Article notes how SOS Monae Johnson’s view of elections evolved

There’s a good article out there today explaining what brought Secretary of State Monae Johnson around from having doubts about election security to endorsing the Democrat, Terrence Davis, who is now running for the election:

But once Johnson became responsible for running elections herself, her views started to change. By 2024, she was publicly expressing confidence in tabulators and saying South Dakota’s election system had safeguards “built in throughout the process.” And this summer, Johnson told Republican convention delegates, “I trust the county auditors to do their jobs, and I fully support the use of secure, tested ballot tabulators.”

Former Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, a Democrat, said she has seen the same evolution play out among poll workers and county officials: People sometimes get involved in elections because they are skeptical of how they work. Then they discover that the problems they expected to find are not there and that some of the fixes they imagined are not workable.

“It’s a brave thing to admit,” Boockvar said. She said she could not recall another example of a statewide election official doing so.

and..

Many of the activists who helped elect Johnson in 2022 remained unconvinced. This summer, they backed state Rep. Heather Baxter, whose campaign had called for hand-counted paper ballots and eliminating machines, for secretary of state instead.

and..

In explaining her endorsement, Johnson wrote that she now knows “the difference between campaigning for this office and carrying the responsibility of leading it.” The job, she wrote, requires “the humility to listen to professionals” and “a willingness to review new information and change course when the evidence supports doing so.”

Read the entire story here.

I think it’s important to recognize the importance of Secretary of State Johnson realizing that the extreme line of election paranoia that groups like SD Canvassing are trying to sell is only for the benefit of their organization. If we’re not led to be paranoid about election security, then they have no purpose, and the false prophets lose their ability to raise influence and to raise money.

12 thoughts on “Article notes how SOS Monae Johnson’s view of elections evolved”

  1. Real world experience changes minds. Of course our elections are safe and well run. Very conscientious public officials and volunteers have been involved in SD elections for decades. The paranoid folks have no evidence to support their worries. Put them in office and they eventually figure that out.

  2. This was a breath of fresh air from DWC. As a volunteer election worker in Minnehaha County, it frustrates me knowing there are people out there who are STILL election deniers. We work our tails off and make sure we are following every procedure to the T. Side note, pretty sure Minnehaha County Auditor Leah Anderson WAS an election denier, but like Monae, she came to her senses.

  3. I have a feeling if Heather Baxter is elected Secretary of State, she will learn the same lesson that Secretary Johnson did.

    Baxter understands that whatever she wants to accomplish will have to get approval by the South Dakota Legislature. The way that is shaping up, hand counting and getting rid of voter centers like we use in Brown County are not going to be something they will support.

    Same holds true with Terrance Davis and Tamara Lesner

    1. What do the deniers do then? Turn on Baxter just like they did monae? If that is the path then what do we do in 4 years? Find someone even crazier than Baxter… it’s a vicious cycle of drama and paranoia, let’s end it once and for all and vote Davis!

  4. Weird.

    “I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally.”
    “Serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire and California.”
    “If you count the legal votes, I easily win.”
    “We had an election that was stolen from us.”
    “It was a landslide election, and everyone knows it.”
    “I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have. Because we won the state.”
    “We won this election, and we won it by a landslide.”

    1. None of that happened in South Dakota. An ideological SOS is not going to change anything in other states. Our state election process is the gold standard in the country.

  5. Didn’t the liberal’s with Hillary become the first ones to bring up voter fraud?
    My biggest complaint is not showing a valid state issue ID when you go to vote!
    California being the worst.become

    RLTW

    1. So what you are saying is the if a person, organization, etc commits a transgression that others should follow that behavior ?

      1. I think what Steve means is that Hillary was calling Trump an “illegitimate President.” All that conspiracy BS about Russian collusion, remember? The Russians stole the election of 2016!!!

        Pretty funny to see the Democrats pointing fingers now when they were all about that 10 years ago.

        I also remember seeing people on TV back in 2000 explaining why they thought the voting machines were set to randomly flip a few votes now and then in Bush’s favor and that’s why Gore lost.

    2. It’s already illegal for noncitizens to vote in federal elections. The problem isn’t the lack of a law; it’s lack of enforcement in some cases.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *