Release: The SD GOP is in Trouble

The SD GOP is in Trouble

Joe Kirby, Chairman of South Dakota Open Primaries announced, “Many Republican party loyalists are planning to vote No on Amendment H in the mistaken belief that they can go back to business as usual in South Dakota politics. They couldn’t be more mistaken. The SD GOP has undergone a significant change in the last few years that many Republicans have not noticed.”

“It began with the uprising at the 2022 Republican party convention in Watertown when the incumbent Secretary of State was not renominated. Then, 48% of the convention voted to not support Thune, Dusty, and Noem in the fall election. It continued in the June 2024 primary when a dozen incumbents were primaried. The party is engaged in an internal civil war.”

“Because of the uncertainty and infighting, fundraising for the Republican party and candidates has dried up. Many candidates received no or only minimal support from the party.”

Kirby continued, “Mainstream GOP traditions and history are under attack from a fringe group of ‘conservatives’ who aren’t really conservative at all. The only solution on the table is Amendment H. If it passes, the party will find itself recommitted to traditional South Dakota values, and answerable to the majority of our conservative populace.”

Republican SD Senator Michael Rohl said, “If Amendment H doesn’t pass, the future of our party and state looks murky. It could be a political train wreck. The decision is clear to me: A Yes vote means I need to listen to my district, a No vote means I should listen to party bosses.”

Republican SD Senate Leader Lee Schoenbeck said, “The Republican party we have built over the last fifty years is being taken over by fringe people that Bill Janklow, Jim Abdnor and George Mickelson wouldn’t recognize. Republican leaders were practical conservatives we could be proud of. The new fringe that’s taken over the South Dakota GOP are not conservatives, they are crazy. If Amendment H fails, we lose our party to extremists.”

Kirby added, “Amendment H is on the November 5th ballot. All candidates for an office would be listed on a single ballot. All legal voters would get that ballot. The top two vote getters would move on to the general election. Most importantly, all voters would get to vote. Democracy works best when all voters get to vote. Vote YES on H!”

####

10 thoughts on “Release: The SD GOP is in Trouble”

  1. They are right. Many mainstream SD Republicans are unaware of what has been going on in their party. The future is not bright if Amendment H fails.

  2. This clown 🤡 opposing Amendment H is actually the best reason yet we’ve heard for voting YES on H.
    If a proud flunked out of school, conspiracy nut, election denier, anti-vaxxer, anti-mask even during surgical procedures, holocaust denier, alleged NAZI supporter pretending to be republican, Toby Doeden and his affiliated Doeden Dumpster Divers are opposing something, all you need to do is go the opposite direction. This guarantees you will almost always be correct.
    Michael Rohl is a terrific legislator – who also loves everything conservatives stand for. VOTE YES on Amendment H.

  3. Our state is going to have a serious problem on our hands for years to come if H doesn’t pass. H should pass simply because it’s a more fair system. I wish more Republican lawmakers and leaders could put self-interest aside and support this important initiative. Even if they don’t care about fairness, they should care about the future of their party and the state.

  4. H will be a win/win for some, a lose/lose for others.

    Like a finely crafted turd sandwich.

    Like a very lively night crawler you’re trying to get a grip on.

    Seems to me:
    The people that really ran the party in the ground through arrogance and exuberant bravado are trying to scuttle the ship with a “YES” vote.

    How does this create a future proof economy?

    If a YES vote creates a future proof economy for South Dakotans and self governance for South Dakotans, that I’m a YES. Otherwise, if a NO vote does these things, then I’m a NO vote.

    Also, the price of T-Bone steak is too darned HIGH!

  5. Every reason cited by proponents is exactly why H is not needed….if their premise is prophetic and the party as it stands fragments those who move on will simply move to a different flag(s). At least under current law they would have to correctly identify themselves with whatever party they may choose to register with, a level of transparency H erases

    No on H

    1. There is no litmus test for being in a party currently either. It’s literally checking a box and signing a piece of paper. That’s a scape goat answer to a measure that would increase voter rights. You don’t have to join a union to work, you shouldn’t have to join a party to vote.

    2. The Conservatives with Common Sense are actually considering such an initiative, as our internal polling shows that the Amendment lettered “H” is likely to fail. We have a 1.2% margin of error. So if we formulate the Conservatives with Common Sense party, and then relabel it as “The Real Republicans”, we will quickly take over the legislatures.

      This goes to prove it’s a fight between facists and conservatives about who get’s to be called “Rich” and who has to be called “Dick.” Richy, Rich, Richard, Dick and little Dickie are all having a party.

  6. H should pass but it likely won’t. This press release is absolutely correct. The party has been hijacked by a bunch of nut jobs. This should have been the message of the H supporters from the start. The ads should have pointed out what this press release did, rather than some of the weak arguments they were using. They were never going to get the wacky right, so they should have went right after them from the beginning. I suspect the message is too late now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *