So, where’s the story?
This is on the Argus website tonight… But the link is dead.
This is on the Argus website tonight… But the link is dead.
from the Associated Press:
Noem campaign consultant Justin Brasell said he’s pleased with the fundraising pace for the quarter and that the congresswoman’s cash on hand total “puts her far and away in the best position she’s ever been in to start a new election cycle.”
and…
Minnehaha County Commissioner Jeff Barth, a Democrat and veteran South Dakota political observer, said Noem is “absolutely” an easier target for Democrats than Thune. He said the party should announce its candidates for both races at Saturday’s McGovern Day 2015, which is the largest annual gathering for South Dakota Democrats and this year features an appearance from Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
So, is Jeff Barth intimating they will announce opponents…. Or is he saying the Democrats should have opponents, and setting up Ann Tornberg for failure?
We’ll see.
Thune to NPS: Accept Responsibility for Cold Brook Fire
“The NPS needs to accept responsibility for this fire, assume liability for damages and expenses, and change its burn policies.”
WASHINGTON, D.C.— In a letter to U.S. Secretary of the Department of Interior Sally Jewell, U.S. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) today called on the National Park Service (NPS) to change its prescribed burn policies. Thune also called on the NPS to accept full liability for damages and expenses to individuals and local and state government entities and provide a timeline and process for reimbursement for the April 13 Cold Brook Fire that burned more than 6,500 acres in Wind Cave National Park.
“It’s been just over two years since landowners and ranchers suffered losses due to the Pautre Fire in northwest South Dakota resulting from an irresponsible prescribed burn set by yet another federal agency when extremely dry conditions and high fire danger were present,” said Thune. “The Cold Brook Fire started by the NPS is just another example of a federal agency taking questionable action without first collaborating with adjacent landowners and local and state officials. The NPS needs to accept responsibility for this fire, assume liability for damages and expenses, and change its burn policies. I am going to continue to hold the NPS accountable and look forward to seeing the agency’s response to my requested prescribed burn policy modifications and timeline for reimbursement.”
On April 13, 2015, the NPS conducted a prescribed burn in the southern portion of Wind Cave National Park, located in the Black Hills. The prescribed burn was intended to cover 1,100 acres; however, due to the extreme dry conditions present at the prescribed burn site, the Cold Brook Fire quickly escalated out of control consuming more than 6,500 acres of Wind Cave National Park.
The text of Thune’s letter is below:
__
April 16, 2015
Secretary Sally Jewell
U.S. Department of the Interior
1849 C Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20240
Dear Secretary Jewell:
On April 13, 2015, the National Park Service Forest Service (NPS) conducted a prescribed burn in the southern portion of Wind Cave National Park, located in the Black Hills of South Dakota. The prescribed burn was intended to cover 1,100 acres; however, due to the extremely dry conditions present at the prescribed burn site the fire, named the Cold Brook Fire, quickly escalated out of control consuming more than 6,500 acres of Wind Cave National Park.
In certain circumstances prescribed burns play an important role in federal lands management. However, when a prescribed burn is the recommended management tool, intentionally setting one for any reason in tinder dry forestland or grassland when extremely dry conditions exist is entirely unwarranted and inexcusable and once started has a high likelihood of burning out of control. Historically, carelessly set prescribed burns have resulted in unnecessary endangerment of firefighters, and have destroyed homes, personal property, and public lands.
I strongly urge a thorough and critical review of the Department’s prescribed burn policies and collaboration with local and state authorities and adjacent landowners prior to initiating any future burn. The current prescribed burn practice of following a “prescription” checklist before starting a fire obviously is not adequately preventing prescribed burns from being set in unsafe conditions that are resulting in out-of-control wildfires. There is an urgent need for you to do more to ensure that prescribed burns can continue to be used as a management tool without jeopardizing lives and property.
I fully expect the Department of Interior to assume complete liability for any damages caused as a result of the Cold Brook Fire. Even though the fire was contained to Wind Cave National Park property, I have been informed that fire lines were established on private property and that the intense smoke will likely damage the lungs of young calves in the vicinity resulting in high risk of pneumonia and death loss.
Within 30 days please provide me with a detailed plan for reimbursement to all who were damaged due to this fire, including private individuals, landowners, and local, county, and state entities who suffered economic losses or contributed resources to fighting this fire. Included in the requested plan please provide how claims will be established and processed, and the timeline for reimbursement.
The Cold Brook Fire could easily have been prevented and I strongly urge you to take whatever actions necessary to prevent future occurrences. I fully expect the Department to accept full responsibility and liability for the damages, losses, and expenses due to this fire.
Sincerely,
###
WATCH: @DWStweets Again Refuses to Say Whether Her Party Opposes Ban on 3rd-Tri Abortions
http://t.co/eNFOCROjgt pic.twitter.com/xrbT1tePeW
— National Review (@NRO) April 15, 2015
Just a reminder not to forget the Brown County GOP Lincoln Day Dinner tomorrow night, Featuring Senator Thune & Congresswoman Noem, and emceed by Lt Gov Matt Michels.
