Category: Uncategorized

Today, Marty Jackley was talking to the Sioux Falls Rotary club, proposing that maybe we do need another level of government in South Dakota in the form of an ethics commission. From the Argus Leader:

Attorney General Marty Jackley encouraged Sioux Falls Rotary Club members to support a proposed ethics commission, a provision of a ballot measure narrowly approved last month by voters.

and..

“The voters of South Dakota spoke and they said there needs to be some level of change and I think that change ought to focus on an ethics commission,” Jackley said. “I don’t think we should necessarily be scared of that, we should embrace it.”

and..

Another prominent Republican, Secretary of State Shantel Krebs on Monday said she’d also been working on a proposal to create an independent review or ethics commission to be managed by her office.

“You can count two Republicans in on this,” Krebs said. “You will hear me testifying in favor of some sort of ethics commission in South Dakota.”

Read it all here.

I don’t think it serves much purpose to grow government, and have a commission for the sake of having a commission, so we can go “Yay. We did something.”  But I also get the sense that given the turmoil over constant political accusations that have flown around the capitol for the past few years, that both Marty and the Secretary of State might have an interest in offloading those headaches to someone else.

Investigating charges of improper disclaimers, whether someone may or may not have actually circulated their petitions; Allegations over whether a donation was reported properly, or did so-and-so at that College turn in those voter registrations forms, and on and on…  now those types of issues might more properly find themselves housed with a group empaneled and charged with making a firm determination, and assessing a penalty when warranted.

This would be opposed to these matters bouncing around state government between one person who would like to spend more of their time prosecuting murderers and rapists, and another who would like to run elections. If investigating and adjudicating issues of that nature was the purpose and charge of an ethics panel, that might actually make a little sense.

But I’m very wary about spending hundreds of thousands, if not millions on a panel that operates with little to no oversight, with an ill-defined or useless mission.

If Marty wants to make that proposal, and have it serve a real purpose, that could make the difference between something useless, and something real.

Bridging that gap in reality? That could be the challenge.

Trump is vetting Kristi Noem, South Dakota’s lone member of Congress, for Agriculture secretary. She’ll be visiting Trump Tower this week

— Jeremy W. Peters (@jwpetersNYT) December 12, 2016

I don’t think I’m telling you anything you don’t know if I note that I think a lot of Governor Daugaard, and believe him to be a good an decent person.  But, I’m truly, truly disappointed in him for a statement he made this past week.

South Dakota will be fine without payday lenders that pay excessive interest rates, Gov. Dennis Daugaard said Friday.

The statement came in response to the news that dozens of short-term lenders across the state plan to shutter following the implementation of a voter-approved cap on the industry’s interest rates.

“Certainly to the extent that they were only economically viable because they are subsidized by the earnings from excess interest charges, it’s certainly unfortunate, but I don’t think it justifies unreasonable interest charges,” Daugaard told Argus Leader Media. “So if we have to do without those things, then we have to do without them.”

Read that here.

It’s not the first time it’s happened, where the Governor has seemingly substituted his personal morality in an issue and expressed a desire to limit freedom. If you recall the 2013 fight over changing laws to allow MMA fights to happen in South Dakota:

South Dakota Gov. Dennis Daugaard says he opposes a bill that would create a state athletic commission because it would legitimize mixed martial arts fights, events he says are so violent they don’t deserve to be called sports.

and..

But Daugaard says he is offended that the state would legitimize what he calls cage fighting. He says it’s absurd to call such violence a sport.

Read that here.

Along similar lines as his opposition against Mixed Martial Arts bouts because he likened them to “violence,” we again had the Governor speaking out because he believes businesses charging a sufficient amount to cover the costs of loaning money for a matter of a few weeks or months is not something they should do in South Dakota.

For long-time readers, I don’t think I have to express my personal disdain for the nanny state.

Why would we spend millions in tax dollars through state government for economic development to attract businesses, when the Governor declares that we only need certain businesses that he approves of, and we’ll do fine without them?  I think it’s an incredibly dangerous thing for the Governor to say.

Because what happens if another Governor comes along and decides they dislike a certain type of mining?  Or wants to ban energy production from the use of coal?

I’m sure I could argue until I’m blue in the face that there are going to be a number of people of common means affected by the loss of short term lending, as very few (or no) banks are going to want to take on the high risk/low return lending activity at an unsustainable lending rate. Because now, those disenfranchised people are going to be stuck.

