One of the legislative measures that have already proven to be controversial before it was finished has now been put in the hopper and given a number. House Bill 1067, as primed by State Representative Tim Rounds, represents the latest draft of the legislation as supported by Sanford Health Plans, who believes in a different interpretation than the one in State Law as passed by 2014’s Initiated Measure 17, otherwise known as the “Any willing Provider” act.
What are the differences between the draft measure we pointed out yesterday, and the one that was filed today?
The draft dated 1/7/2016 is titled “An Act to allow health care providers to offer plans that contain less than all of the health care providers on a panel of providers.”
House Bill 1067’s title is “An Act to promote quality, competition, and freedom of choice in the health insurance market place.”
Well… it’s a shinier title. But, with the exception of the new title, it would appear to be the same bill as circulated around previously.
The bill’s complete sponsor list is as noted:
Representatives Rounds, Beal, Conzet, Cronin, Dryden, Hawks, Hawley, Jensen (Alex), Otten (Herman), Partridge, Peterson (Kent), and Willadsen and Senators Peters, Buhl O’Donnell, Haverly, Rusch, Shorma, Solano, Sutton, and Tidemann.
Residency for the sponsors is heavily weighted in South Dakota’s urban areas, and politically, most, if not all, aren’t going to face tough competition at election time. No one is going to beat Tim Rounds or Deb Peters, or Arch Beal, or Larry Tidemann, etc. Or, like Alex Jensen, and Angie Buhl, they’re sitting out the next election.
Although it was very interesting to see that State Representative Paula Hawks who is running for Congress has signed on as a sponsor to what may be one of the legislative session’s most controversial bills. Her sponsorship is a wild card in all of this, given her high profile race for office in 2016.
Stay tuned. The wild ride of the 2016 legislative session is just starting.