The Hill – GOP Keeps US House

From the Hill: 

Republicans are projected to keep their majority in the House, as expected.

ABC News and NBC News both made the projection after 8:30 p.m.

Only a handful of competitive seats had been determined when the projections were made, but Democrats faced tall odds at winning back the House given the GOP’s 30-seat majority.

And..

Democrats further struggled with candidate recruitment in many competitive districts that offered pickup opportunities in a presidential year, when voter turnout is higher.

Read it all here.

Notes from Election Central – “Time to do something about these ballot measures.”

As I’m waiting around fo polls to close, several politicos are talking about the issues with the ballot measures – and how many legislators in going door to door are hearing that there are too many of these out of state driven measures on the ballot – and it’s time that they do something about it.

People are talking about adjustments ranging from restrictions on out of state cash being infused into the races, to adjusting the vote threshold for Constitutional amendments.  

The one point stressed is that whatever is to be done, it has to be an open, palms up process that meets with voter approval. South Dakota has a strong tradition with the process of referral and initiatives, and whatever form reform takes, it has to recognize that, and prevent it’s abuse.

Ready to go at “SDWC Election Central,” on location at the District in Sioux Falls.

I’m on location at the District in Sioux Falls, with “SDWC Election Central” up and operating.


Polls have now closed in Eastern South Dakota, with another hour and fifteen minutes until results will be released. 

An Hour and fifteen minutes, you may ask? From the Secretary of State: 

Election Results Cannot Be Released until 8:15pm Central Time

Pierre, SD – Secretary of State Shantel Krebs stated, “Julie Pearson, Pennington County Auditor called the Secretary of State’s office and reported to us that there was a fire incident at one of the polling locations (a school) in Pennington County. Voting was delayed for 15 minutes while voters and election workers went outside.” 

The election workers took the ballot box containing all marked ballots along with the Voter Registration list with them as they exited the polling location.

Due to the fifteen minute delay caused by the fire incident the precinct will need to remain open an additional fifteen minutes. Closing at 7:15pm Mountain Time.  

Election results will not be able to be displayed on the Secretary of State’s website or released by County Auditors until 8:15 pm Central Time as state law requires. Live results will be displayed at 8:30pm Central Time.

SDCL 12-20-17. Returns not disclosed until all polls in state closed. No public disclosure of the returns of state and federal elections in any primary or general election is permitted until each precinct-polling place in the state is closed. This provision applies to each precinct-polling place within the state.

                                                                                                            #30#

So, just hang tight.

Ballot Measure thoughts & predictions.

This year’s long lines at the ballot box are a result of a couple of things. First, a very contentious presidential election driving participation numbers up. Secondly, what some of us might consider “the ballot from hell” with one of the longest lists of ballot measures in recent history.

So, where do I think these measures are going to land? I think the position of measures on the ballot will have something to do with it, as well as a propensity of people to vote NO when faced with overly long explanations and confusion. And there’s also a mix of how much advertising the measures have done.

Ballot Question

Yes

No

AMENDMENT R: AN AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTITUTION REGARDING POSTSECONDARY TECHNICAL
EDUCATION INSTITUTES.

 59%

41%

AMENDMENT S: AN INITIATED AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTITUTION TO EXPAND RIGHTS FOR CRIME VICTIMS 

 52%

48%

AMENDMENT T: AN INITIATED AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTITUTION TO PROVIDE FOR STATE LEGISLATIVE REDISTRICTING BY A COMMISSION

 57%

43%

AMENDMENT U: AN INITIATED AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTITUTION LIMITING THE ABILITY TO SET STATUTORY INTEREST RATES FOR LOANS

 42%

58%

AMENDMENT V: AN INITIATED AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTITUTION ESTABLISHING NONPARTISAN ELECTIONS

48%

52%

INITIATED MEASURE 21: AN INITIATED MEASURE TO SET A MAXIMUM FINANCE CHARGE FOR CERTAIN LICENSED
MONEY LENDERS

Toss Up

Toss Up

INITIATED MEASURE 22: AN INITIATED MEASURE TO REVISE STATE CAMPAIGN FINANCE AND LOBBYING LAWS, CREATE A PUBLICLY FUNDED CAMPAIGN FINANCE PROGRAM, CREATE AN ETHICS COMMISSION, AND APPROPRIATE FUNDS

42%

58%

INITIATED MEASURE 23: AN INITIATED MEASURE TO GIVE CERTAIN ORGANIZATIONS THE RIGHT TO CHARGE FEES

 35%

65%

REFERRED LAW 19: AN ACT TO REVISE STATE LAWS REGARDING ELECTIONS AND ELECTION PETITIONS

38%

62%

REFERRED LAW 20: AN ACT LOWERING THE STATE MINIMUM WAGE FOR NON-TIPPED EMPLOYEES UNDER AGE 18

35%

65%

In looking at it, I’m betting on the top three measures on the ballot to pass for a few different reasons.

