Pro-Bosworth supporters calling potential sentence unusual. But, it really isn’t, and won’t be 20 years in Prison.

In recent writings, some of Annette Bosworth’s supporters are calling the potential sentence that Bosworth is facing unusually harsh. But, in a review of a similar case involving the mishandling of petitions, those defendants faced over 20 years in prison, but that’s not what they got.

The South Bend Tribune, which inspired the case against Morgan, Blythe and two other defendants with a 2012 investigation of election fraud in the 2nd Congressional District, says Morgan is looking at a possible 22 years in prison, while Blythe could face 75 years. The two co-defendants, who pleaded guilty to felony counts, are facing 11 and 14 years.

Read that here.  Just as in the Bosworth case, people were facing over 20 years in a state penitentiary. But when the sentence was read, realistically, things were taken in proportion.

In court, former longtime St. Joseph County Democratic Chairman Butch Morgan, Jr. was sentenced to one year behind bars, and is expected to serve half that, as well as Community Corrections and probation. Former St. Joseph County Board of Elections worker and Democratic volunteer Dustin Blythe received a sentence of one year in Community Corrections and probation, which means no jail time.

In April, a jury convicted Morgan and Blythe on numerous felony conspiracy counts to commit petition fraud and felony forgery counts.

Former St. Joseph County Board of Voter Registration Democratic board member Pam Brunette and Board of Voter Registration worker Beverly Shelton previously pleaded guilty and testified for prosecutors against Morgan and Blythe. They both received two years of probation.

“When you do something like this, we are going to find out and you’re going to be held accountable,” declared Levco. He called the sentences “appropriate.”

Others disagreed.

“We would like to have seen more jail time for Morgan … but it was more than we were expecting,” said St. Joseph County Republican Party Executive Director Jake Teshka. He thinks the three other defendants “got off easy.”

Read it here.

(Given she’s readily admitted the behavior she’s charged with – attesting she witnessed signatures she didn’t witness) If convicted, what do you think her sentence will be?

I’m guessing a year in state prison, and as in this case, part, but not all, will be suspended. Your thoughts?

Person who wrote article in January about Bosworth’s innocence now going to hold press conference on same.

From my inbox, right after I got an offer to replace my roof for less:

National Petition Expert to Release Report On Prosecution of Dr. Annette Bosworth

Report to be delivered to Governor, Attorney General

(Pierre, SD) … A recognized national petition expert will issue an 18-page report on the felony prosecution of Dr. Annette Bosworth by South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley at a news conference tomorrow at 10:00 am at Main Public Library in downtown Sioux Falls.

“This prosecution of Dr. Bosworth carries the toughest potential penalty of any petition case anywhere in the nation and throughout this nation’s history,“ said Paul Jacob, president of Citizens in Charge Foundation, a national organization dedicated to protecting and expanding initiative petition rights. “The impact of the case on those considering getting involved in politics in South Dakota cannot be ignored.”

When: 10:00 am, Tuesday, May 5
Where: Meeting Room B, Main Downtown Library, 200 North Dakota Avenue, Sioux Falls, SD 57117
The report examines the facts of the case charging Bosworth with 12 felony counts, with a maximum punishment of 24 years in prison, if convicted, and as much as $48,000 in fines. The report also compares the Bosworth case with other cases of alleged petition misconduct.

This comes from Paul Jacobs who previously wrote an article on the topic, using Gordon Howie who claimed “everybody does it” and former S&M Pornographer Lee Stranahan who has been paid by Bosworth for various work as sources.  In the article, it went into detail showing she violated the law, but supposedly she’s not supposed to be prosecuted?  Oy.

So, we had robocalls, and now more press conferences.

Just keep telling yourselves – 3 more weeks, and the circus will be over!

Carly Fiorina announces for President. Is there something specific that she’s bringing to the table that I’m missing?

CEKoQydWEAEOtE5

And…. is there something specific that she’s bringing to the table that I’m missing? I’m have no idea what her raison d’être is for running.

Anyone out there in the SD Blogosphere care that Carly Fiorina has now announced for President?

(She did do a Demon Sheep ad when she was running for US Senate.)

US Senator John Thune’s Weekly Column: New Prescribed Burn Policies Would Ensure Collaboration

New Prescribed Burn Policies Would Ensure Collaboration

By Senator John Thune

 

One of the most satisfying aspects of my job in the Senate is working to help South Dakotans cut through the bureaucratic red tape of the federal government. I know it is often frustrating for constituents to weave through the maze of federal agencies and programs that have become far too large and no longer serve people as intended. Far too often, federal agencies act alone rather than coordinating with state and local governments, resulting in the right hand not knowing what the left hand is doing.


