Toxic Doeden-Pac text blasts cause Republicans to lose in Brookings local election races

Recall a couple weeks back when I pointed out how the Political Action Committee affiliated with Toby Doeden intruded into in the Brookings Municipal and School Board races without being invited?

Both Al Austreim running for Brookings City Council and Kelsey Bowman running for Brookings School Board are registered Republicans, and had been putting forth a respectable effort in running with signs, mailers and the such going out in what had been a sleepy contest.

And then this text message hit this morning:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Toby Doeden’s, Dakota First Action had fired off a text message in support of local Brookings candidates Kelsey Bowman and Al Austreim in the April 8 election, It was surprising, considering the PAC had shown no interest to date in the race.  The problem with Doeden getting involved in this race for these two candidates is that Doeden and his PAC are not just a little radioactive:

Read that entire story here.

These two decent Republican candidates found their campaigns unfortunately “Doedened”  as they were endorsed by the most toxic person in South Dakota politics today. And it had an effect.

With both races a three-way race for 2 seats, after the Doeden anchor was tied around them, they found themselves falling short on election day in both cases by 150 votes or less, as the polarizing PAC tried to make them their own with continued text blasts in Kelsey’s race.   Without the Doeden Fire-Dumpster attached to them, they would have had a broader base in the community. But being anchored to his PAC?  Doeden declared that they were hard-right conservatives in a town that does not elect hard-right conservatives.

I’m sure today they’re saying thanks for nothing, jerk.  Because no one asked for the toxic kiss of death to be thrown in what was once a nice homegrown, grassroots effort.

They really, really hate me. Eschenbaum interview with the kooks, and the first words out of their mouth are “Pat Powers”

I’m in their heads! I’m in their heads! ha ha ha ha!

32-Year Democrat and South Dakota Republican Party Chairman Jim Eschenbaum gave an hour-long interview to one of the “so hard right they’re left” kooks, Katie Hoffman out in Spearfish for her Rumble channel.

Was the first topic how much the GOP is going to raise over the next cycle? No. Was it about the challenges of what the party may face in the upcoming 2026 general elections? No. 

It was about… me.. One person described it to me as “PDS” or Powers Derangement Syndrome, but I told them I prefer a cruder “PMS,” as in “Pat Powers is a MF Syndrome.

Either way you cut it when it’s the absolute first thing out of their mouths, obviously I’m under their skin.

“So first, since Pat Powers likes to,  know,  dig on us a bit,  I thought it would be fun to talk about how he likes to give you a hard time about being a Democrat. At first, I guess. And um, if you wanted to just give a brief background about your political journey, about where you started verus where you are now…”

“I will. Um, And On the topic of Pat Powers, I never, ever go to his site. Almost daily Katie somebody says ‘you need to go and see what Pat Powers is saying about you.’ I said I refuse to give Pat Powers a click. The South Dakota GOP fired him from their uh ranks and relationship for a reason.. because I think he’s extremely liberal myself. But whatever. He can.. We live in a free country and he can say whatever he wants to say. But I don’t bother myself.. I do not bother myself with going to see what he’s posting on his site.”

“I have posted on his site in the past. Never once without signing my name.  To what I posted on his site to what I say, and he will delete your comment if he doesn’t like it. I will not… He’s as bad as Mark Zookerman. I left Facebook because Mark Zuckerberg censored my speech. I will not tolerate that.  On that topic, I give Pat Powers very little credibility because he will not engage in open and honest conversation if he deletes your comments and manipulates the narrative. So.. we got off on Pat Powers…”

I guess he’s spent a lot of time contemplating Pat Powers, eh?  According to my records, despite his whining about his comments I’ve allegedly deleted, his narrative doesn’t match reality, since I can’t find a single comment that actually was rejected as being off-topic.

So, there’s one thing he’s untruthful about right out of the gate.

But, as one of my daughters noted to me “If you ain’t got haters, you ain’t poppin.”  Word.