Amendment R has had no real opposition of any sort, aside from a cursory notation against it in the ballot measure brochure. It has also had some advertising in favor of it, and there’s really no controversy attached to it.

Amendment S, a.k.a. Marsy’s Law, will be tighter, due to the opposition of many State’s Attorneys. However, as a concept, most are in favor of victim’s rights. And there’s the Kelsey Grammer ad. Arguably the single best and most recognizable ad of the entire election season. It’s a powerful argument, they’re towards the top of the ballot, and I think they’ll pull it off.

Amendment T. The GOP had to pick their battles, and ultimately, many adopted the same attitude I had – who cares? It’s not going to amount to a hill of beans, and the GOP will still be dominant. Although rejiggering districts in the short term will be a pain, there are bigger fish to fry.

The rest are more likely to end up in the loss column.

Amendment U was put on the ballot, but not effectively supported with advertising by the ballot measure sponsors. However, what it is doing is causing voter confusion between the two measures.  I look to this one to go down, possibly by a substantial margin.

Amendment V has had a LOT of out of state money spent on it’s behalf. But I think the second of Slick Rick Weiland’s measures (after Amendment T being the first) will go down. Hiding party label is not a popular concept in red state South Dakota, and word is they haven’t been chasing after the issue west river very hard. If it’s even east river, as the votes move West River, the voters should come in and effectively kill it.

Initiated Measure 21 is my lone toss up.  Midway among the ballot measures, only those concerned about it will be casting a “yea” vote, and I don’t know that the yes side effectively made their case before the floodgates of advertising opened up against it. With ads on either side saying No on U, Yes on 21, as well as Yes on U, No on 21, I think voters might be apt to just kill them both.

Even before the advertising started in earnest, polling such as Nielson Brothers were showing only 39% for, and 26% against, with 35% undecided. Once the No on Initiated Measure 21 groups got moving, I suspect numbers started moving against it in such a way that there’s no clear indication how the vote is going to go tonight.  Whatever it is, I think it’s going to be close.

Initiated Measure 22, the bill to handout taxpayer dollars to politicians has had a lot of money thrown at it from either side. But both being down ballot, having state leaders against it, and bearing the title of “CREATE A PUBLICLY FUNDED CAMPAIGN FINANCE PROGRAM” as part of the measure, I think it’s toast.

Despite it’s cute advertising, Initiated Measure 23 is going to go down hard. You can take take that to the bank.

And RL 19 and 20 are going to go down, because people have lost interest at this point, and neither have had good reasons noted to vote for them.

Agree?  Disagree? The floor is yours.

As we come to the close, here are my House Race Predictions

Jeez… the more I look at it, the more I think the election in South Dakota is going to be an electoral disaster for Democrats.

District

Race

Name

Party

Predictions

Notes

District 01

State Representative

Steven D. McCleerey

DEM

Dem Over

 

District 01

State Representative

Susan Wismer

DEM

Dem Over

District 02

State Representative

John Graham

DEM

 

Graham against 2
incumbents. GOP should do well.

District 02

State Representative

Lana Greenfield

REP

GOP

District 02

State Representative

Burt Tulson

REP

GOP

District 03

State Representative

Nikki Bootz

DEM

 

This was never a race.

District 03

State Representative

Brooks Briscoe

DEM

 

District 03

State Representative

Drew Dennert

REP

GOP

District 03

State Representative

Daniel Kaiser

REP

GOP

District 04

State Representative

Matt Rosdahl

DEM

 

Democrats didn’t run a race. At all. 

District 04

State Representative

Peggy Schuelke

DEM

 

District 04

State Representative

John Mills

REP

GOP

District 04

State Representative

Jason W. Kettwig

REP

GOP

District 05

State Representative

Michele Alvine

DEM

 

District 05

State Representative

Charles “Chuck”
Haan

IND

 

District 05

State Representative

Hugh M. Bartels

REP

GOP

District 05

State Representative

Nancy York

REP

GOP

District 06

State Representative

Clara Hart

DEM

 

Latterell and Otten will win. This is not a contest. Hart was loaded with cash, but I don’t know if it was evident.

District 06

State Representative

Kyle Rogers

DEM

 

District 06

State Representative

Isaac Latterell

REP

GOP

District 06

State Representative

Herman Otten

REP

GOP

District 07

State Representative

Linda A. Brandt

DEM

 

Reed will win, and Hawley
will win. It’s the Brookings way for the State’s biggest swing district.

