The Top Ten SDWC political stories of 2015 (Part 1)

It’s that time of the year again, where I do an annual list of the top political stories of 2015.

Admittedly, very often my lists tend to set the stage for next year, but in politics, events of the present often foreshadow the events of days to come. Part 1 of my top ten list is no exception, as all of them will affect the upcoming legislative session, upcoming elections, and how we view South Dakota’s political class.

So, let’s get on with it, and start the countdown…

10. The Westerhuis Murder investigation.

A horrendously tragic murder-suicide of a family in Platte, SD found itself over the course of a month and a half investigation in the middle of a political firestorm whipped up by the media, conspiracy theorists, and those who would like to make political hay out of it for the sake of political gamesmanship. Welcome for what passes for propriety in South Dakota nowadays.

The employer of the Westerhuis family parents had been given notice that their employer had lost a significant federal grant administered by the state hours before the tragic deaths occurred.  The grant involved a program administered by the Co-op, the GEAR UP program. This discretionary grant program is designed to increase the number of low-income students who are prepared to enter and succeed in postsecondary education.

The grant, and the educational cooperative’s administrative handling of the program soon became an issue, with information coming to light about the state directly intervening and providing extended involvement and hand-holding in trying to get them back on track over a series of years. Some criticized the hiring decisions by the Ed Coop, others criticized the state for having not dropped the hammer to strip them of the grant earlier, and getting in too deeply involved in helping them salvage it.

Democrats wasted no time by crassly using the occasion of the Atty General reporting on the status of the murder investigation to claim that “majority party dominance has resulted in a lack of government accountability.”  Despite the fact the Educational coop is a non-partisan entity.

It’s hard to simplify this case down to a few paragraphs, but watch for legislation to be proposed and for more clucking by Dems for the TV cameras. Ultimately, little will come of it.

What’s more likely to occur will be stronger rules about state grant audits, and when state agencies need to cut the cord with programs that aren’t producing.

 

9. Legislative departures

Political resignations are always noteworthy, but 2015 was an unusual year for those political departures. Adding to the oddness were three departures in particular.

Dan Lederman File Photo 2012Dan Lederman announced his departure at the tail end of the legislative session, as his family absences coupled with increasing business demands dictated that he needed to take a step back from serving in the legislature, and as Assistant Senate Majority Leader. No one was more surprised than Senate Majority Leader Tim Rave, who announced his own retirement from the legislature shortly thereafter, due to a job change.

These departures left massive vacancies and necessitated a complete reorganization of the Republican Majority in the Senate, which led President pro tempore of the South Dakota Senate Corey Brown to step down, and assume the majority leader role.

Also of note was the departure of State Representative Steve Hickey. Hickey had been noteworthy as being involved in the demand for an investigation of Annette Bosworth for petition violations, and at the same time he announced his resignation, he was accused of similar actions as he himself had accused Annette Bosworth of. Hickey departed the country to study in Scotland, and the accusations were not deemed credible enough to pursue.

 

8. Presidential politics

We named this as one of our top stories of 2015 because the presidential race has been a hot political topic all year, and only continues to gather steam as we close out 2015. As the 2016 Presidential races have heated up, politics on both sides of the aisle have dominated conversations among South Dakotans… despite the fact caucuses and primaries were months away. South Dakota Politicians have been lining up with their candidates as well.

Senator Mike Rounds was an early supporter of Mike Huckabee, and a number of early supporters of Jeb Bush, led by Assistant House Majority Leader Steve Westra, made their support public as well. Atty and GOP activist Joel Arends was an early supporter of Donald Trump, and organized a California Event for him that liberal news organizations pounced on and attacked.

Later in the year, Both Congresswoman Kristi Noem and former GOP Chair Bob Gray came out for Marco Rubio.

 

7. Medicaid Expansion

Democrats have been long attempting to use this as a wedge issue, as they try to paint the GOP as uncaring, despite the massive costs it would promise to add to South Dakota taxpayers were this entitlement to be implemented.

Later in the year, Governor Dennis Daugaard came forth with a proposal he’s been negotiating with the federal government to offset the costs of such an increase in the welfare rolls by the federal government honoring their commitment to pay for the medical costs of Native Americans through the Indian Health Service. As described in the Argus Leader:

Currently, Medicaid-eligible American Indians can choose to receive covered services from any provider that participates in a state’s Medicaid program. Depending on where those patients seek services can affect the rates the state and federal government have to pay.

If a patient seeks care from a non-IHS or non-tribal facility, the federal government pays between 50 percent and 74 percent, while the state pays between 26 percent and 50 percent. By comparison, if that patient seeks care through an IHS or tribal provider, the feds cover 100 percent and the state doesn’t have to chip in.

This would go a long way to making such an expansion economically feasible . The question is whether legislators would view it as politically feasible, as some are already expressing concern over expanding to cover able-bodied persons, adding 10% of the state’s population to the welfare rolls.

The discussion has been pervasive in 2015, and is going to continue past the end of the year into next session.

 

6. Kristi Noem in Washington

Congresswoman Kristi Noem isn’t just having a good year – she’s having a great year in politics.   Noem’s bipartisan Human Trafficking Prevention, Intervention, and Recovery Act was passed in July, and the measure has already been recognized as increasing prosecutions. In November, she helped push the highway bill through the House. In December, Noem has helped pass the first education Noem_explainsoverhaul since 2002. And, I could go on and on.

But let’s not forget the big enchilada – Early in 2015, U.S. Rep. Kristi Noem was appointed to the House Ways and Means Committee. Noem, the first South Dakota member of Congress to serve in the committee, has jurisdiction over tax, trade and other economic policies. Her higher profile has kept her in the spotlight, and she shows no signs of slowing down.

Noem is literally at the current height of her power and influence in Washington, and it shows with her strong popularity in her home state.  A weak opponent , State Representative Paula Hawks has already caused the race to be labeled by national prognosticators as going “Strong Republican,” and her fundraising has proven to be more anemic than that of Noem’s unknown 2014 opponent.

Stick a fork in this race for 2016. It has already been won.

Stay tuned for part 2!

Thankful for everything this Christmas.

In retrospect, it’s been kind of a week of mishaps around the Powers household.

My oldest up in North Dakota had the front end smashed on her car, and it’s going to be about $1800 to repair. And of course, she has a $1000 deductible she’s going to have to borrow from me because she’s not financially in a position to cover it. It will be borrowed in the sense that I’ll cover all of it, and she can eventually pay me back half.

At home, I snapped the interior door handle off of my truck. And had to fix it to the tune of about $300. My garage door opener went on the fritz.  So, if I want my garage door to open again, I’m going to have to bite the bullet and buy a new one.  Yesterday, I sent my daughter to the store with $20 to buy a battery. She slipped on the ice, but got back up to go get the $2 battery I needed…… Only to realize that she’d lost the $20.

All “first world” problems to have, aren’t they? It just doesn’t mean anything in the big scheme of things.

There are people out there who have those mishaps or worse happen, and they’re in serious trouble.  A sibling called today, and noted that his wife could be facing cervical cancer.  Kind of underlines the fact that my problems are not really problems.

What’s worth focusing on is that I get to enjoy almost all of my children home for Christmas, plus my dad, my sister, her daughter, and boyfriend, and my #2 daughter’s fiance’ sharing the holiday with us.  It has been filled with friends and family enjoying the Christmas holiday with each other, enjoying food, drink, and old-school trivial pursuits.

Family, friends, and the opportunity to share memories of the holiday together. That’s the only thing that really matters this holiday.

Senator Mike Rounds’ Weekly Column: News Year’s Resolutions for the Senate

RoundsPressHeader MikeRounds official SenateNews Year’s Resolutions for the Senate
By Senator Mike Rounds

As we ring in 2016, many South Dakotans will make New Year’s Resolutions for themselves. Oftentimes, these resolutions are self-improvement goals for the year ahead. As I began thinking about what lies ahead for the Senate in 2016, I started to think about New Year’s resolutions the Senate could adopt to help it operate more efficiently, so that we can better deliver on our promises to the American people. These suggestions, which we already do in South Dakota, are simple tactics to help suppress some of the Washington dysfunction that runs all too rampant.

