Regental employees now cleared to run for SD Legislature

From Keloland News, a decades old policy has now been reversed with the decision of the Supreme Court, and the permission of the SD Board of Regents:

On Thursday, the regents reversed their official policy that said their employees couldn’t serve as state lawmakers unless they resigned from their jobs before starting their terms.

and..

Peterson served on the Appropriations Committee and for several years was its chair. Frederick praised the change and said it would have been a loss to South Dakotans if Peterson had been banned because of his employment.

Read the entire story here.

Rounds Introduces Legislation to Offer Affordable Student Loan Option

Rounds Introduces Legislation to Offer Affordable Student Loan Option

The Affordable Future Loan Program Act would utilize private financial institutions to cover the cost of college

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) introduced legislation to offer a new affordable student loan option that would leverage private financial institutions to cover the cost of college. By guaranteeing loans made through eligible lenders and making sure no interest accrues while students are in school, the Affordable Future Loan Program Act provides students a sustainable and affordable solution.

The Affordable Future Loan Program would exist alongside the current system and would provide another option for financing or for students who need to fill the gap between federal aid and the cost to attend most public institutions. The program is inspired by the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFEL) that was created by the Higher Education Act of 1965 but repealed in 2010. Since 2010, all federal loans have been issued by the Department of Education (ED).

“Students in South Dakota and across the nation need a more affordable way to take out loans and pay for higher education,” said Rounds. “The Affordable Future Loan Program would allow students to use private financial institutions to take out federal loans. By utilizing the efficiencies of the private sector and providing enough financing to cover the actual cost of going to school, this program will ultimately save money for hardworking students and their families. While it doesn’t change any existing programs, this bill would provide a low-interest choice for financing education and take Washington bureaucrats out of the process.”

“With guaranteed loans that do not accrue interest while students are in school, the act provides a lifeline to students who struggle to bridge the gap between federal aid and the rising costs of higher education. Senator Rounds’ innovative approach will make higher education attainable for all Americans, preserving the dream of college for future generations,” said Jeff Olson, President-CEO, Dakota Credit Union Association. “The Affordable Future Loan Program Act, championed by Senator Mike Rounds, offers a crucial solution to the pressing issue of college affordability. By leveraging the private sector to create a sustainable and affordable loan product, this legislation ensures that middle-class families across the country are no longer burdened with long-term debt.”

“Choosing a college or trade school is a decision most students look forward to making, but with rising costs and a decrease in available financing, these decisions have become an impossible burden for middle class families,” said Jim Nussle, President/CEO of America’s Credit Unions. “Senator Rounds’ Affordable Future Loan Program Act – legislation that America’s Credit Unions fully supports – brings new life to these important, life-altering decisions. Whether you are choosing to pursue an undergraduate degree or seeking a trade education, this bill helps close the gap in affordable loan options, sets students up for success, and better ensures their financial well-being.”

“I appreciate Senator Rounds trying to pull together local, state, and federal stakeholders in education,” said South Dakota Senator Steve Kolbeck. “It’s clear he wants to keep what is working, fix what is broken, and bring back what has worked in the past. I’m optimistic he can help us push local control and education financing to be more community focused while still maintaining accountability of tax dollars. Over regulation is as harmful to education as under regulation is and finding commonsense solutions should be achievable.”

“I commend Senator Rounds for addressing the issue of student loan reform and looking for ways to include the private sector in this solution,” said Dylan Clarkson, President & CEO of Pioneer Bank & Trust and Chairman of the South Dakota Bankers Association. “Offering a more affordable student loan option is not only good for students, but also good for local banks and the economy.”

The Affordable Future Loan Program Act would issue federal student loans through private financial institutions. Loans would be guaranteed 98% by the federal government when the student attends an accredited institution. Students are able to borrow equal to the average cost to attend a public university plus room and board. Students would not accrue interest while they are in school, and the interest rate would be set by the Treasury 10-year note instead of Congress as it is currently.

Under Rounds’ plan, the maximum interest rate that may apply is capped at 6.28%, while right now the interest rates for ED range from 6.53%-9.08%.

Click HERE for full bill text. Click HERE to read a one page summary of the bill.

