6 thoughts on “SDRTL PAC points out Kathy Tyler’s not-so-pro-life record.”
This has been an issue with Tyler since she ran the first time. She is determined to make her constituency believe that she is pro-life, but votes just the opposite when she gets to Pierre.
She actually testified in committee against a common-sense pro-life bill. And, it’s not only on pro-life bills. She’s done the same on pro-business, pro-farm, and pro-education bills.
Typical elitist democrat…thinks that she’s the only sixth grader in the third grade class. Hoping that the pro-life voters will believe her lies. How’s that working for Hillary??
John Wiik is a good guy and a thoughtful legislator…he would be a much better choice than Kathy Tyler.
VOTE John Wiik!
My belly button lint would be a better choice-at least IT doesn’t believe in murder of babies.
This is interesting and confirms what I thought after listening to Tyler’s answer at the Watertown forum. She and Wiik were asked is they would support elimination of tax-payer funding to Planned Parenthood. Wiik said he would not support “one red cent” of taxpayer dollars going to Planned Parenthood. Tyler repeated she is a “pro-life Democrat” but supports tax-payer dollars for Planned Parenthood for “all the other good things” they do.
I thought to myself that I’ve never met a pro-life person that supports funding Planned Partenthood *for any reason.* Even if you limit funding for whatever other services Planned Parenthood may or may not provide, you are still spending tax-payer money to support a company that kills the majority of unborn babies in South Dakota.
Taking a lesson from Hillary – say one thing in public and another in private, or in Tyler’s case, one thing to her constituents and another thing when in Pierre.
A vote for this person is a vote against life, plain and simple, but then a lot of far left people don’t support life, except their own.
Comments are closed.
Discover more from South Dakota War College
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
This has been an issue with Tyler since she ran the first time. She is determined to make her constituency believe that she is pro-life, but votes just the opposite when she gets to Pierre.
She actually testified in committee against a common-sense pro-life bill. And, it’s not only on pro-life bills. She’s done the same on pro-business, pro-farm, and pro-education bills.
Typical elitist democrat…thinks that she’s the only sixth grader in the third grade class. Hoping that the pro-life voters will believe her lies. How’s that working for Hillary??
John Wiik is a good guy and a thoughtful legislator…he would be a much better choice than Kathy Tyler.
VOTE John Wiik!
My belly button lint would be a better choice-at least IT doesn’t believe in murder of babies.
This is interesting and confirms what I thought after listening to Tyler’s answer at the Watertown forum. She and Wiik were asked is they would support elimination of tax-payer funding to Planned Parenthood. Wiik said he would not support “one red cent” of taxpayer dollars going to Planned Parenthood. Tyler repeated she is a “pro-life Democrat” but supports tax-payer dollars for Planned Parenthood for “all the other good things” they do.
I thought to myself that I’ve never met a pro-life person that supports funding Planned Partenthood *for any reason.* Even if you limit funding for whatever other services Planned Parenthood may or may not provide, you are still spending tax-payer money to support a company that kills the majority of unborn babies in South Dakota.
Taking a lesson from Hillary – say one thing in public and another in private, or in Tyler’s case, one thing to her constituents and another thing when in Pierre.
A vote for this person is a vote against life, plain and simple, but then a lot of far left people don’t support life, except their own.