WAGE FOR NON-TIPPED EMPLOYEES UNDER AGE 18 |
35% |
65% |
In looking at it, I’m betting on the top three measures on the ballot to pass for a few different reasons.
Amendment R has had no real opposition of any sort, aside from a cursory notation against it in the ballot measure brochure. It has also had some advertising in favor of it, and there’s really no controversy attached to it.
Amendment S, a.k.a. Marsy’s Law, will be tighter, due to the opposition of many State’s Attorneys. However, as a concept, most are in favor of victim’s rights. And there’s the Kelsey Grammer ad. Arguably the single best and most recognizable ad of the entire election season. It’s a powerful argument, they’re towards the top of the ballot, and I think they’ll pull it off.
Amendment T. The GOP had to pick their battles, and ultimately, many adopted the same attitude I had – who cares? It’s not going to amount to a hill of beans, and the GOP will still be dominant. Although rejiggering districts in the short term will be a pain, there are bigger fish to fry.
The rest are more likely to end up in the loss column.
Amendment U was put on the ballot, but not effectively supported with advertising by the ballot measure sponsors. However, what it is doing is causing voter confusion between the two measures. I look to this one to go down, possibly by a substantial margin.
Amendment V has had a LOT of out of state money spent on it’s behalf. But I think the second of Slick Rick Weiland’s measures (after Amendment T being the first) will go down. Hiding party label is not a popular concept in red state South Dakota, and word is they haven’t been chasing after the issue west river very hard. If it’s even east river, as the votes move West River, the voters should come in and effectively kill it.
Initiated Measure 21 is my lone toss up. Midway among the ballot measures, only those concerned about it will be casting a “yea” vote, and I don’t know that the yes side effectively made their case before the floodgates of advertising opened up against it. With ads on either side saying No on U, Yes on 21, as well as Yes on U, No on 21, I think voters might be apt to just kill them both.
Even before the advertising started in earnest, polling such as Nielson Brothers were showing only 39% for, and 26% against, with 35% undecided. Once the No on Initiated Measure 21 groups got moving, I suspect numbers started moving against it in such a way that there’s no clear indication how the vote is going to go tonight. Whatever it is, I think it’s going to be close.
Initiated Measure 22, the bill to handout taxpayer dollars to politicians has had a lot of money thrown at it from either side. But both being down ballot, having state leaders against it, and bearing the title of “CREATE A PUBLICLY FUNDED CAMPAIGN FINANCE PROGRAM” as part of the measure, I think it’s toast.
Despite it’s cute advertising, Initiated Measure 23 is going to go down hard. You can take take that to the bank.
And RL 19 and 20 are going to go down, because people have lost interest at this point, and neither have had good reasons noted to vote for them.
Agree? Disagree? The floor is yours.
Jeez… the more I look at it, the more I think the election in South Dakota is going to be an electoral disaster for Democrats.
District |
Race |
Name |
Party |
Predictions |
Notes |
District 01 |
State Representative |
Steven D. McCleerey |
DEM |
Dem Over |
|
District 01 |
State Representative |
Susan Wismer |
DEM |
Dem Over |
|
District 02 |
State Representative |
John Graham |
DEM |
|
Graham against 2 |
District 02 |
State Representative |
Lana Greenfield |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 02 |
State Representative |
Burt Tulson |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 03 |
State Representative |
Nikki Bootz |
DEM |
|
This was never a race. |
District 03 |
State Representative |
Brooks Briscoe |
DEM |
|
|
District 03 |
State Representative |
Drew Dennert |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 03 |
State Representative |
Daniel Kaiser |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 04 |
State Representative |
Matt Rosdahl |
DEM |
|
Democrats didn’t run a race. At all. |
District 04 |
State Representative |
Peggy Schuelke |
DEM |
|
|
District 04 |
State Representative |
John Mills |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 04 |
State Representative |
Jason W. Kettwig |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 05 |
State Representative |
Michele Alvine |
DEM |
|
|
District 05 |
State Representative |
Charles “Chuck” |
IND |
|
|
District 05 |
State Representative |
Hugh M. Bartels |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 05 |
State Representative |
Nancy York |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 06 |
State Representative |
Clara Hart |
DEM |
|
Latterell and Otten will win. This is not a contest. Hart was loaded with cash, but I don’t know if it was evident. |
District 06 |
State Representative |
Kyle Rogers |
DEM |
|
|
District 06 |
State Representative |
Isaac Latterell |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 06 |
State Representative |
Herman Otten |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 07 |
State Representative |
Linda A. Brandt |
DEM |
|
Reed will win, and Hawley |
District 07 |
State Representative |
Spencer Hawley |
DEM |
Dem |
|
District 07 |
State Representative |
Tim Reed |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 08 |
State Representative |
Kory Rawstern |
DEM |
|
Word is Unger is running stronger than expected, but I expect Heinemann as incumbent to be safe. |
District 08 |
State Representative |
Jason Unger |
DEM |
|
|
District 08 |
State Representative |
Leslie Heinemann |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 08 |
State Representative |
Mathew Wollmann |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 09 |
State Representative |
Mark G. Guthmiller |
DEM |
|
This is a toss-up district. Saba spent money, but Clark is well thought of. |
District 09 |
State Representative |
Michael Saba |
DEM |
Toss up |
|
District 09 |
State Representative |
Michael Clark |
REP |
Toss up |
|
District 09 |
State Representative |
Wayne H. Steinhauer |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 10 |
State Representative |
Dean Kurtz |
DEM |
|
This District will remain |
District 10 |
State Representative |
Paul Vanderlinde |
DEM |
|
|
District 10 |
State Representative |
Don Haggar |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 10 |
State Representative |
Steven Haugaard |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 11 |
State Representative |
Leona Weiland |
DEM |
|
|
District 11 |
State Representative |
Paul Schipper |
DEM |
|
|
District 11 |
State Representative |
Chris Karr |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 11 |
State Representative |
Mark K Willadsen |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 12 |
State Representative |
Bob Benson |
DEM |
|
|
District 12 |
State Representative |
Susan Randall |
DEM |
|
|
District 12 |
State Representative |
Arch Beal |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 12 |
State Representative |
Greg Jamison |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 13 |
State Representative |
P. James Eckhoff Jr |
DEM |
|
. |
District 13 |
State Representative |
Ellee Spawn |
DEM |
|
|
District 13 |
State Representative |
G. Mark Mickelson |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 13 |
State Representative |
Sue Lucas-Peterson |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 14 |
State Representative |
Valerie Loudenback |
DEM |
|
LaPlante was a good substitution, but Holmes & Zikmund are good campaigners. Advantage GOP. |
District 14 |
State Representative |
Michael LaPlante |
DEM |
|
|
District 14 |
State Representative |
Tom Holmes |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 14 |
State Representative |
Larry P. Zikmund |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 15 |
State Representative |
Jamie Smith |
DEM |
Leggett has had a go around before, and ready to go this year. Myers apparently moved to Minn. |
|
District 15 |
State Representative |
Karen Soli |
DEM |
Dem |
|
District 15 |
State Representative |
Eric Leggett |
IND |
Indy |
|
District 15 |
State Representative |
Mike Myers |
IND |
|
|
District 16 |
State Representative |
Ted Curry |
DEM |
|
I don’t have a good enough read, but my people down there indicate Tornberg hasn’t run half the race she did last time. |
District 16 |
State Representative |
Ann Tornberg |
DEM |
|
|
District 16 |
State Representative |
Kevin D. Jensen |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 16 |
State Representative |
David L. Anderson |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 17 |
State Representative |
Ray Ring |
DEM |
Dem |
The incumbents will be |
District 17 |
State Representative |
Mark Winegar |
DEM |
|
|
District 17 |
State Representative |
Debbie Pease |
REP |
|
|
District 17 |
State Representative |
Nancy Rasmussen |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 18 |
State Representative |
David Allen |
DEM |
|
Hunhoff & Stevens will dominate the race. |
District 18 |
State Representative |
Peter Rossiter |
DEM |
|
|
District 18 |
State Representative |
Jean M. Hunhoff |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 18 |
State Representative |
Mike Stevens |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 19 |
State Representative |
Melissa Mentele |
DEM |
|
|
District 19 |
State Representative |
Kent S. Peterson |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 19 |
State Representative |
Kyle Schoenfish |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 20 |
State Representative |
Lance Carson |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 20 |
State Representative |
Tona Rozum |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 21 |
State Representative |
Juile Bartling |
DEM |
Strong Dem |
Another one for each |
District 21 |
State Representative |