###

Just got this in for my collection, showing how we kicked those northern Dakota Territory residents to the curb in 1887

Just got this in for my collection, in what might be one of my earliest campaign pieces for South Dakota. Or as it was known then, Dakota Territory:

This is the election where we kicked those guys up North to the curb, as evidenced in this Republican Ticket.  Literally, this is a very early slate card with the Republican Candidates showing people how to vote, and noting the “question of division of the Territory of Dakota, upon an east and west line upon the 7th Standard Parallel.”   Or, what you know as the current border between North and South Dakota.

You can actually find a few references to this election on-line:

The Territorial Legislature of 1887 submitted the question of division to a popular vote at the general election of November 1887. When full returns of this election finally came in on January 10, 1888, Territorial Governor Louis K. Church announced the vote: 37,784 favored division and 32,913 were opposed.

(Via Wikipedia, which you can read here)

November 1887, finally counted in January 10 of 1888. Which tells you how long one one of the earliest hand counts took to finally figure out.

A great item chronicling South Dakota History! (I might have to have this one framed)

Democrats clear the slate in D20 Legislative Races

Just like they did in Legislative District 7, Democrats have completely cleared their legislative slate in District 20.  No indication whether there will be replacement candidates yet, but it’s unusual to clear out these races by the District.

According to the Secretary of State, August 6 is the last day for candidates to withdraw nominations from general election. Once a candidate withdraws, the last day for party central committees to fill vacancies created by candidates who withdrew their nominations is August 13.

Keep watching who is coming and going – only about 2 weeks until the slate is set.

Attorney General Jackley Announces Indictments Against State Prison Inmates, Former DOC Employees

Attorney General Jackley Announces Indictments Against State Prison Inmates, Former DOC Employees

PIERRE, S.D. – South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley announces that a Minnehaha County Grand Jury Monday indicted six people regarding five different cases involving South Dakota Prison inmates and two others who were Department of Corrections staff members at that time.

“Assaults on prison staff, possession of weapons and contraband, and destruction of property in our prison will not be tolerated,” said Attorney General Jackley. “This conduct endangered prison staff and inmates and will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.”

Those are charged are:

Case One

          *** Prison Inmate Tyler Dane Larvie, 28, nine felony counts of Possession of an Article Indulgence (synthetic cannabinoids). The charges occurred on or about Jan. 24, 2024.

Case Two

          *** Inmate Tyler Dane Larvie, 28, one felony count of Criminal Solicitation, one felony count of Conspiracy to Commit Second Degree Arson, and one felony count of Aiding and Abetting Second Degree Arson.

         *** Former DOC Medication Aide Madyson Alexis Bixby, 21, Sioux Falls, one felony count of Conspiracy to Commit Second Degree Arson and one felony count of Possession of an Unauthorized Article (a cellphone delivered to an inmate).

*** Merced Patlan, 30, Sioux Falls, (not a DOC staff member) one felony count of Second Degree Arson and one felony count of Conspiracy to Commit Second Degree Arson.

             Larvie and Bixby are charged with conspiring with Patlan to destroy another person’s vehicle. The crimes occurred between Dec. 1, 2023 and Jan. 4, 2024. The actual arson occurred on Jan. 4, 2024 in Sioux Falls.

Case Three

          *** Former DOC nurse Alexis Rose Hiller, 27, Sioux Falls, charged with one felony count of Possession of a Controlled Substance (Buprenorphine) with Intent to Distribute, one felony count of Possession of a Controlled Substance (Buprenorphine), and one felony count of Possession of Unauthorized Article (Buprenorphine) With Intent to Deliver to An Inmate. The charges occurred on or near Jan. 31, 2024.

Case Four

          *** Prison Inmate Seth Thomas Peplinski, 24, charged with one felony count of Aggravated Assault, and one felony count of Simple Assault. He is accused of assaulting another person in the prison on May 6, 2024.

Case Five

          *** Prison Inmate Kelly Michael Irby, 64, Possession of a Weapon by an Inmate (blade). The charges occurred on or about May 8, 2024.

Initial court appearances for those charged have not yet been scheduled. All of the defendants are presumed innocent under the U.S. Constitution.

-30-

Coalition of Confederates attacking SDGOP again, demanding special meeting

Remember the Coalition of Confederates who want to push the Republican Party’s cart down the road of their agenda, and out Republican officeholders, versus electing Republicans to office?