While the list is undoubtedly long, two ideas in particular jump out: passing a budget and appropriation bills without waiting until the last minute–in Washington, they call this regular order–and operating under a senate calendar that will allow us to attend all our necessary committee hearings each week, as well as get our work done in a timely fashion.

For too long, Congress has failed to operate under regular order when it comes to the budget process. Reviving and staying committed to a normal budget process – in which all 12 appropriations bills are passed individually – is important for a number of reasons. Not only will it prevent us from having to rush another last-minute, thousands-page long omnibus bill through Congress just before the holidays, it will allow us to affect policy, which is what you sent me here to do in the first place. Crafting legislation behind closed doors is not an effective way to change policy provisions that previous congresses enacted. A regular budget process is also the best tool we have available to make certain the federal government is being a responsible steward of taxpayer dollars. This will help us rein in spending and address our bloated debt.

Earlier this month, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said that his top priority for 2016 is to pass all 12 appropriations bills through regular order, which hasn’t been done in more than 20 years. We made progress in 2015 by passing all 12 bills out of the Senate Appropriations Committee for the first time since 2009, and by passing one appropriations bill out of the Senate. But attempts to bring other appropriations bills to the floor were repeatedly blocked by Senate Democrats, who would prefer to maintain the status quo on spending and policy. This is a tactic we have pledged to reject in 2016.

Which brings me to my second resolution: operating under a calendar. Doing so will make certain our work gets done in a timely fashion. If the Senate had started considering appropriation bills in the spring and made considering them a priority, public pressure would have worked in our favor to get our work done and I believe we may have had some success in passing individual appropriation bills. If we set an appropriations calendar ahead of time, it would incentivize both parties to work together early on.

I would also prefer a set calendar for committee hearings so that they do not overlap with each other. This would allow us to attend all our hearings each week. I serve on four committees, and more times than not two or more of them schedule hearings for the same time. We shouldn’t have to pick and choose which hearings to prioritize as all our hearings are important. They allow us to ask questions and hear important testimony from expert witnesses about the issues before us.

As we look ahead to 2016, there are many policy issues that the Senate must address. Enacting a budget through regular order and operating under a predetermined calendar are two resolutions I believe could help the Senate operate more efficiently so we can make the best decisions for our country.

###

Secretary of State Shantel Krebs Certifies Second Ballot Measure

Secretary of State Shantel Krebs Certifies Second Ballot Measure

Today, Secretary of State Shantel Krebs announced that an Initiated Amendment to the South Dakota Constitution to Provide for State Legislative Redistricting by a Commission was validated and certified to be on the November 2016 general election ballot as a ballot measure that the citizens will vote on. The sponsor turned in 43,198 signatures to the Secretary of state’s office. An Initiated Amendment to the Constitution required a minimum of 27,741 signatures from South Dakota registered voters. Once the signatures were delivered to the Secretary of State’s office, a 5% random sampling was conducted. It was determined that 70.2% or 30,335 of 43,198 signatures were in good standing.

This is the second initiated measure to be approved by Secretary of State. A total of 8 measures were submitted for review. This office will continue the signature validation process of the remaining 6 measures in the order they were submitted to the Secretary of State. A total of 275,000 signatures were submitted among all petitions.

Those looking to challenge the Secretary of State’s certification of a ballot measure have 30 days from the date they are certified. To challenge the validation of to Provide for State Legislative Redistricting by a Commission that date would be January 25, 2016.

Challenges to all statewide initiatives and referendums must be brought within 30 days after the petition has been validated and filed by the Secretary of State (SDCL 12-1-13)

Pre-filed measures now appearing on-line at LRC website. Measures include County Sales Tax, and Locker room restrictions.

House and Senate bills have begun being pre-filed with the state’s legislative research council, and have now appeared on the LRC’s web site for review and dissection.

A few interesting ones are among the group, most notably House Bill 1006 – authorizing counties to impose sales and use taxes. Such an action would represent a sea change in how counties raise revenue, as they had been restricted from using sales tax proceeds in the past.