The lack of common-sense collaboration between federal agencies and other levels of government is often frustrating, and can result in reckless actions by federal officials placing lives and property at risk. One recent example of this type of reckless action was the out-of-control prescribed burn, known as the Cold Brook Fire, at Wind Cave National Park. On April 13, the National Park Service (NPS) initiated a prescribed burn of an intended 1,100 acres, which burned out-of-control consuming 6,500 acres in Wind Cave National Park.


This is not the first time federal agencies have disregarded imminent fire danger, putting lives, land, and property at risk. It was just over two years ago that the Forest Service (FS) started a prescribed burn in northwest South Dakota, known as the Pautre Fire, which resulted in extensive property losses. Landowners impacted by the Pautre Fire still have not been reimbursed by the Fire Service, nor has the Fire Service accepted liability more than two years after the fire occurred. 


The fires started by the NPS and FS are prime examples of federal agencies taking questionable actions without first collaborating with adjacent landowners and local and state officials. To better prevent future out-of-control burns and to ensure the agencies responsible assume liability for the damage caused by these fires, I introduced the Prescribed Burn Approval Act of 2015.  


My bill would prevent federal agencies from starting future prescribed burns on federal lands without first collaborating with state government and local fire officials. My bill would also require that when a prescribed fire burns out-of-control, that the federal agency responsible accepts liability for resulting expenses and damage to private property. Finally, my bill stipulates that damages are to be paid within 120 days of receipt of a substantiated claim.

As a member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, I will continue working with my colleagues to hold our federal agencies accountable, make common-sense changes to our federal prescribed burn policies, and do my best to ensure that Washington’s right hand finally starts working with its left.

 

###

Senator Mike Rounds’ Weekly Column: The Water Quality Protection Act

The Water Quality Protection Act

By Senator Mike Rounds

May 1, 2015

 

In 2014, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers proposed a rule to expand the definition of ‘waters of the U.S.’ This power grab would dramatically expand the federal government’s jurisdiction under the Clean Air Act, beyond what the Act intended. The proposed rule, commonly known as WOTUS, has the potential to be one of the most burdensome and overreaching regulations in history for South Dakota’s farmers and ranchers by requiring onerous and unnecessary new permits.

 

I’ve heard from a number of South Dakota farmers and ranchers, who continue to tell me the WOTUS rule would bog down productivity. Our Ag producers should be focused on growing crops and caring for their herds, not wasting time filling out paperwork or waiting around to get a permit to spray weeds in their ditches.  In the Senate, I recently joined my colleagues in a bipartisan effort to prevent WOTUS from taking effect.

 

Our bill, the Federal Water Quality Protection Act, would protect traditional, navigable waters as well as the livelihood of farmers and ranchers by requiring EPA and the Army Corps to completely abandon their current WOTUS rule. Instead, it directs the administration to go back to the drawing board, following principles and procedures we set forth in our bill.

 

We clarify that the definition of ‘waters of the U.S.’ does not include things such as groundwater, sheet flow, agricultural water and temporary ponds formed from rainwater, floodwater and wastewater because they do not have a connection to navigable waters. We also recommend grandfathering systems that may have been created by converting a stream into a water management system before the Clean Water Act was enacted. These commonsense ideas help set clear limits on the federal regulation of water. 

 

Farmers and ranchers know their land better than anyone. Often times, it is handed down for generations. They make their living from the land, and have a vested interest in preserving and protecting it for their children and grandchildren. As such, they are inherently good stewards of the land. They deserve a voice in any rule that would dramatically affect the way their property is regulated and managed by the federal government. Our bill would also require EPA and the Army Corps to work with the Ag community and state and local governments when determining which water features should be under federal jurisdiction and which should be left to local governments. 

 

Freeing Americans from burdensome regulations such as WOTUS has been a priority of mine since taking office. Our Federal Water Quality Protection Act would stop this unnecessary, burdensome and intrusive rule from getting in the way of our farmers and ranchers. It is another step toward reducing regulatory burden being handed down by unelected bureaucrats in Washington. I look forward to continuing to work with my colleagues in the Senate to get this bill to the President’s desk before a final rule is published. 