They’re back at it, and this time – through an anonymous e-mail they’ve sent out – they’re demanding that the South Dakota Republican Party hold a summer meeting in the election year… which they’ve never done before, because there’s this thing we all went to called a convention:

From: SD_Coalition_of_Counties <SD_Coalition_of_Counties@proton.me>
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2024 2:41 PM
To: chairman@sdgop.com… (and others – pp)
Subject: Rquest to Convene a Special Meeting of the South Dakota Republican Party Central Committee

You don’t often get email from sd_coalition_of_counties@proton.me. Learn why this is important
[DISCLAIMER: This anonymous email account is being used merely for convenience purposes, as all county chairmen/chairs are equals in this matter, and not all signatories below are members of the “Coalition of Counties” at this time.]

Chairman Wiik and State Executive Board members,

In conjunction with discussion and consensus with several regional directors, we the undersigned county chairpersons/chairperson designees of the twenty-four (24) counties listed below hereby exercise our designated authority under Section I, Paragraph 7-B of the South Dakota Republican Party Bylaws in light of your prior agreement as expressed in your July 28 email response to our request to convene the State Republican Party Bylaw-required Summer Meeting and therefore now initiate the call of a necessary Special Meeting of the State Central Committee on August 24, 2024, in Oacoma, S.D. Based both on our GOP Bylaw requirement for such a meeting and given the pending pivotal issues facing the Party in the upcoming general election, the necessary purpose of this Special Meeting is to deal with pressing general election issues and other related State Central Committee matters.

Accordingly, we are herewith forwarding this call of the pending Special Meeting to Secretary Oakes in order for her to officially distribute/notice-up the same for the State Central Committee by on or before August 6, 2024, to all State Central Committee members in order to formally notify said members sufficiently in advance of such Special Meeting with the following information included in such notice of meeting:

Subject: South Dakota Republican Party State Central Committee Special Meeting;

Date: Saturday, August 24, 2024; Time: 9:30 am to 2:30 pm;
Where: Cedar Shores, Oacoma, S.D.;
Call of Special Meeting Notice: General Election information discussion & campaign strategy coordination and other related State Central Committee matters;Pizza lunch to be provided at the meeting location [committee members to provide their own for beverage(s)].

For any State Central Committee members who may want additional notification of this Special Meeting by USPS mail, if any, please advise the State Republican Party Secretary.

As called by and through the following State Central Committee county delegation members:

Chairman, Aurora County
Chairman, Bennett County
Chairman, Bon Homme County
Vice Chair, Butte County
Chairman, Campbell County
Chairman, Charles Mix County
Chairman, Corson County
Chair, Custer County
Chairman, Davison County
Chair, Deuel County
Chair, Fall River County
Chair, Hand County
Chair, Hanson County
Chair, Harding County
Chairman, Jackson County
Chair, Lincoln County
Chairman, McPherson County
Chairman, Minnehaha County
Chair, Pennington County
Chairman, Todd County
Chairman, Tripp County
Chairman, Turner County
Chairman, Yankton County
Chair, Ziebach County

Well, first off, can they call a meeting based on an anonymous e-mail? If they were “undersigned county chairpersons/chairperson designees,” wouldn’t they normally send their demand in writing?  Otherwise, anyone could send an anonymous e-mail and demand a meeting.

Secondly, what do they hope to accomplish? Several in this group have contributed towards the toxicity in the SDGOP which has crippled it’s fundraising ability.  Is their goal to try some kind of half-baked takeover?

I’m hearing through the grapevine that the SDGOP chair has already told them that he’s not going to be in attendance. So, if the officers don’t show up, how exactly do they intend to conduct business?

Beyond that, who is going to foot the bill for the meeting? I don’t recall renting the big room at Cedar Shores as being free? (Much less the pizza, understanding that committee members to provide their own for beverage(s)).  Not sure anyone on the list can incur bills for the State Republican Party.

But why do they even want a meeting for the sake of a meeting? If their goal is to ultimately stage some half-baked takeover of the party, I look at it a lot when I’m walking my overenthusiastic Corgi. She barks and yanks on the leash whenever a car goes by as I’m walking her.

