Release: South Dakota PUC grants construction permit with conditions for Deuel Harvest North Wind Farm

Pat Powers

South Dakota PUC grants construction permit with conditions for Deuel Harvest North Wind Farm

PIERRE, S.D. – South Dakota Public Utilities Commissioners voted to approve a permit, with conditions, for the construction of the Deuel Harvest North Wind Farm, a wind energy facility in Deuel County capable of producing up to 310.1 megawatts of energy. The action was taken at the commission’s regular meeting in Pierre on May 14.

The proposed project is expected to include up to 112 wind turbines and associated facilities, including a 345-kilovolt transmission line with an associated 345-kV interconnection substation located in Glenwood Township. Deuel Harvest expects to complete the $400 million project, spanning an approximately 48,730-acre project area, in 2020. A buyer for the power produced by the project has not been announced.

PUC staff and Deuel Harvest proposed more than 40 permit conditions that addressed issues including road conditions during construction, habitats of threatened or endangered species, assignment of a public liaison officer, land restoration, shadow flicker, detecting and reacting to ice conditions on turbine blades, and avian and bat mortality. The commission delved into other proposed conditions and made changes to those dealing with sound levels, cultural resources reporting, aircraft detection lighting systems, decommissioning, and turbine distances relating to both Lake Alice and Homan Air Field.

“Recently we’ve had too many arduous wind applications to deal with simultaneously, so we appreciate the patience of everyone participating in this docket,” noted PUC Chairman Gary Hanson. “Speaking for the commissioners, we really appreciate the citizen intervenors and PUC staff for all of their insight,“ Hanson said.

PUC Vice Chairman Chris Nelson commented on the commission’s authority in granting the permit with conditions. “The commission has to base its decision on what has been presented in the record and what state law allows us to do. Sometimes the supporting evidence we’d like to see isn’t there, but I think we were able to develop appropriate conditions with the information we have,” he stated.

“These dockets are difficult,” Commissioner Kristie Fiegen explained. “It’s so hard to balance the interests of landowners and wind developers. When I’m looking at an application as a commissioner, I really have to look at safety and welfare. I want to make sure that we’re protecting citizens to the best of our ability.”

Deuel Harvest filed its application with the PUC on Nov. 30, 2018. State law currently requires the commission to make a decision within six months of receiving a wind energy facility application. A public input meeting was held in Clear Lake in January. A four-day evidentiary hearing was held in Pierre in April. Parties to the docket included Deuel Harvest Wind Energy, PUC staff and seven intervenors. Intervenors John Homan, Watertown; Jon Henslin, Clear Lake; Will Stone and Heath Stone, Gary; Otter Tail Power Co.; and Minnesota residents Christina Kilby, Burnsville; and Garrett Homan, Hermanville, were active participants at the formal hearing and related proceedings.

The Deuel Harvest North Wind Project docket can be viewed on the PUC’s website at www.puc.sd.gov, Commission Actions, Electric Dockets, 2018 Electric Dockets, EL18-053 – In the Matter of the Application of Deuel Harvest Wind Energy, LLC for a Permit of a Wind Energy Facility and a 345-kV Transmission Line in Deuel County.

-30-

13 thoughts on “Release: South Dakota PUC grants construction permit with conditions for Deuel Harvest North Wind Farm”

  1. Windmills. Weeeee. And if it doesn’t blow, you can forget about television for that night.

    1. That is the reason for a backup plan. I personally am not sold on wind energy. I am not convinced it is cost effective. But seeing as how the wind usually blows in South Dakota the turbines should be able to produce the electricity advertised. In the event the wind does not blow, then the other producers of electricity have to step up.

      1. If you have a windmill anywhere near your house, congratulations, your house just went down 75 percent in value. And the noise causes cancer.

        1. The *noise* causes cancer? I’ll need to read up on that one. So much to learn, so little time.

  2. Straight out of the subsidy handbook. Raising the cost of electricity while weakening the grid. An elaborate scheme that our elected officials are participating in with the promise of campaign contributions. Meanwhile, our pristine landscape is altered under the guise of a virtue signal.

  3. Subsidies?! what about the farm subsidies that are now the only way farmers can stay afloat thanks to the orange man’s tarrifs?

    Buehler…..
    Buehler…..

    1. Had Noem not vetoed growing hemp things may be looking better for some farmers?

      Also… C + I + G + (X-M) = the size of the economic activity taking place. You don’t know about the economic growth the U.S. has had since the tariffs have been implemented, do you? Be more like ‘a friend of education’ and do more research.

  4. I get it if people don’t like the federal wind subsidies. But that is a federal issue, but that is a way more complicated issue than just wind power, as we would need to start talking about ethanol, coal, natural gas, oil, solar (who all have subsidies/tax breaks of their own) all at the same time. I really don’t understand the local opposition to wind. Neighbors want to limit a landowner from allowing development on their own property using junk science about towers causing cancer?? Really??? Are we going to allow neighbors to prevent farming because they don’t like it saying that cows or pesticides cause cancer? Anti-Wind folks are the biggest opponents to property rights that there are.

Comments are closed.