The “No on 23” group fighting to preserve South Dakota’s Right to Work Laws against Labor Unions which want to strip that status from our state has joined advertisers row for the next few weeks.
Take a moment, and visit their website, and find out why we don’t want to be forced to pay a portion of our salaries to labor unions that we didn’t decide to join in the first place.
I don’t need any advertisements to know that this bill should go down in flames. “No” on forced unionization!!!!!!!!
I received one of the pro-union mailers with some supposedly clever statement about freeloaders, meaning those who choose not to be union members. I say, isn’t a freeloader someone who is a crappy, lazy worker who can’t get fired because the union fights the employers attempt to can that lousy employee? I think that is more apt.
Impressive list of SOUTH DAKOTA based coalition members….I see 23, like S, V and 22 is almost all out-of-state money.
I will be voting NO on all of these out of state measures.
Aw, c’mon, don’t you support New Yawk and Massachusetts values? Weiland does.
Right want all the perks of union members , but wont support.
Clearly you don’t understand how labor negotiations work.
Should say right to work for less.
This is probably the most deceptive measure on the ballot….
No where does it say this is a union bill; no where does it say right to work, no where does it say much of anything….
anything else covered by it or is it just unions…I think this measure should be defeated
Clearly my company has done well pays good wages with pension and health care.Scabs want the great wages and health care and won;t do nothing except take from the people who worked.
So only union members work hard? I don’t buy it, and I’ll be voting a resounding “NO” for this union power grab.