What does she intend to do if I let the leash go, and she catches the car?  What happens if this group manages to take over a party that they’ve already hamstrung at this point?

The County groups certainly haven’t been honoring their quota arrangements with the SDGOP. So it’s not like they’ve been contributing and building a campaign kitty.

Many spend their time attacking or at least strongly chastising the top elected officials, such as Senators Thune and Rounds, Congressman Johnson, and Governor Noem. They’re certainly aren’t going to start sending them big fat checks. They can and will finance their own campaign operations.

The party has obligations and monthly expenses. What happens when the cash dries up? Which member of the rebel faction is going to step up and sign their name to a note like Craig Lawrence did way back when he was chair. He personally guaranteed that the SDGOP would have cash to operate until they could build things back up, which he did through the support of elected leaders. What about paying the up-front for big events? Dan Lederman fronted in the neighborhood of $60k on his credit cards for the benefit of the SDGOP during the last Sioux Falls Victory party. Who is going to do that?

If there’s some sort of half-baked coup, I’m sure everyone will move them to paying up front. And that’s money that’s not easy to come by, especially now when no one wants to donate to the SDGOP. Imagine it after that group takes over?

It’s all great and well to want to be in charge of the Republican Party. Except you have to be in charge. I’m sure Chairman Wiik would agree – It’s not winning the golden cup, it’s being the person who has the hot potato.

But, by all means, people who want to be in charge, call a meeting. And have fun with that.

Brookings County Democrats announce first replacement candidate

After dropping all three District 7 legislative candidates, Brookings County Dems have at least one replacement to fill their void on the November ballot.

According to Facebook reports, SDSU Student Blake Stevens who appears to have spent the last decade or so in Oregon will be running against Republican incumbent candidates Roger DeGroot & Mellissa Heermann in the D7 house race.

Viewing his profile on Linked In, Stevens describes himself as:

..a returning student at SDSU majoring in Political Science. My goal is to work in politics to help improve the lives of my fellow citizens. I want to focus mainly on civil rights and rebuilding communities to make them more friendly to people. I am very well versed in communication and am a very astute researcher. I believe with my current skill set I can get any legislation I desire to be at least considered on a state level.

My next few goals are to do well in school, get in better shape (recovering from covid) and to make new friends. I haven’t been back to the Midwest in almost 8 years so its time to reach out and meet some new faces.

Well, good luck with that.

Sturgis Man Sentenced to 65 Years in Prison After Conviction on 11 Counts of Felony Crimes Involving Children

Sturgis Man Sentenced to 65 Years in Prison After Conviction on 11 Counts of Felony Crimes Involving Children

PIERRE, S.D. – South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley announces that a Sturgis man has been sentenced to 65 years in prison after earlier being convicted of 11 counts of felony crimes involving five different children.

Lance Lowell Long, 40, was sentenced Monday in Corson County Circuit Court. He had been convicted in May by a Corson County Jury of one count of Second Degree Rape, one count of Third Degree Rape, one count of Fourth Degree Rape, three counts of Aggravated Assault, and five counts of Abuse of or Cruelty to a Minor.

The defendant was sentenced to 50 years in prison on the various rape and assault charges. He also was sentenced to 15 years in prison on the various child abuse charges, which will be served consecutively with the 50-year sentence.

Long had previously served time in prison for similar child abuse crimes that occurred in Minnehaha County. The Corson County case was prosecuted after the child victims disclosed the abuse to law enforcement in Sioux Falls.

The Corson County case was investigated by the South Dakota Division of Criminal Investigation (DCI). The Attorney General’s Office prosecuted the case.

“Our thoughts and support remain with these young victims,” said Attorney General Jackley. “This was a difficult case to investigate and prosecute, and thank you to those who worked on this case.”

 -30-

Conservative Religious lobbying group providing instruction on “Communicating with Gen Z.”

Hot off of the facebook press.. the South Central Republican Women will be hearing from Family Voice’s Norman Woods on “how to communicate with Gen Z.”

Why do I think it’s going to resemble this?

Presenter Norman Woods is also the only person to testify against a measure to establish the minimum age for marriage as 18.

Those darn kids and watching their Mtv..  Why aren’t they married off already?