Gary Burrus |
DEM |
|
|
District 21 |
State Representative |
Lee Qualm |
REP |
Strong GOP |
|
District 22 |
State Representative |
Carmen Dannenbring |
DEM |
||
District 22 |
State Representative |
Joan Wollschlager |
DEM |
||
District 22 |
State Representative |
Roger Chase |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 22 |
State Representative |
Bob Glanzer |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 23 |
State Representative |
John A. Lake |
REP |
GOP Over |
|
District 23 |
State Representative |
Spencer Gosch |
REP |
GOP Over |
|
District 24 |
State Representative |
Mary Duvall |
REP |
GOP Over |
|
District 24 |
State Representative |
Tim Rounds |
REP |
GOP Over |
|
District 25 |
State Representative |
David Haagenson |
DEM |
|
I want Pischke to win, because he’s a good guy, and a good candidate. But you can’t always get what you want. |
District 25 |
State Representative |
Dan Ahlers |
DEM |
Toss Up |
|
District 25 |
State Representative |
Roger Hunt |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 25 |
State Representative |
Tom Pischke |
REP |
Toss Up |
|
District 26A |
State Representative |
Shawn Bordeaux |
DEM |
Dem Over |
|
District 26B |
State Representative |
James Schaefer |
REP |
GOP Over |
|
District 27 |
State Representative |
Jim Bradford |
DEM |
Dem |
This is tough territory for the GOP, and conventional wisdom is that Liz May’s luck may have run out. |
District 27 |
State Representative |
Red Dawn Foster |
DEM |
Toss Up |
|
District 27 |
State Representative |
Steve Livermont |
REP |
|
|
District 27 |
State Representative |
Elizabeth May |
REP |
Toss Up |
|
District 28A |
State Representative |
Oren Lesmeister |
DEM |
Dem Over |
|
District 28B |
State Representative |
Sam Marty |
REP |
GOP Over |
|
District 29 |
State Representative |
Thomas J. Brunner |
REP |
GOP Over |
|
District 29 |
State Representative |
Larry Rhoden |
REP |
GOP Over |
|
District 30 |
State Representative |
Sandy Arseneault |
DEM |
|
Dems are not elected in |
District 30 |
State Representative |
Kristine Ina Winter |
DEM |
|
|
District 30 |
State Representative |
Julie Frye-Mueller |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 30 |
State Representative |
Tim R. Goodwin |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 31 |
State Representative |
Timothy R. Johns |
REP |
GOP Over |
|
District 31 |
State Representative |
Charles M. Turbiville |
REP |
GOP Over |
|
District 32 |
State Representative |
Nik Aberle |
DEM |
|
This race is over. |
District 32 |
State Representative |
Susan Kelts |
DEM |
|
|
District 32 |
State Representative |
Sean McPherson |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 32 |
State Representative |
Kristin A. Conzet |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 33 |
State Representative |
Jim Hadd |
DEM |
|
This race is over. |
District 33 |
State Representative |
Ethan Marsland |
DEM |
|
|
District 33 |
State Representative |
Taffy Howard |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 33 |
State Representative |
David Johnson |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 34 |
State Representative |
Steve Stenson |
DEM |
|
This race is over. |
District 34 |
State Representative |
Dan Dryden/Dave Lust |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 34 |
State Representative |
Craig Tieszen |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 35 |
State Representative |
Dave Freytag |
DEM |
|
This race is over. |
District 35 |
State Representative |
Michael T Hanson |
DEM |
|
|
District 35 |
State Representative |
Blaine “Chip” |
REP |
GOP |
|
District 35 |
State Representative |
Lynne DiSanto |
REP |
GOP |
I don’t see any good news in the card for Democrats, as Republicans continue to maintain what would normally be impossibly high numbers of legislators.
After going through the past 2 legislative sessions with a count of 58 Republicans to 12 Democrats, in taking the thousand foot view of this years’ house races, I’m coming up with a count of 57 Republican Seats, 9 Democrats, 3 toss ups, and 1 Independent (Kudos to Eric Leggett, whom I hear has really gone after it this year).
If we give all the toss-up races to Democrats… that would leave them at 12, with Republicans losing 1 seat to an independent who would probably vote with them on most issues anyway.
Even if the GOP loses one or two that I’m counting in our column at the moment, there’s not a lot for Democrats to cheer about. They’ve taken their dismal number of legislators, and managed to maintain it.
Has the media called the election for Thune and Noem yet? What’s the hold up?
🙂
Marsy’s Law To Hold Election Night Party In Sioux Falls
(Pierre, SD)—The Marsy’s Law for South Dakota campaign is holding an election night party in Sioux Falls on Tuesday, November 8. The event will be held in the Revir Ballroom at the Downtown Hilton Garden Inn located at 201 E. 8th St, Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The public is invited. The event will start at 7:00pm and last until 11:00pm.