 

###

Congresswoman Kristi Noem’s Weekly Column: Building On Early Successes

Building On Early Successes

By Rep. Kristi Noem

May 1, 2015

 

It’s hard to believe we’ve already passed the 100 day mark of this Congress. The new Senate Republican majority has provided us a valuable opportunity to work together to get the country on the right track, and my assignment to the Ways & Means Committee has put me in prime position to help South Dakota.

 

The goal of the new Republican majority in Congress has been to work across the aisle to move common sense measures that increase freedom, promote opportunity, and make our government accountable. To that end, we’ve made solid progress so far this year.

 

In the House, we’ve passed a budget which balances without any new tax increases. While our budget cuts spending, we continue to focus on areas where the federal government has legitimate responsibility, like defense. In areas where control rightfully belongs in the hands of states or local communities, we introduce new limits on the federal government and even repeal programs it has no business managing. Rather than increasing your taxes, this budget begins to lay the groundwork for a fairer and simpler tax code that could lower your annual tax bill.

 

We’ve also passed bipartisan legislation that’s been signed into law that protects and strengthens Medicare by stopping dramatic cuts to doctors who care for Medicare patients.  This so-called “Medicare doc fix” also contained reforms that save taxpayers money and put our nation’s budget on a more secure footing. I am proud that this law also extends the Children’s Health Insurance Program, which serves more than 8 million children and expecting mothers, giving new parents the certainty they need to plan their family budgets and doctor visits in advance.

 

The House has also taken steps to protect the most vulnerable among us. The bipartisan Human Trafficking Prevention, Intervention, and Recovery Act, a bill I first introduced last year, was passed by the House. This bill will give caregivers, state law enforcement officers, and others the tools they need to prevent trafficking in our communities.  The Senate has recently also passed this bill and I’m hopeful we will be able to get it signed into law soon. 

 

Additionally, we’ve taken action to improve the lives of our nation’s veterans by passing the Clay Hunt Suicide Prevention Act. It provides resources to those who stood up to serve and defend our country. I am glad to report this legislation was signed into law. Additionally, the House passed the Hire More Heroes Act, which aims to provide more economic opportunity for veterans by exempting them from Obamacare’s employer mandate.

 

We’ve also seized the unprecedented opportunity we have – due to the recent North American energy revolution – to break our reliance on overseas oil, which has for so long left us vulnerable.  One of the first items of business this year was passing and sending to the president’s desk the Keystone XL Pipeline Approval Act. The president unfortunately vetoed this legislation, though we are not giving up on the effort to get this common sense pipeline approved. 

 

Simplification of the tax code is another area where there is overwhelming bipartisan agreement. Farmers, ranchers and small business owners in South Dakota are often disproportionately impacted by bad tax policy. I am proud that the House passed a repeal of the death tax, as I have experienced firsthand how this can affect a farm or business when a family is hurting most. 

 

As a lifelong farmer and rancher, I also understand the importance of reasonable deduction levels for new equipment and have heard repeatedly from producers and business owners across the state who are looking for more certainty with how the federal tax code treats these types of investments. In response, earlier this year the House passed legislation that would permanently increase what is known as Section 179 expensing to provide more certainty for our agriculture producers and small businesses.   

 

Hardworking taxpayers deserve a more efficient, effective, and accountable federal government. We have made some progress so far this year in delivering this goal but there is much that remains to be done. As your voice in the U.S. House, you have my word that I will work hard on your behalf to build on these early accomplishments and continue promoting common sense solutions to the challenges our country faces.  

 

###

Governor Daugaard’s Weekly Column: A Message To The Graduating Classes Of 2015

A Message To The Graduating Classes Of 2015

 

A column by Gov. Dennis Daugaard:

 

Congratulations to the class of 2015! To all high school, college and technical school students now approaching graduation in South Dakota, I commend you for reaching this milestone. After years of studying, taking tests and writing essays, you’ve finally made it. Congratulations on all you have achieved!

 

Most of you probably already have a good idea of what you’ll be doing next – what additional education you’ll seek or what career you’ll pursue. Whether you’ve decided to stay in South Dakota or pursue a career or education elsewhere, I hope you’ll ultimately consider a future here in our state. There are a number of reasons to consider living and working here.

 

First, we have the fourth lowest unemployment rate in the nation at 3.5 percent, compared to the national rate of 5.5 percent. Job opportunities are better here than in most places.

 

Secondly, the tax burden in South Dakota is low. We are among only a few states without an income tax, meaning you can keep more of the money you earn. Money that can repay student debt, buy a house someday or replace that car you drove into the ground in school.