I did find amusement with the chair calling someone like me liberal, yet he defined his vote for Obama in terms of liberal identity politics, where he voted for him not for the content of his character or ideas, but literally because he was black.  But that was thrown out the door when he was faced with supporting a woman (Hillary Clinton) for president. In that instance, he cited a trail of bodies behind her, as if he spends too much time on conspiracy chat groups.

The one thing that troubled me in the hour long puff piece was later in the interview was when the interviewer was asking him if the South Dakota GOP, like the Montana GOP, could kick people out of the party.

Katie Hoffman asked. “The Montana GOP censored some of their legislators for working with their democrats. We had um like Drew Peterson outright admitted in an article that they worked with Democrats to get stuff done. I don’t know how this all works. Does that pique your interest at all?

“I’ve had 2-e-mails already are we gonna do this. If I wanted to take that power upon myself, I suppose I could say here’s what we’re gonna do. I would never to that without a vote of the entire Central Committee that is properly convened and voting at a scheduled meeting with an agenda. There would have to be a vote for censor, and a second to that motion, the discussion allowed and a vote. 

Why does this bother me? The Montana GOP did not censor anyone. They CENSURED them.

Censor: to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable.

Censure: express severe disapproval of (someone or something), especially in a formal statement.

Good gosh. If they are too stupid to know what they’re talking about, pick up a damn dictionary.

But I suspect the SDGOP not having a clue what they’re doing is going to be trending in South Dakota politics for some time to come.

Attorney General Jackley Announces Former State Employee Pleads Guilty to Four Forgery-Related Charges

Attorney General Jackley Announces Former State Employee Pleads Guilty to Four Forgery-Related Charges

PIERRE, S.D. – South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley announces a Springfield, S.D. woman has pleaded guilty to four forgery-related charges connected to crimes committed while she was an employee of the South Dakota Department of Public Safety and performing contract work for the Department of Health.

Renee Strong, 55, pleaded guilty Tuesday in Hughes County Circuit Court to two Class 6 felony counts of Offering False or Forged Instruments for Filing or Recording in a Public Office and two Class 5 felony counts of Forgery.  She will be sentenced at 10:30 a.m. June 10.

Each felony count of Offering False or Forged Instruments for Filing or Recording in a Public Office carries a maximum sentence of two years in prison and a $4,000 fine. Each felony count of Forgery carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

Strong is accused of forging and falsifying food service inspection reports while performing inspections for the Department of Health through a contract with the Department of Public Safety.

South Dakota’s Division of Criminal Investigation (DCI) investigated the case, and the Attorney General’s Office is prosecuting the case.

 -30-

Family Voice Action releases scorecard; penalizes legislators for failing to vote to lock up librarians, voting against child marriage, and if they didn’t want the 10 commandments posted in the welding shop

The far-right religious group Family Voice Action released a scorecard for the 2025 South Dakota Legislative Session today.

And in a reverse of what many South Dakotans believe, they took legislators to task for such things as failing to vote to lock up librarians in jail, and if they voted against child marriage.  Of course, they dinged those who refused to strip money away from Public Schools in the Odenbach voucher bill that was blown away early in the session.  In part..

Explanation of Scorecard

S = A vote in support of our position  O = A vote opposed to our position
Green Bill Title = A bill we supported
Red Bill Title = A bill we opposed Bill titles reflect a layman’s description of the legislation, not their official titles

Education Savings AccountsHB1020 – An act to establish ESA’s (Education Savings Accounts) in South Dakota

 Obscenity ExemptionsHB1239 – An act to remove a current exemption which enables schools, libraries and museums to ignore the “obscenity” and “harmful to minors” laws

Senate Note: The Senate Chamber did not vote on the original text of HB1239. Instead, the bill was “hoghoused” by an unfriendly amendment – this hoghouse vote was used in the Senate scorecard.