Social at 5:30, Dinner at 6:30. Tickets are $40 each or $280 per table.
According to their facebook page, there are a couple of ways to purchase tickets, You can Call Char at 380-8370 or Wayne at 380-3560. Or order them online at: https://
Word is this will be another dinner with people rumored to have an interest in the 2018 Governor’s race all in attendance.
This last election, South Dakota Democratic Chairwoman Ann Tornberg ran as an allegedly pro-life candidate in the District 16 State Senate race, shortly before becoming the State Democratic Party Chairwoman.
If that’s the case, does she intend to ask the speaker at the SDDP State Dinner, National Democratic Party Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz at what point it’s inappropriate to conduct an abortion on a 7 pound baby?
Because she’s doing a lot of evasion of the question with CNN and Fox News.
Since Ann’s allegedly this pro-life warrior, maybe she can find out from her chairwoman?
Hot off the press – US Senator John Thune is posting big numbers for the first Quarter of 2015.
As of March 31st, I’m told he raised $792,808, and has $10.37 Million Cash in Hand.
Not bad. Not bad at all.
I had someone mention to me over noon that last night on the Argus Leader’s 100 eyes webcast, Jon Ellis mentioned that, this weekend at their state dinner, a Dem legislator is supposedly going to announce that they’re going to run against Republican Kristi Noem for Congress.
I hadn’t heard of any Democrat legislators suffering debilitating head injuries robbing them of their sense, so I can only assume one has overdosed on democrat Kool-Aid.
Anyone hear who this poor unfortunate soul being offered up for sacrifice will be?
The voters of the Sioux Falls School District just completed an election that may have influence beyond the border of this school district.
To the extent the argument blossoms beyond the Sioux Falls School District, I think the arguments will be the same. The question is will they be handled differently in other school districts.
Pre-Labor Day argument as presented by the Sioux Falls School District:
Post-Labor Day argument as presented principally by Wendy McDonnel and Christine Erickson:
First, I think it wholly appropriate that the administration of the Sioux Falls School District would advocate and be passionate about a Pre-Labor Days start. To large degree, college testing, scholarships, and sending graduates to college is the culmination of 13 years of “doing their job.” I have not always agreed with Pam Homan but I’m appalled how she has been criticized and thrown under the bus by her School Board and deserves better. She did exactly what one would expect from a Superintendent- advocate what she thought best AND support the position of the School Board.
Second, parents have a broader set of priorities. While appreciating and supporting the value of a good education, parents don’t want their child to just be as smart as possible or get in the best colleges or get the most scholarships. They want their child to be balanced with a broad range of experiences. They want their child to be connected to extended family. They want their child to be instilled with their family values. Summer is when parents set the agenda and have the most unfettered opportunity to form their children as they see fit.
Third, I think it appropriate that the School Board would look at the issue beginning with the what they believed was net-net best for students as students. However, the School Board isn’t just a reflection of the administration but they are also a reflection of parents’ priorities beyond education.
This is where things got off track when the School Board took the intransigent position that AP college testing, scholarships etc. became the only measure of what is good for the children under their care and whether one places a priority on education with no consideration of parental priorities. The School Board should be looking at these children as more than students but also consider them as members of a family and society needing more than just a good education.
In the real world, there are very few issues so transcendental that all other considerations can be ignored.
My stomach turns when I hear/read the following comments from School Board members or people like Stu Whitney at the Argus who show DISDAIN for parents who give family considerations and broader formation of their children priority.
Re-elected School Board Member Todd Toelke: “It shows the concern of the almighty dollar over education.” Sure I get that tourism, retailers, summer leisure businesses wanted a later start date. But, if that is all he got out of the vote, I’m pretty sure he isn’t listening to his primary constituents- the parents of the children entrusted to him.
A person I over-heard on TV this morning. I didn’t get his name: “The voters spoke that they value when they get to take their vacation more than educating their children.” (Paraphrase)
Stu Whitney at the Argus Leader whose article today exemplifies the disregard for the “Voice in Local Control” group’s concerns and views:
But, not once did “Voice in Local Control” even hint it was about tourism. You have a new job where your focus isn’t just high school sports. You need to expand your circle of influence. I talked with literally dozens of people who wanted a later start date and not once was tourism or money mentioned. If that had been the primary justification, this would have been soundly defeated. If you don’t know that, you should. If you know that, your article was intellectually dishonest and slanderous.
Elections come and go. Top of mind issues come and go. Whether this decision was the “right” decision can be debated.
But, this effort led by Wendy McDonnel, who once was a cute little girl with a big smile and pig tails, just might be one of those efforts that ripples in ways we can’t foresee:
Family matters and one might want to pause before taking on a mother told otherwise. Its a lesson I learned the summer of 1970 when I got between a cow and her calf.
I’ve got an office thing tomorrow night, so I finally got around to updating and expanding my button board for hanging in my office space. And it prompted me to post a reminder – if anyone is interested in South Dakota political pins, I’m always looking to trade duplicates for ones I don’t have.