7 thoughts on “Dakota Posts takes on cherry picked votes”

  1. If I’m reading this correctly, they’re spot on with trying to ‘sell’ CFL’s scorecard when the top scoring legislator is the author. Simply amazing. Guess I’ll have to follow this Dakota Posts group.

  2. If cherry picking means using key bills where liberals went one direction and conservatives went another, then there is no good reason to use negative attacks in order to protect the liberals.

    1. Steve, dont even try to defend CFL on this, Their list of bills they chose were so blatantly obvious in trying to reach a predetermined outcome that it was almost embarrassing. Ironic that an organization that supposedly works to stop corruption would be corrupt to the point of trying to warp the records of lawmakers to make their cronies look good. Shameless, absolutely shameless.

      1. i think we need a super-task force, self appointed by volunteers and fully funded in the constitution, to compile all official cherry picked lists going forward.

      2. “Shameless” is a good description of CFL – but it’s too soft. The entourage of CFL groupies are proud hypocrites and glaring liars. They’re the allies (the ONLY allies, I might add) of the Lautenschlauger Klan and the SDGO clique.

        And let’s not forget that the cherry-picked scorecard’s “#1, MOST CONSERVATIVE!!” SD Representative just happens to be the WIFE of CFL’s President.

        CFL? Pitiful.

Comments are closed.