Truth in Corrections
by Sen. Brent “B.R.” Hoffman
In the public eye, there’s a widespread belief that conservative Republicans hold a narrow, draconian viewpoint on law and order. No doubt, most conservatives support serious consequences for serious crimes, but that doesn’t mean we support tired adages like “Lock ‘em up and throw away the key.” Conservatives, by and large, also believe in second chances and redemption.
Since about 95% of all state prisoners will eventually be released, it’s essential to help prepare inmates to successfully reenter society. Unfortunately, as it stands, there’s not much opportunity for training, education or other programming in our state prisons, largely due to staffing shortages and safety concerns. Though the largest portion of the prison population is incarcerated for drug use and possession, only about one-third are engaged in substance abuse treatment. An operational review of our prisons also noted vocational training attendance is “low or non-existent.” Lockdowns are common and inmates can quickly lose sight of a pathway to redemption.
Given that environment, it comes as no surprise that over 40% of inmates return to prison within three years of release, ranking our state’s recidivism rate 33rd among the 50 states. Too frequently, individuals who have completed their sentences find themselves without skills, tools or encouragement, ensnared in a vicious cycle and further straining communities and the criminal justice system. In the end, as always, the citizens bear the cost, and not just in the form of crime rates. It costs taxpayers an average of $28,749 to incarcerate a single adult offender for one year.
Like a lot of problems in government, there are no quick, easy solutions, but there are some first steps we can take together. Sure, we should stabilize staffing levels and build new, modern prisons, but there are also programs that can have a systemic, lasting effect at little cost. A small group of legislators, law enforcement and inmates have been working on a three-year pilot proposal aimed at enhancing prison reentry initiatives and programming. This proposal, aptly named “Truth in Corrections,” draws on a model program in Oklahoma that reduced recidivism rates by 21%. It provides state nondriver identification cards and other documentation and services to help inmates transition into a job market that is in desperate need of workers. Furthermore, the bill expands programming opportunities and encourages the use of volunteer and faith-based services, many of which are readily available at no cost to taxpayers.
Our working group believes we should invest in the future of our communities by supporting the rehabilitation and reintegration of formerly incarcerated individuals. In the coming weeks, we anticipate refining and releasing the draft language for this bill, titled, “An Act to Enhance Prison Reentry Initiatives and Programming.” We humbly request your support and welcome your suggestions to provide this pathway to redemption. Together, we can build safer communities and lessen the financial burden on all of us.
The author served a career in the military, surviving the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon. He’s a published author, occasional newspaper columnist and currently serves as a state senator for District 9 in glorious South Dakota.
It’s ironic Hoffman would propose this since he’s the one who passed the law locking people up longer. He has a formidable reputation and is well liked but this proposal doesn’t have a chance in this state. He’s spending too much time on lost causes like term limits.
His bill requires violent criminals to spend a longer portion of the sentence in prison.
That means that judges, when calculating a sentence, will tend to give shorter sentences overall, because they generally target a certain amount of time in prison and back into the overall length.
The effect of Hoffman’s bill from last year is that violent criminals will spend less time on parole, which has the exact opposite effect that he is now trying to do.
Opponents to his bill explained this, including former judges, lawyers, and Rep. Tim Reisch who is a former secretary of the Department of Corrections.
But the “sounds good” bill won out over the reality and now, a year later, I guess Hoffman is trying to repair the damage.
Anonymous is is probably a lawyer, you’d think he’d understand the law better. If you listen to the opponent testimony including Riesch, it’s obvious they didn’t understand basic law enforcement, which is why we and many, many others throughout the state strongly supported the bill. Our attorney and mayor also supported it. I think you can be for stronger sentencing for violent criminals while still encouraging people to seek rehabilitation and prepare for a job when they get out but I haven’t seen this new bill.
I enjoy the manufactured narrative of why we need to spend $400M on a new prison. We get “news” reports every time an officer is “assaulted” in the penitentiary over the past year, but they are careful not to show how it is bad for the prisoners. They also leave out how many of the tasks could be completed by machines / AI instead of the 100+ year old idea of having a guard do it which is why they are susceptible to assaults. There is more behind this “need” for a new prison, and I hope someone finds out and reports back.