Rep. Jon Hansen launches “October surprise” attack to nuke prison reset. Because we need to kick the can down the road and cost taxpayers more?
The Dakota Scout has a story this evening describing detailing a night-before attack that 2% gubernatorial wannabe Rep. Jon Hansen is making against Governor Larry Rhoden’s prison reset that will be heard in special session tomorrow as everyone comes to Pierre to try to move forward on one of the largest building projects in South Dakota state government history:
South Dakota’s Speaker of the House says he will not support a proposal for a new prison after discovering the Department of Corrections is paying a gender dysphoria consultant to assess if state inmates are transgender.
But Gov. Larry Rhoden says while he agrees with his potential rival in the 2026 GOP primary race, his hands are tied until the federal courts make a ruling on a Trump-order ban on correctional inmates transitioning to genders not aligned with their legal sex while in custody.
and..
“The State has never paid for transgender surgeries, and I don’t think we should ever spend a dime on these types of treatments,” he (Governor Rhoden) said, also referencing aggressive outreach his office has been conducting with lawmakers ahead of the special session. “We have been talking directly to candidate Hansen for more than than two weeks and are answering his questions, and I appreciate Hansen’s support for my position.”
Read the entire story here at Dakota Scout.
So, Hansen has known for weeks that the state is stuck paying for this kind of consultant until a ruling by federal courts.. yet waits until the day before the special session in a very public self-serving “October Surprise” in an attempt to drop a figurative nuclear bomb on the prison reset project that everyone – including himself – have been working on for months? Sorry, but it’s just underlining why he has no business being in elective office.
Because instead of looking towards how to best serve the citizens of South Dakota, or, acting in a palms-up manner, he intentionally uses something he’s known for weeks to launch a fairly slimy sneak attack where everyone had been working together in good faith.
At least, everyone but Hansen.
The state’s corrections system had been stuck paying for something they didn’t want to until a court makes a decision? Well, welcome to governing where sometimes the best you can do is to pick the least worst of bad options, until you can find a better solution. Which according to what I read was what the state was doing.
The big question is how far Hansen thinks we need to kick the can down the road, so we can cost taxpayers even more? Because if that’s what happens, he should be proud of what he has accomplished. Because he can take the blame for every cent more of taxpayer funds that the project will cost.