House Note: The House Chamber originally voted in favor of HB1239, but later voted in favor of the Senate’s unfriendly hoghouse of the bill. The two votes were combined in the House scorecard, with half weight being given to each vote

 …

60% Vote ThresholdHJR5003 – A resolution, to be placed on the ballot in 2026, asking the voters if they want a 60% threshold placed on future constitutional amendments, rather than the current 50% threshold

Signature RequirementsHB1169 – An act to require that a small portion of signatures be gathered from each senatorial district for future initiated constitutional amendments

Note: After governor Rhoden’s veto of HB1169, each chamber had a “veto override” vote. The original vote on the bill and the veto override vote were combined in the scorecard, with half weight being given to each vote.

10 CommandmentsSB51 – An act to require the placement of the 10 Commandments in each public school classroom and require the inclusion of the 10 Commandments, Constitution, and other historical documents in public school curriculum Senate Note: SD Family Voice Action did not endorse SB51 until after it had left the Senate, therefore the bill was not included in the Senate scorecard

Marriage Age – SB156 – An act to prohibit marriage for 16 or 17 year olds, even if parental consent was given

If legislators received 100% on this scorecard, they are likely going to have to do some explaining to their constituents at some point.

If every vote matters, why did Toby Doeden skip so many?

This paid advertisement was in my twitter stream today:

Toby Doeden is out there with a paid ad on Twitter declaring that every vote matters.   If that’s the case, then up until last year, why did he skip every Republican Primary election and a couple of general elections for most of his life, if you recall my prior post on the topic.

Read that here.

Really?

I think the only thing worse would be trying to claim you’re the state’s Republican thought leader after being a Democrat for almost all of your adult life.

Ope!

Just saying.

Thune: Senate Republicans to Overturn Biden Administration Anti-Energy Regulations

Thune: Senate Republicans to Overturn Biden Administration Anti-Energy Regulations

 “[T]he American people called for a new direction this past November, and the Trump administration and the Republican majorities in Congress have wasted no time getting to work to provide relief from burdensome regulations, especially when it comes to energy.”

WASHINGTON — U.S. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) today delivered the following remarks on the Senate floor:

Click here to watch the video.

 

Northern Plains News: Sen. Rounds Co-Sponsors Bill to Keep AM Radio in New Vehicles

Sen. Rounds Co-Sponsors Bill to Keep AM Radio in New Vehicles
By Todd Epp, Northern Plains News

South Dakota Sen. Mike Rounds has joined a bipartisan effort to ensure AM radio remains available in all new vehicles, citing the medium’s importance for rural communities and emergency communications.

Rounds is among 60 senators now co-sponsoring the AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act, which would require automakers to maintain AM radio capability in new vehicles at no additional cost to consumers.

“I grew up listening to KCCR on 1240 and KGFX on 1060, especially when I delivered newspapers throughout the Pierre area. It made the time go by quick!” Rounds said in a 2023 news release when he initially co-sponsored the legislation. “Free AM broadcast radio has been an important resource for decades. Whether someone is in their car or tractor, AM radio is a valuable tool to share local news and emergency information.”

The bill, originally introduced by Sens. Ed Markey, D-Mass., and Ted Cruz, R-Texas, has now reached a critical threshold with 60 co-sponsors – enough to overcome a potential filibuster in the Senate, according to a statement from Markey’s office. Sens. Markey and Cruz reintroduced the legislation in January 2025 as the AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act of 2025. It had 62 co-sponsors, including Sens. John Hoeven and Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., and Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith, DFL-Minn.

“AM radio is a lifeline for people across the country for news, sports, and especially emergency information,” Markey said in a press release last month. “Tens of millions of listeners across the country have made clear that they want AM radio to remain in their vehicles. Our AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act heeds their words and ensures that this essential tool doesn’t get lost on the dial.”

South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley has been a vocal supporter of the legislation. In October 2024, Jackley joined 11 other attorneys general in urging Congress to pass the bill.

“Hurricane Helene, like the severe weather we see in South Dakota, has demonstrated again the importance of AM Radio as a vital communication device that provides life-saving information to our citizens,” Jackley said in an Oct. 4, 2024, news release. “AM Radio is important in rural states like South Dakota where people can turn to for severe weather updates and emergency information along with local news and sports.”

