I don’t think Shad Olson’s on-line anger management course worked.

@SoDakCampaigns

I seem to remember several weeks back when Shad Olson completed an on-line anger management course to keep himself out of jail after a warrant was issued for his not appearing to comply with the terms of his sentence. If you recall the whole pleading no contest for domestic abuse thing:

According to Katie Hoffman posting on the Patriot Papers facebook website today,  I get the impression that Shad’s on-line course he took on “Anger Management: Mastering Emotional Balance” might not have left him with adequate anger management tools:

Go read the entire post here.

I know Katie and I probably don’t agree on a great many topics, but I would venture that there’s a meeting of the minds over Shad insinuating he’s ready to shoot someone. And claiming an ‘alleged’ accuracy with a rifle in conjunction with it is a little beyond the pale.   Not sure that claiming that he’ll shoot people in a driveway shows a depth of knowledge about how South Dakota’s Stand Your Ground laws work either.

I also seem to remember that when most people are sentenced for a crime, isn’t the typical thing that most judges tack on to the sentence a line about being a law-abiding citizen?

This might be bumping up against it.

16 thoughts on “I don’t think Shad Olson’s on-line anger management course worked.”

  3. This is an epic post. I owe shad thanks for helping us divided republicans find common ground through his antics at us🤣

  4. Shameful but not surprising. One person, Ed Walter, actually liked his FU comment. His profile contains these words “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God”. Not sure I’m picking up on the Godly part.

    1. Thank you for the Honorable mention!

      Message me for more Scripture quotes if you are so inclined A-non.

  6. Did someone substitute Anger Escalation course vs Anger Management?

    Is this an ACME Anger Management Online Course?

    I am surprised he is still allowed have firearms.

  7. What might be most concerning is that he came back 44 minutes after the initial post to make the 1,800 yards comment. So even after almost an hour, he was still mad enough to come back and make that comment. Also, 100% calling complete BS on him being accurate out to 1800 yards.

      1. grudznick grows a bit afeared for Ms. Brandei’s safe yet insaner existence. My close personal friend Lar, and other friend Bill, reached out about it as well. So now many are a bit afeared.

  9. wow. And I got kicked off facebook for sharing the results of a New York Times puzzle! (I’ve got a screen shot to prove it.)
    they said it violated their standards on violence and incitement.
    They also didn’t like it when I posted free igloo-style dog houses at the end of my driveway.

  10. Maybe it’s worth having a LEO check out where Shads shacking up. Doesn’t he know you can’t have a firearm if you’ve got a DV on record? Crying shame if he went to the pen for a few years.

Comments are closed.