Attorney General Jackley Confirms DCI Investigating Officer Involved Shootings in Sioux Falls

Attorney General Jackley Confirms DCI Investigating Officer Involved Shootings in Sioux Falls

PIERRE.S.D.  – South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley confirms that the Division of Criminal Investigation (DCI), at the request of the Sioux Falls Police Department and South Dakota Highway Patrol, is investigating two separate, but related, officer involved shootings with the same suspect that occurred Tuesday, April 1, 2025 in Sioux Falls.

One of the Officer Involved Shootings occurred in Sioux Falls and the other in Union County.

The suspect has been identified as Samir Albaidhani, 25, (Sha-mir All-Ba-Don-ee) who is in custody.

A Sioux Falls Police Officer and the suspect were both injured. The Highway Patrol Trooper was not injured.

Attorney General Jackley said that the DCI is working with the Beresford Police Department, Minnehaha County Sheriff’s Office, the Lincoln County Sheriff’s Office, and the Union County Sheriff’s Office on the investigations. The Sioux Falls Police Department and Highway Patrol are cooperating with the investigations.

“There is no further danger to the public based upon the strong response by local and state authorities,” said Attorney General Jackley. “DCI will do separate, but concurrent, investigations for each Officer Involved Shooting, and there will be additional criminal investigations.”

In both cases, the DCI will process the crime scene, conduct a forensic examination of all collected evidence, interview officers and witnesses, and review all video cameras from the area.

After the investigation are complete, the DCI will issue shooting summaries for both cases.

                                                                         -30-

Group led by new SD Freedom Caucus director, including Rep’s Schaefbauer, Jordan & Manhart advocate shooting planes down based on conspiracy theories

Uh, what? Unfortunately, it’s not an April Fools’ joke.

In case you haven’t read anything off-the-wall crazy today, a new group has been formed on Facebook, including several state legislators. And apparently, they want airplanes to be shot out of the sky:

South Dakotans Against Chem Trails” – This group is for South Dakotans who oppose the use of poisonous chemical trails in our skies and are committed to advocating for legislation that would obligate the National Guard to shoot down these poison pushing planes dispersing chem trails.

I think we’ve dipped into crazy town at this point. So, who is the group advocating that aircraft be shot down, which would likely kill the pilots and crew?

 

That would be the State Director of the South Dakota Freedom Caucus.  Along with some of her friends…

State Representative Dylan Jordan. State Representative Brandei Schaefbauer. State Representative Logan Manhart and State Senator Tom Pischke have all apparently clicked “Join Group” when presented with the manifesto that includes “obligate the National Guard to shoot down” airplanes.

ARE THEY KIDDING OR ARE THESE LEGISLATORS ACTUALLY THAT NUTS?

I have edited out most of the names, but J.F.C… we have 4 State Legislators advocating for airplanes to be shot out of the sky based on internet conspiracy theories?

Is this how bad some of our legislators have gotten?  Good gosh.

Release: Dakotans for Health Sues to Protect Voter Rights and Defend Direct Democracy

Dakotans for Health Sues to Protect Voter Rights and Defend Direct Democracy

South Dakota’s Continued Attempts to Undermine Citizen Initiatives Challenged in Court

Pierre, South Dakota – April 1, 2025 — Dakotans for Health and its Chair, Rick Weiland, today filed a legal challenge against Secretary of State Monae Johnson, seeking to prevent the enforcement of House Bill 1184, which severely limits the state’s citizen-initiated petition process. This new law is the latest in an ongoing effort by the Republican-dominated South Dakota legislature to undermine direct democracy and block the will of the voters.

“We believe in the power of the people, and the people of South Dakota have consistently used the initiative process to bring about important reforms, from healthcare access to minimum wage increases. This new law is just another effort to silence the voices of South Dakotans and deny them the right to make decisions that impact their lives,” said Rick Weiland, Chair of Dakotans for Health.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota, targets HB 1184, which moves the filing deadline for citizen petitions from the first Tuesday in May to the first Tuesday in Februaryshortening the time available for petition circulators to gather the necessary signatures. It also imposes additional challenges, including harsher winter conditions and decreased voter interest due to the far-removed election date.

The suit argues that HB 1184 violates the First Amendment by infringing on South Dakotans’ right to petition their government. The plaintiffs cite past rulings, including from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, which have consistently found that deadlines for citizen petitions should not be set too far in advance of an election, as it dilutes public participation and limits political speech.

“In a state where one political party controls every branch of government for more than three decades, the citizens’ right to initiate change has never been more important. The legislature’s move to roll back the petition filing deadline is a direct attempt to make it harder for everyday South Dakotans to propose changes to the laws that affect them,” said Weiland.

House Bill 1184, enacted as part of a series of legislative restrictions on the citizen initiative process, is part of an ongoing pattern where the South Dakota Legislature has repeatedly sought to restrict or undermine voters’ ability to directly change state law. These efforts include recent battles over petition circulation rules and campaign finance laws that infringe upon the First Amendment.

The plaintiffs, Dakotans for Health, are fighting to preserve a system that allows voters to have a direct say in their state’s laws. In 2024, they successfully submitted over 54,000 signatures for a constitutional amendment aimed at restoring Roe v. Wade rights for South Dakota women. Their work, alongside other organizations, is being undermined by HB 1184, which shortens the critical window in which petition drives can gather signatures.

The case also highlights the practical challenges faced by petition circulators, who must gather tens of thousands of signatures in harsh weather conditions, while working within tight timeframes that diminish their chances for success. According to the plaintiffs, reducing the time available to circulate petitions makes it less likely that any petition will gather enough valid signaturesdiscouraging future citizen engagement and activism.

“We are asking the court to protect the right of South Dakotans to engage in direct democracy by issuing an injunction to stop the enforcement of HB 1184. If this law is allowed to stand, it will severely restrict our ability to gather the signatures needed to bring important issues before voters. The people of South Dakota deserve better,” Weiland concluded.

Dakotans for Health and Rick Weiland are seeking both a preliminary and permanent injunction to block the enforcement of the law and protect the First Amendment rights of South Dakota’s citizens.

Attachments:

Full copies of the federal lawsuit and the legal memo for injunction are available on our website. Just scroll to the bottom of the page and you’ll see two downloadable PDF files:

  • Dakotans for Health et al. v. Monae Johnson – Complaint
  • Memo in Support of Preliminary and Permanent Injunction

Website: https://www.dakotans4health.com/post/dakotans-for-health-sues-south-dakota-over-hb-1184-attack-on-voter-rights

###

Thune, Baldwin, Johnson Reintroduce Legislation to Protect U.S. Dairy Producers

Thune, Baldwin, Johnson Reintroduce Legislation to Protect U.S. Dairy Producers 

WASHINGTON — U.S. Sens. John Thune (R-S.D.) and Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) and U.S. Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.) today led a bipartisan, bicameral group of lawmakers in reintroducing the Safeguarding American Food and Export Trade Yields (SAFETY) Act, legislation to protect American food products from unfair trade practices by foreign countries.

“For decades, global competitors have tried to limit competition, block imports, and restrict American-made products from being able to use common food and beverage names by exploiting valid geographical indication protections,” said Thune. “I’m proud to lead this effort in the Senate to help level the playing field for South Dakota producers by ensuring they can use common food names and preserve and expand foreign market access for their products.”

“Our Made in Wisconsin agricultural and food products are rightfully world-renowned for their quality, putting our state on the map and supporting countless jobs,” said Baldwin. “But, when foreign countries penalize our producers for using common names like ‘parmesan’ or ‘cheddar,’ their unfair trade practices hurt Made in Wisconsin businesses, our economy, and our workers. I’m proud to stand up for our local meat and cheese producers and make sure they can sell their products across the globe and keep supporting good paying jobs.”

“Fair trade agreements and practices are necessary to ensure American agriculture products have access to global markets,” said Johnson. “The European Union’s actions to prohibit the use of common food names for U.S. producers is confusing for consumers and costly to producers and manufacturers. The Safeguarding American Food and Export Trade Yields Act ensures American producers retain vital access to foreign markets in a time that may be more critical than ever.”