But as big an issue as that will become, there’s a bigger one. We’ve established that sparsely populated South Dakota’s is a little less free. And we’ve started down the road our chief executive telling us we’ll be “fine” without a certain type of business.

Personally, whether or not I chose to patronize them is a decision I would have rather made myself.

Interesting item in this weekends’ Brookings paper. There’s a strong possibility that outgoing State Representative Scott Munsterman may be swapping positions with the incoming State Representative and outgoing Brookings Mayor, Tim Reed:

The rest of the article – among city business items – notes that Scott had responded to the city’s November 9 call for mayoral applicants to replace Reed (who is resigning to serve in Pierre), noting his desire to help the city of Brookings during the transition.

Given his prior success while mayor, which helped launch him to run for Governor, I can’t think of anyone better for the job.

From Keloland, Congresswoman Noem opened up her home to combat teen suicide on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation to help fund a hotline, as well as to contribute towards counselors.

Read it all here.

A reader pointed out last night that one of the state’s far-left liberal websites was shedding bitter tears and blubbering over the loss of one of their own state senators in this past months’ election, trying to minimize the victory of the Republican over the entrenched Democrat incumbent, by raising the silly specter of evil RV voters. It wouldn’t be the first time it was used as a cheap excuse.

You lose, so straws are grasped at. However, talk is cheap. Especially when it is woefully and hopelessly uninformed.

Republican numbers were increased in the legislature this year because of a number of factors. In South Dakota, Republican numbers continue to increase while Democrat numbers are in a sharp decline. In terms of supporting their candidates, State Democrats were utterly worthless, and fell flat on their faces.

And then there’s the other, and the single most important factors that I judge candidacies on: Work. There were a number of candidates that put the time in, and worked. They worked hard, and ultimately, voters rewarded them for it.

Time and again, whether it’s in a Republican primary or a general election, a candidate who gets out and does the work will defeat a candidate who simply goes through the motions.

You saw it with Jordan Youngberg in Madison. Jordan was a young, largely unknown candidate running against Democrat State Senator Scott Parsley. Youngberg immediately got out and made his mark, and showed everyone he was a hard working candidate who reflected the views of his legislative district. He wasn’t perfect by any means, and he made some rookie mistakes.

But the entire time he was working hard, and made a strong, concerted effort going door to door, leaving Parsley to try to play catch-up the entire time. Youngberg is now Senator elect.

Tom Pischke was another hard working candidate. In the District 25 race, he wasn’t a candidate with a large campaign account. He raised and spent around $8,000 in the general election, with a chunk of that coming from the GOP House PAC.

Pischke was in a district with Roger Hunt, one of the State’s longer serving legislators, and Dan Ahlers, one of the few Democrats who had been able to deliver a win in this largely GOP District. When the votes were tallied, as a result of his hard work going door to door, Pischke found himself leading the entire pack in a strong first place finish with Ahlers narrowly squeaking out a win over Hunt.

Same thing in the District that surrounds mine, and shoots off to the north – Republican John Wiik who ran against Democrat Kathy Tyler for the Senate Seat in District 4.  Wiik went out and worked his tail off, and Tyler’s effort was mediocre at best. Wiik beat her hands down.

The value of hard work by a candidate in a campaign can’t be ignored, and should never, ever, be dismissed. Hard working candidates have beaten “country club” candidates more times than you can count.

As much as some candidates try to treat them that way – Voters aren’t stupid. They can recognize the difference between an egotist sending them vanity advertising and a candidate who is out working hard, and running for the right reasons.

A good lesson for prospective candidates for 2018. If you’re going to run, and want to improve your chances of winning, you’d better be prepared to do the work.

Finishing Strong and Looking Ahead
By Sen. John Thune

I’ve worked hard over the last two years delivering on my promise to help get the Senate working more efficiently and effectively for the people of South Dakota. Because when hard-working taxpayers ask themselves if Washington is listening – if Washington is paying attention to their struggles – I want them to know the answer is yes, loud and clear. An accountable government begins with accountable representatives, and my work in Washington is committed to that end.

One of the most effective and gratifying ways for me to be responsive to South Dakotans is to fight for policy initiatives that correct problems they’ve encountered or help avoid those problems from happening again in the future. The work I’ve done to help prevent future out-of-control prescribed burns is a good example.