In June 2023, Jackley joined with counterparts in 16 other states to encourage Congress to pass the legislation. “AM radio serves an important role in rural states such as South Dakota,” Jackley said at the time, according to Iowa Agribusiness Radio Network.

South Dakota U.S. Rep. Dusty Johnson was among more than 100 lawmakers who signed a letter to automakers in May 2023 expressing concerns about the removal of AM radio receivers in vehicles. The letter highlighted the need for rural Americans to access AM radio, given limited internet and cell phone connectivity.

Several major automakers have already begun removing AM radio from their vehicles, particularly electric models. BMW, Mazda, Volvo, Volkswagen, Tesla, and Ford are among the manufacturers that have either eliminated or announced plans to phase out AM radio from their newer vehicles, according to a March 2023 statement from Markey’s office.

Manufacturers typically cite electromagnetic interference as the primary reason for removing AM radio from electric vehicles. “Electric motors can interfere with AM radio signals, causing undesirable static noise during broadcasts,” The Hill reported last year.

However, automakers and tech industry groups have recently stepped up their opposition to the mandate. In a joint letter to Congress, the Zero Emission Transportation Association (ZETA), Consumer Technology Association, Alliance for Automotive Innovation, and TechNet argued that “requiring manufacturers to use a particular technology will slow innovation and reduce consumer preference.”

“Requiring the installation of analog AM radios in automobiles is an unnecessary action that would impact EV range, efficiency, and affordability at a critical moment of accelerating adoption,” said Albert Gore, executive director of ZETA, in a statement to Reuters. “Mandating AM radio would do little to expand drivers’ ability to receive emergency alerts.”

The Consumer Technology Association compared the mandate to requiring outdated technology in a statement to The Washington Post.

“Mandating AM radio would be like mandating CD or cassette players in new vehicles,” CTA said. “This outdated and counterproductive measure will stifle innovation and impose unnecessary costs on automakers, ultimately increasing prices for consumers.”

John Bozzella, president and CEO of Alliance for Automotive Innovation, and other industry leaders, warned in their letter that “to accommodate analog AM radio, certain carmakers may need to scrap advanced safety features.”

According to the bill text, the legislation would direct the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to require all new vehicles manufactured or imported for sale in the United States to include AM broadcast radio receivers at no additional cost. It would also provide small vehicle manufacturers at least four years after the Department of Transportation issues the rule to comply. The measure would also require automakers to inform consumers, during the period before the rule takes effect, that their vehicles do not maintain access to broadcast AM radio.

“NAB applauds the Senate Commerce Committee for rapidly advancing the AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act with overwhelming bipartisan support,” Curtis LeGeyt, NAB president and CEO, said in a statement. “In just one week since its introduction, this legislation has already gained nearly half of the Senate as co-sponsors and cleared a key committee, demonstrating the broad recognition of AM radio’s vital role in keeping Americans informed and safe.”

FCC Commissioner Nathan Simington also weighed in on the agency’s website.

“The Commission should not be shy about asking auto manufacturers to serve the public interest by continuing to serve AM radio listeners,” he wrote.

The National Association of Farm Broadcasting’s Board of Directors issued a warning in a public statement.

“Failure to approve this critical AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act will allow automakers to eliminate access to critical information to the people we serve,” they said. “Rural and urban residents should not be forced to subscribe to an unreliable data stream for urgent information.”

FEMA Integrated Public Alert & Warning System Program Manager Manny Centeno has emphasized that AM radio is the backbone of the nation’s public warning system. Nearly 80 AM radio stations across the country are Primary Entry Points for emergency alerts distributed by FEMA and the National Weather Service, covering approximately 90% of the U.S. population.

The bill now awaits further action in the Senate.

–30–

Todd Epp is the editor and publisher of Northern Plains News, LLC in Harrisburg, S.D., an independent news organization.