Representatives from the Marsy’s Law campaign, including prosecutors, victims and victim advocates will be available for press interviews.
Representatives will also be available for phone interviews at 605-280-7767.
“We are humbled by the outpouring of support we have received across the state,” said Jason Glodt, former Assistant Attorney General and State Director for Marsy’s Law for South Dakota. “Volunteers have been working tirelessly across the state for months asking people to give equal rights to crime victims. On Election Day, we have the opportunity to make history for victim rights in South Dakota!”
###
As of Friday, almost 40 million Americans have already voted and there will be roughly 80 million votes cast tomorrow. In other words, the election will very soon be over except for counting the ballots. Within 48 hours, this thread will become moot.
According to realclearpolitics.com, average of all polls, Hillary leads Trump by roughly 3% with roughly 7% who are undecided. This translates into a Hillary Clinton lead in the Electoral College Votes 301 to 237. 270 Electoral Votes needed to win. 269 Electoral Votes is a tie.
In other words, for Trump to win, he has to win states which total 33 electoral votes currently in the Clinton column (actually 32 as it would be likely the House would elect Trump if there is a tie).
Going into the election right now, Clinton has in the bank 203 Electoral Votes vs. 164 for Trump (“in the bank” is shorthand for leading in the polls by more than 5%).
The following is my cheat sheet. If a “Likely Winner” loses a state I’ve allocated to them, they must pick it up somewhere else.
State | Polls Close (CST) | Electoral Votes | Likely Winner | Electoral College Votes | Comments |
Maine CD #2 | 5:00 p.m. | 1 | DJT | 203-165 | DJT losing here could foreshadow NH |
Maine Statewide | 5:00 p.m. | 2 | HRC | 205-165 | HRC losing here could foreshadow NH |
Virginia | 6:00 p.m. | 13 | HRC | 218-165 | Sen. Kaine on ticket makes this likely HRC |
Georgia | 6:00 p.m. | 16 | DJT | 218-181 | DJT losing here foreshadows NC |
Ohio | 6:30 p.m. | 18 | DJT | 218-199 | Trump been holding lead for weeks |
North Carolina | 6:30 p.m. | 15 | Virtually tied | ||
Florida | 7:00 p.m. | 29 | Virtually tied | ||
New Hampshire | 7:00 p.m. | 4 | Virtually tied | ||
Pennsylvania | 7:00 p.m. | 20 | HRC | 238-199 | If Trump wins, he will win the election |
Michigan | 7:00 p.m. | 16 | HRC | 254-199 | If Trump wins, he will win the election |
Iowa | 7:30 p.m. | 6 | DJT | 254-205 | Trump been holding lead for weeks |
Colorado | 8:00 p.m. | 9 | HRC | 263-205 | Trump needs Independent candidates to do well |
New Mexico | 8:00 p.m. | 5 | HRC | 268-205 | Unpredictable with NM former Gov. on ballot |
Arizona | 8:00 p.m. | 11 | DJT | 268-216 | Trump loss foreshadows Nevada and NM |
Nevada | 9:00 p.m. | 6 | 268-216 | Virtually tied |
There are some very interesting linkages because of similarities of the respective states.
As you can see, Trump has to hold ALL STATES he leads by 3% or more and run the table on the states that are virtually tied (Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, and Nevada). If he runs the table but loses just Maine CD#1, we have a tied Electoral College and the House will select the next President of the United States.
The good news is Trump doesn’t have to win a state he is currently behind by more than 3% to win the election. The bad news is he has to win all the four closest states (FL, NC, NH, & NV). In short, odds of Trump winning are the same as flipping a coin twice and both landing on heads.
The American body politic is deeply divided with roughly 45% on the liberal side and 45% on the conservative side. There is about 5% which lean each way. It is my opinion that this election will be decided by the very middle 5% of the American body politic. These people usually confound the pollsters as they move generally in block on Election Day which explains Obama beating polls in 2008 and 2012 and Bush in 2004 or Reagan in 1980.
My gut: Watch Maine CD#2 & Maine Statewide. If both go one way, I think it will foreshadow the winner. That said, all of America is watching to see what happens in Florida. Been there and done that for the last four elections. Might as well keep it up.
P.S. Sorry about the format. Did the best I could in the time I had. Not the graphics wiz Pat is.