Guest Column: It’s Time to Defund the Propaganda and Empower South Dakota By Dan Schneider, Media Research Center (MRC)

It’s Time to Defund the Propaganda and Empower South Dakota
By Dan Schneider, Media Research Center (MRC)
For decades, the Media Research Center has been on the front lines, exposing the pervasive and insidious bias that saturates our national media. Among the most biased of news outlets are NPR and PBS. The taxpayer-funded propaganda they produce is a clear and present danger to the common-sense policies that benefit all Americans, and to leaders like Senator Mike Rounds, who champion pro-growth policies for their constituents.
That’s why it is critical for Rounds to vote in favor of H.R. 4, President Donald Trump’s request to rescind the $1.1 billion that Joe Biden secured for NPR and PBS over the next two years.
If you examine Rounds’s priorities, you’ll see how NPR and PBS consistently work against his agenda while simultaneously lining their own pockets with taxes from South Dakotas. To add insult to injury, these broadcasters also attack the jobs of the very people who are forced to subsidize “public broadcasting.”
If your income is connected to production agriculture, transportation, or oil and gas development, or if you hold traditional values or believe in the Second Amendment, why should you be forced to turn over your taxes to those who seek your demise?
Rounds has consistently fought for agriculture and rural economic vitality, the beating heart of South Dakota’s economy. His support for crucial initiatives such as the USA Beef Act and Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling (M-COOL), his efforts to crack down on anti-competitive practices, and his proactive emergency plans for bird flu outbreaks all demonstrate a commitment to the state’s foundational industry. Rounds has also made tribal communities a priority, pushing for better transportation funding and a much-needed tribal law enforcement training center.
Yet NPR churns out stories at odds with these priorities.They obsess over the environmental “sins” of the beef industry with endless talk of carbon and methane and cast the USA Beef Act as some backward, industry-pandering move. PBS NewsHour is no better, often complaining that M-COOL might “ruffle feathers” in global trade deals or “jack up prices” for consumers. They conveniently gloss over the tangible benefits these policies bring to rural and tribal communities, framing these common-sense priorities as mere trifles compared to their globalist, green dogma. It’s a classic media dodge: undermine the heartland to push their progressive pet projects.
These left-wing news outlets also strike directly at one of Round’s legislative priorities, ending Federal control over our children’s education. Rounds’ legislation “Returning Education to Our States Act,” would dismantle the bloated U.S. Department of Education and hand decision-making power back to states via block grants, a concept that, to most South Dakotans, is simply common sense.
But NPR and PBS trot out union bosses and so-called “experts” to cry about “equity” and “access,” as if states can’t be trusted to run their own schools. NPR’s biased stories invariably focus on how federal cuts might “hurt underserved kids,” conveniently ignoring how federal red tape often stifles genuine innovation. PBS NewsHour plays the same game, framing the proposal as a dangerous gamble that could “undo” decades of progress. Of course, both outlets fail to show that the so-called “progress” is actually ever-declining performance by students across America.
The continued subsidization of NPR and PBS, to the tune of more than half-a-billion dollars annually, is an undeniable anachronism in today’s media environment. Their tired arguments for taxpayer dollars are as hollow as the “news” coverage they provide. They claim farmers need them for weather reports? This is an insult to the ingenuity and technological savvy of South Dakota’s agricultural community, who are already equipped with cell phones, computers, and sophisticated weather apps that provide real-time, localized data far more efficiently.
They perpetuate the myth of unique emergency alert services, despite the undeniable fact that every broadcaster in America is legally mandated to provide the same alerts. Furthermore, with 98% of Americans now owning cell phones, these critical notifications are delivered directly to nearly every pocket, rendering traditional broadcast-dependent systems largely obsolete. Importantly, H.R. 4 does not touch the Integrated Public Alert & Warning System (IPAWS), which is instead funded by FEMA.
Rounds is laser-focused on keeping America strong by modernizing our military and integrating AI to our national defense systems. Yet, NPR and PBS wring their hands over the “ethics” of AI in defense, while PBS trots out talking heads who seem to prefer playing nice with China rather than building up our defenses. They paint the push for military readiness as reckless saber-rattling, willfully ignoring the very real threats we face in a complex world. PBS and NPR bias represents a deliberate attempt to kneecap leaders who prioritize strength over feelings.
The evidence is clear: NPR and PBS are not providing a unique, unbiased public service that justifies billions in taxpayer subsidies. Instead, they are actively undermining the very policies that directly benefit the hardworking people of South Dakota. It’s time to cut off the flow of taxpayer dollars to these purveyors of partisan narratives.
Rounds should stand with South Dakota’s farmers, ranchers, and taxpayers and vote to defund NPR and PBS.
—
Dan Schneider is Vice President of the Media Research Center.