District 07

State Representative

Spencer Hawley

DEM

Dem

District 07

State Representative

Tim Reed

REP

GOP

District 08

State Representative

Kory Rawstern

DEM

 

Word is Unger is running stronger than expected, but I expect Heinemann as incumbent to be safe. 

District 08

State Representative

Jason Unger

DEM

 

District 08

State Representative

Leslie Heinemann

REP

GOP

District 08

State Representative

Mathew Wollmann

REP

GOP

District 09

State Representative

Mark G. Guthmiller

DEM

 

This is a toss-up district. Saba spent money, but Clark is well thought of. 

District 09

State Representative

Michael Saba

DEM

Toss up

District 09

State Representative

Michael Clark

REP

Toss up

District 09

State Representative

Wayne H. Steinhauer

REP

GOP

District 10

State Representative

Dean Kurtz

DEM

 

This District will remain
strong GOP.

District 10

State Representative

Paul Vanderlinde

DEM

 

District 10

State Representative

Don Haggar

REP

GOP

District 10

State Representative

Steven Haugaard

REP

GOP

District 11

State Representative

Leona Weiland

DEM

 

District 11

State Representative

Paul Schipper

DEM

 

District 11

State Representative

Chris Karr

REP

GOP

District 11

State Representative

Mark K Willadsen

REP

GOP

District 12

State Representative

Bob Benson

DEM

 

District 12

State Representative

Susan Randall

DEM

 

District 12

State Representative

Arch Beal

REP

GOP

District 12

State Representative

Greg Jamison

REP

GOP

District 13

State Representative

P. James Eckhoff Jr

DEM

 

.

District 13

State Representative

Ellee Spawn

DEM

 

District 13

State Representative

G. Mark Mickelson

REP

GOP

District 13

State Representative

Sue Lucas-Peterson

REP

GOP

District 14

State Representative

Valerie Loudenback

DEM

 

LaPlante was a good substitution, but Holmes & Zikmund are good campaigners. Advantage GOP.

District 14

State Representative

Michael LaPlante

DEM

 

District 14

State Representative

Tom Holmes

REP

GOP

District 14

State Representative

Larry P. Zikmund

REP

GOP

District 15

State Representative

Jamie Smith

DEM

 

Leggett has had a go around before, and ready to go this year. Myers apparently moved to Minn.

District 15

State Representative

Karen Soli

DEM

Dem

District 15

State Representative

Eric Leggett

IND

Indy

District 15

State Representative

Mike Myers

IND

 

District 16

State Representative

Ted Curry

DEM

 

I don’t have a good enough read, but my people down there indicate Tornberg hasn’t run half the race she did last time. 

District 16

State Representative

Ann Tornberg

DEM

 

District 16

State Representative

Kevin D. Jensen

REP

GOP

District 16

State Representative

David L. Anderson

REP

GOP

District 17

State Representative

Ray Ring

DEM

Dem

The incumbents will be
tough to beat.

District 17

State Representative

Mark Winegar

DEM

 

District 17

State Representative

Debbie Pease

REP

 

District 17

State Representative

Nancy Rasmussen

REP

GOP

District 18

State Representative

David Allen

DEM

 

Hunhoff & Stevens will dominate the race.

District 18

State Representative

Peter Rossiter

DEM

 

District 18

State Representative

Jean M. Hunhoff

REP

GOP

District 18

State Representative

Mike Stevens

REP

GOP

District 19

State Representative

Melissa Mentele

DEM

 

District 19

State Representative

Kent S. Peterson

REP

GOP

District 19

State Representative

Kyle Schoenfish

REP

GOP

District 20

State Representative

Lance Carson

REP

GOP

 

District 20

State Representative

Tona Rozum

REP

GOP

District 21

State Representative

Juile Bartling

DEM

Strong Dem

Another one for each
party here. Even the Republicans like Julie (possibly because she votes with
them on many issues).

District 21

State Representative

Gary Burrus

DEM

 

District 21

State Representative

Lee Qualm

REP

Strong GOP

District 22

State Representative

Carmen Dannenbring

DEM

District 22

State Representative

Joan Wollschlager

DEM

District 22

State Representative

Roger Chase

REP

GOP

District 22

State Representative

Bob Glanzer

REP

GOP

District 23

State Representative

John A. Lake

REP

GOP Over

 

District 23

State Representative

Spencer Gosch

REP

GOP Over

District 24

State Representative

Mary Duvall

REP

GOP Over

 

District 24

State Representative

Tim Rounds

REP

GOP Over

District 25

State Representative

David Haagenson

DEM

 

I want Pischke to win, because he’s a good guy, and a good candidate. But you can’t always get what you want.

District 25

State Representative

Dan Ahlers

DEM

Toss Up

District 25

State Representative

Roger Hunt

REP

GOP

District 25

State Representative

Tom Pischke

REP

Toss Up

District 26A

State Representative

Shawn Bordeaux

DEM

Dem Over

 

District 26B

State Representative

James Schaefer

REP

GOP Over

 

District 27

State Representative

Jim Bradford

DEM

Dem

This is tough territory for the GOP, and conventional wisdom is that Liz May’s luck may have run out.

District 27

State Representative

Red Dawn Foster

DEM

Toss Up

District 27

State Representative

Steve Livermont

REP

District 27

State Representative

Elizabeth May

REP

Toss Up

District 28A

State Representative

Oren Lesmeister

DEM

Dem Over

 

District 28B

State Representative

Sam Marty

REP

GOP Over

 

District 29

State Representative

Thomas J. Brunner

REP

GOP Over

 

District 29

State Representative

Larry Rhoden

REP

GOP Over

District 30

State Representative

Sandy Arseneault

DEM

 

Dems are not elected in
this District, but the county extension officer might give you a dollar for
each tail you bring in. This race is over.

District 30

State Representative

Kristine Ina Winter

DEM

 

District 30

State Representative

Julie Frye-Mueller

REP

GOP

District 30

State Representative

Tim R. Goodwin

REP

GOP

District 31

State Representative

Timothy R. Johns

REP

GOP Over

 

District 31

State Representative

Charles M. Turbiville

REP

GOP Over

District 32

State Representative

Nik Aberle

DEM

 

This race is over.

District 32

State Representative

Susan Kelts

DEM

 

District 32

State Representative

Sean McPherson

REP

GOP

District 32

State Representative

Kristin A. Conzet

REP

GOP

District 33

State Representative

Jim Hadd

DEM

 

This race is over.

District 33

State Representative

Ethan Marsland

DEM

 

District 33

State Representative

Taffy Howard

REP

GOP

District 33

State Representative

David Johnson

REP

GOP

District 34

State Representative

Steve Stenson

DEM

 

This race is over.

District 34

State Representative

Dan Dryden/Dave Lust

REP

GOP

District 34

State Representative

Craig Tieszen

REP

GOP

District 35

State Representative

Dave Freytag

DEM

 

This race is over.

District 35

State Representative

Michael T Hanson

DEM

 

District 35

State Representative

Blaine “Chip”
Campbell

REP

GOP

District 35

State Representative

Lynne DiSanto

REP

GOP

I don’t see any good news in the card for Democrats, as Republicans continue to maintain what would normally be impossibly high numbers of legislators.

After going through the past 2 legislative sessions with a count of 58 Republicans to 12 Democrats, in taking the thousand foot view of this years’ house races, I’m coming up with a count of 57 Republican Seats, 9 Democrats, 3 toss ups, and 1 Independent (Kudos to Eric Leggett, whom I hear has really gone after it this year).

If we give all the toss-up races to Democrats… that would leave them at 12, with Republicans losing 1 seat to an independent who would probably vote with them on most issues anyway.

Even if the GOP loses one or two that I’m counting in our column at the moment, there’s not a lot for Democrats to cheer about. They’ve taken their dismal number of legislators, and managed to maintain it.

Release: Marsy’s Law To Hold Election Night Party In Sioux Falls

Marsy’s Law To Hold Election Night Party In Sioux Falls 

marsys law(Pierre, SD)—The Marsy’s Law for South Dakota campaign is holding an election night party in Sioux Falls on Tuesday, November 8.  The event will be held in the Revir Ballroom at the Downtown Hilton Garden Inn located at 201 E. 8th St, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.  The public is invited.  The event will start at 7:00pm and last until 11:00pm.

Representatives from the Marsy’s Law campaign, including prosecutors, victims and victim advocates will be available for press interviews.

Representatives will also be available for phone interviews at 605-280-7767.

“We are humbled by the outpouring of support we have received across the state,” said Jason Glodt, former Assistant Attorney General and State Director for Marsy’s Law for South Dakota. “Volunteers have been working tirelessly across the state for months asking people to give equal rights to crime victims. On Election Day, we have the opportunity to make history for victim rights in South Dakota!” 

###

“There are no secrets that time does not reveal.” (Jean Racine)

As of Friday, almost 40 million Americans have already voted and there will be roughly 80 million votes cast tomorrow. In other words, the election will very soon be over except for counting the ballots.  Within 48 hours, this thread will become moot.