“Unfair trade practices imposed by foreign competitors have put U.S. dairy farmers at a competitive disadvantage by falsely protecting common names, especially for cheese varieties,” said Marv Post, chair of the South Dakota Dairy Producers. “With roughly one in six tankers of U.S. milk exported, fair treatment in a global market is critical. We applaud Senator Thune and Representative Johnson for leading this legislation that takes a big step forward to combat the abuse of common names so that U.S. dairy exports have a level playing field and access to all key international markets.”

“Losing the right to use common names has direct, on-the-ground consequences for U.S. dairy farmers,” said Gregg Doud, president and CEO of the National Milk Producers Federation. “We appreciate Senators Thune, Baldwin, Marshall and Smith and Representatives Johnson, Costa, Fischbach and Panetta taking up this fight. U.S. producers deserve fair competition. The SAFETY Act is an important milestone to making that a reality.”

“When the EU restricts our ability to market and sell our cheeses using ‘parmesan,’ ‘feta,’ and ‘asiago,’ it costs U.S. dairy producers markets and consumers that our members have built up over years,” said Krysta Harden, president and CEO of the U.S. Dairy Export Council. “It is past time that the U.S. government take a more proactive approach to tackling this challenge. A new emphasis on common name protections – headlined by the SAFETY Act – will ensure that our producers can compete on a more level playing field around the world. Thank you to Senators Thune, Baldwin, Marshall and Smith and Representatives Johnson, Costa, Fischbach and Panetta for leading this important effort.”

“For years, many foreign countries have succumbed to the EU pressures to exploit geographical indication rules to confiscate common food and beverage names that American and foreign producers in the new world have used for generations,” said Jaime Castaneda, executive director of the Consortium for Common Food Names. “This lack of action has cost U.S. producers too much for too long. The Safeguarding American Food and Export Trade Yields Act is a critical step toward ensuring that American producers can count on their government to establish a policy of fairness in the global market. We thank Senators Thune, Baldwin, Marshall and Smith and Representatives Johnson, Costa, Fischbach and Panetta for their steadfast support.”

Common food and drink names such as parmesan, chateau, and bologna are used around the world to describe products to consumers. However, due to geographic indication to European locations, the European Union has begun using economic and political influence to implement unfair trade practices under the guise of protecting geographic indicators. These unfair trade practices have the potential to block United States agricultural products from being sold in international markets.

This bill would amend the Agriculture Trade Act of 1978 to include and define a list of common names for ag commodities, food products, and terms used in marketing and packaging of products. The bill would also direct the secretary of agriculture and the U.S. trade representative to negotiate with our foreign trading partners to defend the right to use common names for ag commodities in those same foreign markets.

In addition to Thune, Baldwin, and Johnson, the legislation is cosponsored by U.S. Sens. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) and Tina Smith (D-Minn.), and U.S. Reps. Jim Costa (D-Calif.), Michelle Fischbach (R-Minn.), and Jimmy Panetta (D-Calif.).

###

Thune: Democrats Want to Raise Taxes … And That’s No Joke

Thune: Democrats Want to Raise Taxes … And That’s No Joke

“[W]e are hopeful that this week we can get a budget resolution on the floor that will unlock the process that’ll enable us to achieve and to reach those goals, and so we are continuing to move forward with that.”

WASHINGTON — U.S. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) today spoke at a press conference with Senate Republican leadership:

Has anyone checked on grandpa? @SDGOP’s communications seem to have gone silent

Uh oh.. we haven’t heard from grandpa in quite a while… do we need to send a neighbor over, and make sure he isn’t dead? Unfortunately, it seems like that’s the situation we’re in with the South Dakota Republican Party nowadays.

I know the new people in charge of the South Dakota Republican Party who took over on February 3rd, including new Republican Party chairman Jim Eschenbaum expressed that they were going to improve party communications ..and the website ..and everything! But, as the people who brought home the new puppy quickly find out, it’s cute in the beginning, but the dog takes a lot more work than just saying “I got a puppy.”

As I was doing a scan of what’s new and what’s going on in politics, I couldn’t help but notice that it seems nothing is actually being communicated out of the state’s flagship political party. Really, nothing at all. Which has me checking on grandpa to make sure we don’t have to call the coroner.

Last Facebook post: 

Dated March 11. 21 days ago.

