From today’s $hopping Guide covering rural Minnehaha County, it looks like there’s a lot of confusing information out there about Tom Pischke:
(Aside from the fact there is no disclaimer in violation of state law) the shopper paper ad says elect him to State Senate.. but the sample ballot says elect him to State Representative?
There’s also that family values statement, but that’s an argument for the campaign trail.
I hope the former Mrs. Pischke is involved in the campaigns. And I doubt friend of Mr. H’s out-of-state name-caller blog, Mr. Barth, is really appearing on the ballot in June alongside Mr. Pischke.
I am not on the ballot for anything this year! Clearly a cut and paste error from two years ago. I recognize the family photo.
Has anyone noticed this ballot would be one for the General election in November? Why is this printed before the Primary?
Mr. Eldon, grudznick noticed. That’s why I pointed out Mr. Barth being on a “primary” ballot with Mr. Pischke. It’s a picture that makes no sense. Why did he not take a real sample ballot and color the dot and then put that in his ad? I’ll tell you why. It’s Mr. Pischke, who is very confused.
There sure do seem to be a lot of typos this year.
What a blow-hard. Guys like him give the SD Legislature a bad name. Please vote him out District 25!
Random question: What is the governing body campaign violations like this are reported to and is there any viable punishment they can impose?
Doesn’t the ad have to mention that it is “paid for by…” or am I missing something? As far as the “family values” go, it’s nice he’s actually married to the chick he’s been pretending to be married to in every previous election. Pathetic.
I wonder, if he devoted his time to a career, instead of running for office, if he would make enough money to support all those kids. What does he do for a living, anyway? All we ever hear is how he can’t afford to pay child support.