According to realclearpolitics.com, average of all polls, Hillary leads Trump by roughly 3% with roughly 7% who are undecided.  This translates into a Hillary Clinton lead in the Electoral College Votes 301 to 237. 270 Electoral Votes needed to win. 269 Electoral Votes is a tie.

In other words, for Trump to win, he has to win states which total 33 electoral votes currently in the Clinton column (actually 32 as it would be likely the House would elect Trump if there is a tie).

Going into the election right now, Clinton has in the bank 203 Electoral Votes vs. 164 for Trump (“in the bank” is shorthand for leading in the polls by more than 5%).

The following is my cheat sheet. If a “Likely Winner” loses a state I’ve allocated to them, they must pick it up somewhere else.

  • If Clinton loses Pennsylvania, Virginia or Michigan, she must win Florida. If she loses two of these three, call the election for Trump.
  • If Trump loses Ohio or Georgia, he would have to win Virginia and New Mexico or Virginia and Colorado.   As winning Virginia is unlikely with Senator Kaine on the ticket, a loss in Ohio or Georgia calls the race for Clinton.
  • If Clinton wins North Carolina and New Hampshire, Florida likely won’t matter.
  • If Florida matters, we will have another infamous Florida re-count.
State Polls Close (CST) Electoral Votes Likely Winner Electoral College Votes Comments
Maine CD #2 5:00 p.m. 1 DJT 203-165 DJT losing here could foreshadow NH
Maine Statewide 5:00 p.m. 2 HRC 205-165 HRC losing here could foreshadow NH
Virginia 6:00 p.m. 13 HRC 218-165 Sen. Kaine on ticket makes this likely HRC
Georgia 6:00 p.m. 16 DJT 218-181 DJT losing here foreshadows NC
Ohio 6:30 p.m. 18 DJT 218-199 Trump been holding lead for weeks
North Carolina 6:30 p.m. 15 Virtually tied
Florida 7:00 p.m. 29 Virtually tied
New Hampshire 7:00 p.m. 4 Virtually tied
Pennsylvania 7:00 p.m. 20 HRC 238-199 If Trump wins, he will win the election
Michigan 7:00 p.m. 16 HRC 254-199 If Trump wins, he will win the election
Iowa 7:30 p.m. 6 DJT 254-205 Trump been holding lead for weeks
Colorado 8:00 p.m. 9 HRC 263-205 Trump needs Independent candidates to do well
New Mexico 8:00 p.m. 5 HRC 268-205 Unpredictable with NM former Gov. on ballot
Arizona 8:00 p.m. 11 DJT 268-216 Trump loss foreshadows Nevada and NM
Nevada 9:00 p.m. 6 268-216 Virtually tied

There are some very interesting linkages because of similarities of the respective states.

  • If Trump loses Maine CD#2, it becomes likely he will lose New Hampshire. Similarly, if Clinton loses Maine Statewide, it becomes likely she will lose New Hampshire. Either one could be enough to tip the scales one way or another so the election could be “over” before our polls close barring an upset in New Mexico.
  • If Clinton loses Virginia, she will lose North Carolina. Similarly, if Trump loses Georgia, he will lose North Carolina.
  • If Clinton loses Pennsylvania, she could very possibly lose Michigan and Wisconsin where it would be a run-away.
  • If Trump wins New Mexico, he will likely win Nevada and a New Mexico win would negate a loss of Maine CD#2 and New Hampshire.

As you can see, Trump has to hold ALL STATES he leads by 3% or more and run the table on the states that are virtually tied (Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, and Nevada). If he runs the table but loses just Maine CD#1, we have a tied Electoral College and the House will select the next President of the United States.

The good news is Trump doesn’t have to win a state he is currently behind by more than 3% to win the election. The bad news is he has to win all the four closest states (FL, NC, NH, & NV).  In short, odds of Trump winning are the same as flipping a coin twice and both landing on heads.

The American body politic is deeply divided with roughly 45% on the liberal side and 45% on the conservative side.  There is about 5% which lean each way.  It is my opinion that this election will be decided by the very middle 5% of the American body politic.  These people usually confound the pollsters as they move generally in block on Election Day which explains Obama beating polls in 2008 and 2012 and Bush in 2004 or Reagan in 1980.

My gut:  Watch Maine CD#2 & Maine Statewide. If both go one way, I think it will foreshadow the winner.  That said, all of America is watching to see what happens in Florida.  Been there and done that for the last four elections.  Might as well keep it up.

P.S.  Sorry about the format.  Did the best I could in the time I had.  Not the graphics wiz Pat is.