 

Third, not only do people keep more of the money they earn in South Dakota, but that money will buy more here than in other places. According to a U.S. Department of Commerce report, South Dakotans experience a very low cost of living in the United States. We don’t spend as much money on housing, insurance, food and the other everyday needs. In fact, we have some of the lowest costs in the nation.  In New York, California, Washington, D.C., or many other places, you will find costs that are 10 percent, 12 percent, even 18 percent higher than the national average.  In South Dakota those costs are only 88 percent of the national average.

 

Now some people will say, “There may a low tax burden and low cost of living, but I won’t get paid as much if I live in South Dakota.” Actually, when it comes to per capita personal income, we fare pretty well. Nationally, we rank in the top half. And, if you adjust the per capita personal income for the low cost of living, we are the fifthbest in the nation. If you adjust for lack of income taxes, we rank third in the nation.

 

Beyond the financial reasons, though, South Dakota is a great place to live because we have a good quality of life here. Our communities are safe, our public schools are high-quality and our people are friendly. We also have clean air, clean water and beautiful scenery.  And you can’t put a price tag on the love and support of your family, here in South Dakota.

 

My hope is not that you will never venture outside of our state, but rather that you would consider a more permanent future in South Dakota. Your dreams can come true – right here at home.

 

 

-30-

On my way back to SD…

“Sorry for the light posting,” as I wind my way back to South Dakota.

This was originally going to be a busy weekend writing on the SDCR convention featuring Michelle Maklin. Plus the Avengers movie and Free Comic Book Day for the kids.

Instead, I was in Arkansas cleaning out my in-laws house, and helping my wife de-clutter for the Realtor, and somewhat prepare it for a personal property sale.  Granted, I’m coming out of it with a truckload of “stuff,” but I suspect it’s going to be taking more of my summer.

Plus, I have three cats to find homes for.

Noem Succeeds in Making Additional Resources Available to Lewis & Clark Project in House-Passed Bill

Noem Succeeds in Making Additional Resources Available to Lewis & Clark Project in House-Passed Bill

Washington, D.C. – U.S. Congresswoman Kristi Noem today announced she has successfully led an effort to make additional resources available for rural water projects in the Fiscal Year 2016 Energy and Water appropriations bill without increasing total spending in the bill. The legislation, which passed the House today, would allocate a total of $28.75 million to a rural water project fund that the Lewis and Clark Regional Water System is eligible to draw from. Total funding in the Energy and Water appropriations bill as brought to the floor for debate was $633 million below the president’s funding request.

“It is imperative that the federal government meets the promises it has made to rural areas while still protecting hardworking taxpayers, and this bill helps accomplish that,” said Rep. Noem. “Our local communities have put in more than their share of the funding for Lewis and Clark, but the federal government has not kept its commitment. By not living up to its end of the deal, the federal government is costing taxpayers more money in the long run due to inflation and inaction on projects like Lewis & Clark. The bill passed today includes funding for a rural water account I previously was able to create which could help fund Lewis & Clark at a higher level than the president requested while also not increasing the bill’s overall spending.”

Troy Larson, executive director of the Lewis and Clark Regional Water System said, “It is terribly frustrating that the administration refuses to make rural water construction a priority in its annual budget. Thankfully the House today added another $28.75 million to the Bureau of Reclamation’s Rural Water Program, bringing the proposed total for the FY16 Budget to $47.3 million and matching last year’s total. We still have a long way to go to get overall funding for rural water construction to where it needs to be, but this is a huge improvement over the President’s proposal. We cannot thank Congresswoman Noem and the rest of the tri-state congressional delegation enough for once again going to bat for this critically needed water project. We greatly appreciate the strong support and leadership that she and the rest of the delegation continue to provide.”

The Fiscal Year 2016 Energy and Water appropriations bill specifically allocates $2.774 million in support of the Lewis and Clark project. Additionally, Rep. Noem led an effort with eight other Members to increase overall rural water funding, making an additional $28.75 million available to projects like Lewis and Clark. This brings overall funding for rural water projects to a level equal to what they received last year.

The rural water projects fund was originally created in 2013 as the result of an amendment offered by Rep. Noem to the FY2014 Energy and Water appropriations bill. Lewis and Clark received $5.2 million from that account in addition to the funding specifically allocated to the project in the bill. Rep Noem again offered an amendment in 2014 to the FY2015 Energy and Water appropriations bill, which resulted in an additional $31 million for rural water. Lewis and Clark received $6.6 million from that account in addition to the funding they were originally allocated for the project.
###