Fred Deutsch’s bill – House Bill 1008 – An act to restrict access to certain restrooms and locker rooms in public schools is sure to be one of the early and controversial measures, given the level of discussion the topic usually brings. The act is sponsored by Representatives Deutsch, Craig, Al Novstrup, Partridge, Russell, Schoenbeck, Verchio, and Zikmund and Senators Brock Greenfield, Haverly, Holien, Olson, and Ernie Otten.

If you think about the names on the list, this represents a fairly broad base among the ideological viewpoints of legislators. So it may carry far more weight than you might think.

The list of what’s been filed as of this writing is provided below. Click around, and let us know what you think.

House Bills

Bill Title
HB 1001 repeal the Midwestern Regional Higher Education Compact.
HB 1002 eliminate certain reporting requirements for the county general fund.
HB 1003 revise certain administrative functions regarding county government.
HB 1004 make form and style revisions to certain statutes regarding counties.
HB 1005 revise and repeal certain fees that are established to compensate counties for services provided by county officials.
HB 1006 authorize counties to impose sales and use taxes.
HB 1007 make an appropriation to revise and update the values and methods used to determine the agricultural land production capacity and to declare an emergency.
HB 1008 restrict access to certain restrooms and locker rooms in public schools.

Senate Bills

Bill Title
SB 1 revise certain provisions regarding the Executive Board of the Legislative Research Council.
SB 2 revise the distribution of the revenue from the alcoholic beverage fund.
SB 3 revise the income criteria for determining if property is classified as agricultural land for property tax purposes.
SB 4 provide for the assessment of certain agricultural land as noncropland.
SB 5 revise the procedure to initiate a school district boundary change.

Is Medicaid expansion going to be a far more difficult sell than people think?

There was an interesting comment in another post from State Representative Lee Schoenbeck, which could be a preview of one of the big legislative battles coming up next month in the State Legislative Session:

Lee Schoenbeck – December 23, 2015 at 3:53 pm

good discussion – I am concerned about what this Medicaid/Obamacare expansion will mean for both our state, and our party. If expanding the welfare rolls by adding 10% of our state’s population passes in an overwhelmingly GOP dominated legislature, there will be a lot of us asking: what’s the difference? And that will be a future challenge for the GOP in organizing and recruiting. 

I would really be surprised if it didn’t affect the enthusiasm of the people we ask to go out and organize and sell tickets to our large network of Lincoln Day Dinners.

Read that here.

Lee seems to think the Medicaid expansion represents a line in the sand for the soul of the GOP.  And let’s not forget about possible tax increases for education and county wants. 

Could the 2016 session be a battle royale on the GOP side of the aisle?

Butte County States Atty Heather Plunkett offers apology, initial statement on arrest & today’s proceedings

Butte County States Atty Heather Plunkett was kind enough to offer the following statement to dakotawarcollege.com this evening regarding her arrest, and today’s court proceedings:

Today I took responsibility for my actions in court but feel that I also owe the people of Butte County a formal apology as well as an expression of gratitude for the patience they have shown me in the last couple of weeks.  At a later date, I will issue a more in depth statement detailing my intentions concerning my position as State’s Attorney.  Additionally, I will be sentenced on February 5, 2015 at 1:30 pm and encourage the public to attend.

As noted in the immediately preceding post, Heather entered a plea of guilty today to possession of marijuana, less than 2 ounces, possession of drug paraphernalia, and ingesting substance other than alcohol. All were misdemeanor charges.

Belle Fourche Resident Pleads Guilty to Drug Charges *correction*

Belle Fourche Resident Pleads Guilty to Drug Charges

PIERRE, S.D.- Attorney General Marty Jackley announced that Heather Plunkett, 31, Belle Fourche entered a plea of guilty today to one count each of the following: possession of marijuana, less than 2 ounces, class 1 misdemeanor, possession of drug paraphernalia, class one misdemeanor and ingesting substance other than alcohol, class one misdemeanor.

Sentencing is scheduled for February 5, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. (MST) at the Butte County Courthouse.

(Note: Original release from the AG’s office had both persons pleading guilty today. Ryan Plunkett did not plead today. He had previously pled to the possession of marijuana charge and received a suspended jail sentence.)