Yes, the ‘non-political party’ political party created to elect a US President in 2012 by bypassing the Republican and Democrat parties was called Americans Elect. But it was made up of the same Republican and Democrat operatives and donors that have, and continue to, corrupt America in the first place, including the Rothschild family. Read the 2012 Whiteout Press article ‘Americans Elect closing in on a Presidential Nominee’ for more information.
Read that all here.
So, it’s many of the same people who tried to sell us on the Nathan Daschle led “Americans Elect” experiment, which went down in flames?
According to CitizenAudit.org, Major funders for the Represent US Education fund include The New York Community Trust, and Sandler Foundation.
Take note of the Sandler foundation, as they provide significant funding for many of your favorite organizations. According to Wikipedia:
A 2008 New York Times article notes that the foundation has provided substantial support to several nonprofit organizations, including ProPublica, the Center for American Progress, the Center for Responsible Lending, Human Rights Watch, the American Civil Liberties Union, as well as other nonprofit organizations.
Read that here.
And yes, this is the same Sandler Foundation who is funding the people backing another ultra-liberal ballot measure, the Hickey/Hildebrand 36% cap payday lending measure, which I also recently wrote about.
But, let’s not stop here.
The director of Represent Us is Josh Silver, who had previously championed public financing of elections in Arizona. This past September Silver wrote a very revealing piece in the Huffington Post of how he now “bundles” public funding of elections into a package in order to make them more palatable to voters:
But don’t give up just yet. Contrary to popular belief, the money-in-politics problem can be fixed by emulating the stunning successes of marriage equality and marijuana decriminalization over the past twenty years. Here’s how to do it.
First, we need to take the fight to local communities, by passing city and statewide reform initiatives. For too long, reformers have advocated small-step, incremental reforms at the federal level, such as ending secret donations. This is a good and popular proposal, but alone will not come close to fixing the problem. Other reformers are advocating “publicly funded” elections, which is also good policy, but remains unpopular with many voters and would not fix the entire problem if passed without simultaneous ethics, lobbying and transparency reforms.
And here’s the key thing: comprehensive reform proposals that overhaul ethics, lobbying, transparency and provide public funding in one fell swoop enjoy over 80% voter approval, and they are constitutional, even under the current Supreme Court. Together they are much more popular than public funding alone, and far more palatable to moderates and conservatives to boot.
Read that here.
Hmmm…. Where have we heard about a bundle of reforms on “ethics, lobbying, transparency and provide public funding in one fell swoop?” Yes, that is exactly what Slick Rick Weiland’s ballot measure is to the letter. Public Campaign financing bundled, just like your cable TV, into a package with other things in order to get you to buy it.
In a nutshell, “The South Dakotans for Ethics Reform” is a misleading description, because the associated ballot measure is yet another in a long line of out-of-state interests trying to get a ballot measure passed in South Dakota because we’re the – if not one of the – easiest and cheapest states to put a measure on the ballot.
They’ve packaged it up, and handed it off to Slick Rick, with over $228,000 – which I’m sure is the first installment – to promote this out of state measure in South Dakota.
“South Dakotans for Ethics Reform?” There’s nothing involving “South Dakota” or “Ethics” with it. It’s just big out of state money trying to use South Dakotans. Once again.