The Pautre fire was supposed to be a small 100-acre prescribed burn in Western South Dakota. And while prescribed burns can be an effective land management tool, this particular fire did far more harm than good. Because of unsafe fire conditions, the fire quickly grew beyond the U.S. Forest Service’s (USFS’s) control and torched 16,000 acres of public and private land and destroyed millions of dollars of property along the way.

Thanks to legislation I authored, the USFS will now be required to consult with state and local officials – the people who know the land better than anyone else – prior to starting a prescribed burn in South Dakota or any other state when fire danger is extreme and conditions are unsafe. It’s a common-sense idea that will have a real and meaningful impact on ranchers and property owners with property adjoining or near USFS land.

Another good example is my nearly year-long fight to ensure South Dakota schools that depend on the Impact Aid program didn’t face hundreds of thousands of dollars in funding cuts, which would have had a negative effect on the students those schools serve. I teamed up with a bipartisan group of senators whose states would have also faced massive funding cuts to correct an error in the law and protect these schools and students.

These are just a few items Congress tackled in the final days of the 114th Congress, and there are a lot more wins where these came from. We’ve been able to get a lot of big things over the finish line over the last few years, and in the areas where there’s more work to do, I’ll keep my nose to the grindstone, continuing to work hard to deliver the positive results South Dakotans want and expect.

###

The Need for a Strong Military
By Senator Mike Rounds

The number one responsibility of the federal government is to provide for the defense of our country. One way we do that is by passing the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) each year. The NDAA, which has passed the Senate every year for more than 55 years, is a vital piece of legislation that shows our service members and their families that they have the full backing of Congress. I am pleased that the NDAA for fiscal year 2017 passed the Senate with overwhelming support and now heads to the president’s desk to be signed into law.

Like years past, this year’s NDAA includes policies to support our wounded warriors, our troops and their families. It also provides our armed forces with the tools needed to deter our adversaries and combat our enemies around the globe. It increases the Department of Defense (DOD) operations and maintenance authorized budget which will allow for more ground and aviation training, additional flight hours to train pilots and better ship maintenance to keep our fleet in good condition for years to come. It also stops the Pentagon’s proposed drawdown of 15,000 soldiers, 2,000 marines and approximately 4,000 airmen. This is important at a time when our military is the smallest it has been since World War II.

As a member of the Senate Armed Services and Veterans’ Affairs Committees, providing our troops and veterans with the tools they need and care they’ve been promised are top priorities. The NDAA includes amendments that I offered this year, including language from my Cyber Act of War Act that would require the president to submit a report to Congress defining when an act in cyber space requires a military response. It also includes provisions to improve DOD’s monitoring of prescriptions dispensed at military treatment facilities for the treatment of PTSD and legislation to require training of DOD hiring officials so they can hire qualified civilian cyber security professionals in an expedited manner.

As we mark the 75th anniversary of the attack on Pearl Harbor this December, we are reminded of the need to protect our homeland from devastating attacks at the hands of our enemies. Pearl Harbor marked a pivotal turning point in the United States’ approach to national security strategy, and our success in World War II established the United States as a world superpower. In recent years, the size of our armed forces has shrunk to levels that increase the risk that we may not be able to deter adversaries or, with deterrence having failed, defeat them in combat. This year’s NDAA begins to reverse that trend.

While not perfect, the NDAA we passed this year authorizes the resources that our armed forces need to remain capable of adequately defending the United States. We owe nothing less to our service members than to give them all they need to succeed.

###

South Dakota Energy
By Rep. Kristi Noem

People get the “Dakotas” confused all the time. I can’t tell you how many times people in DC have asked me about the impact of the oil boom in our state, having little idea that the Bakken oil field largely rests north of South Dakota’s border. Even without the oil reserves, however, our state plays a role in filling the nation’s gas tanks, contributing the resources needed to produce renewable fuels, like ethanol and biodiesel.

As many reading this know, I have spent most of my life growing corn and soybeans. These crops are staples of the American food supply, but these commodities are becoming a part of our domestic fuel supply too. With advances in technology, we are growing more on fewer acres and are using that efficiency to diversify the market. This year, about 26 percent of the soybean oil consumed in the U.S. will be used for biodiesel production and around 5 billion bushels of corn will be used for ethanol. Turning corn and soybeans into fuel not only opens the door for better prices and greater market stability, but also offers broader benefits for our national economy and security.

The biodiesel industry alone supports nearly 50,000 U.S. jobs and ethanol supports tens of thousands more. These are plant workers, researchers and engineers. They’re truckers and salespeople. They’re members of our community who turn around and support local economies, spending money at area businesses and supporting schools and infrastructure with their tax dollars. It’s a fuel that invests – and then reinvests again – in America.

On the flip side, around one-third of petroleum used in America is derived from foreign sources. This means the United States spends more than $300 billion each year on imported crude oil. Many times, the oil is coming from volatile areas of the world and countries that are wary of America’s continued prosperity. Every step we take toward energy independence is a step we take toward security. That’s why we need to invest in both fossil fuels and renewable fuels.

While biofuel production has grown quite a bit in recent years, it still makes up only a small portion of the overall market. Since our nation’s founding, America has invested in new technologies like this, offering help until they’re strong enough to stand on their own. Today, as part of an all-of-the-above American energy strategy, we must do the same for biofuels.

One of the ways in which we encourage biofuel growth is through the Renewable Fuel Standard – or RFS. The RFS sets annual goals for the amount of ethanol and biodiesel that must be incorporated into America’s fuel supply. The EPA has often fallen short of what Congress proposed, particularly when it comes to ethanol requirements. Last month, however, for the first time in a number of years, the EPA brought the RFS in line with congressional goals. Since the RFS is re-examined each year, we must continue to hold the EPA accountable, ensuring the agency makes American-grown energy a priority for the future.

Various forms of energy also have different provisions in the tax code. For biodiesel, we offer a $1-per-gallon tax credit, which can result in cheaper fuel at the pump. Legislation I’ve proposed would give more certainty regarding the tax credit’s availability while also adjusting how the support is distributed. The change would ensure the incentive is encouraging American biodiesel production, not the importation of foreign biodiesel – a move consistent with our goal of achieving American energy independence.

My number one responsibility is to keep the American people safe. Protecting economic opportunities comes in at a close second. By supporting homegrown fuels, we accomplish both while also distinguishing South Dakota as an energy-rich state.

###

An Overview Of The Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Proposal
A column by Gov. Dennis Daugaard:

The week of the annual Budget Address is always a busy time in the Capitol Building, and this year is no exception. The halls are filled with Christmas trees and with hundreds of visitors who come to see them. We also welcome newly-elected legislators, incumbents, and those whose legislative service is ending, to discuss the state budget for the upcoming year. After the address, I travel to different parts of the state for my budget tour where I lay out the good news and the bad news of South Dakota’s economy.

The news came as no surprise to those who attended Tuesday’s Budget Address. Our state’s revenue for the first several months of the current fiscal year has fallen short of projections, in large part because of lower sales tax collections.  Recent revenue weakness is a problem many other states share.

The good news is that the South Dakota Council of Economic Advisors projects South Dakota will see steady but slow economic growth in the next few years. According to the council’s economic forecast, although farm income is weak, nonfarm income is expected to grow at rates that are near historical highs.

Additionally, the state won’t need to spend all of the money that was appropriated by the Legislature last year. Total state spending in the current budget year is projected to be $34.7 million less than what was budgeted last session. Over the past several years, the state has also received stocks in the unclaimed property fund, and converting those stocks to cash will also generate funds on a one-time basis.

Through these savings, the state will be able to meet the revenue shortfall and appropriate modest increases for our priority areas. For the upcoming fiscal year, I am proposing a 1 percent increase for education, health care providers and state employees. 

I am also proposing that the state add more money to our rainy day funds. It has been my goal to keep the state’s reserves at 10 percent of general fund spending, and right now the reserves are at 9.8 percent. I am recommending that the state add $2.4 million of one-time money to reserves to bring the funds back to the 10 percent level. Among the 50 states, the median rainy day fund is 5 percent.

I am also recommending that we use one-time money to help fund the state Animal Disease Research and Diagnostic Laboratory, which is South Dakota’s animal health laboratory, located on the SDSU campus. The lab’s purpose is to provide critical research and diagnostic support to protect our citizens and livestock industry from disease outbreaks. Most recently, the lab responded to outbreaks of Avian Influenza in poultry and PEDV in swine. The facility is out of date and needs to be modernized to meet operating standards.

Given our current revenue situation and what other states are dealing with right now, South Dakota is fortunate not to be looking at spending cuts or freezes this year. It is thanks to our adherence to conservative budget practices that, even in a year like this one, we are in a position to balance our budget and slightly increase spending for education and Medicaid. I look forward to a good debate about the proposed budget with the Legislature and the public over the next few months. 

-30-