Last tweet: 

Dated Feb 20. 40 days ago

40 days since a blurb on twitter? Over 20 days since a facebook update? State Democrats had 18 posts to Facebook in last 2 weeks, and just as many tweets, if not more. What is the Republican Party actually doing at this point? Anything?

If you look on the State GOP’s website, the new establishment has managed to replace the chairman’s picture. And if you really dig, you can find five or six Republican Dinners posted. Which isn’t anywhere as extensive or complete as the calendar of events from the SD Federation of Republican Women auxiliary to the SDGOP.

If you’re an organization that claims to be active and communicating, having a nearly un-navigable website and going radio silent for 20 and 40 days or more at a time, you are not a group that actually is active or communicating. It’s the opposite.

And even worse – has anyone seen a financial appeal from the Republican Party in the 60 days since this new group has taken over? I heard reports that after the Teenage Republicans and College Republicans have separated their finances from the party at large, leaving the State GOP which was holding those funds with around $13k to conduct their activities.

I know legislative candidates who have more than that in the bank right now, today.

If you are supposed to be a functioning statewide organization and you have no money, are raising no money, you have no staff, and there are no communications, are you really a functioning statewide organization at this point?

Or are you just a fossilized remnant left over from an organization which once dominated South Dakota politics?

Guest Column: Decriminalization A Step In The Wrong Direction by Representative Mary J Fitzgerald, District 31

Decriminalization A Step In The Wrong Direction
by Representative Mary J Fitzgerald, District 31

Effective July 1, 2025, Senate Bill 83 will decriminalize the use of controlled substances like fentanyl, fentanyl mixed with xylazine-the so-called zombie drug, heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine, PCP, and all other dangerous drugs. This is why I voted against the bill. It is not good for our children, and it is not good for South Dakota.

Effective July 1, the new law reduces the penalty from a felony to a misdemeanor for those convicted of ingesting dangerous drugs. This approach may encourage some offenders to swallow dangerous drugs when they are encountered by law enforcement to avoid a felony possession charge and significantly increase the risk of overdose. The change in this law in South Dakota will have negative consequences and will not deter this crime.

More significantly, individuals can be convicted for using dangerous drugs a number of times before the crime is a felony conviction and even then, it’s a probationary offense. First and second offenses will be a misdemeanor charge. Third and fourth offenses are felony charges but under our law the offender is still eligible for a deferred imposition of sentence, and/or a suspended imposition of sentence. Under a deferred imposition of sentence, if the offender completes probation for one year without violation the charge is reduced to a misdemeanor. Under a suspended imposition of sentence if the probationer is successful on probation the charges are dismissed, the file sealed, and the felony conviction is erased.

Potentially, by the time it becomes a fifth offense, the offender will be become a convicted felon. But the crime is then reduced from a Class 5 felony to a Class 6 felony, the lowest grade felony in South Dakota. Under our law, a Class 6 felon is still entitled to a presumption of probation and offenders will not serve time in prison but will receive probation. Decriminalizing drugs does little to deter drug use and it does nothing to stop offenders from using drugs.

Addictive drugs and substances that are outlawed are outlawed for good reasons because there is a link between drug use, health problems and crime. Crimes like theft, forgery, robberies and burglaries are linked to drug abuse. The new more powerful methamphetamine produced by the cartels is linked to psychosis and can result in schizophrenia. The use of fentanyl-xylazine combination is linked to severe wounds including necrosis that may lead to amputations. Fentanyl and heroin overdoses and deaths continue to rise.

A quick look at other states, such as Oregon, proves that the decriminalization approach is not effective. Oregon was the first state in the nation to decriminalize small possession amounts of dangerous drugs. But Oregon reversed its decision in September 2024, after noting increases in crime, homelessness and the deterioration of families. Oregon now serves as an example that decriminalizing is not the way to reduce drug abuse.

Senate Bill 83 undermines the work at the border. We are trying to stop drugs from entering the United States. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel, under the direction of President Trump, are working tirelessly to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the United States. The FBI reports that fentanyl and other illegal narcotics are killing an American citizen every seven minutes. Now is not the time to decriminalize drugs.

Reducing this crime from a felony to a misdemeanor is a ploy. It was sold to the legislature as a way to reduce prison population. But it will do little to reduce incarceration rates. There is nothing wrong with our current law. We already have two forms of leniency in place—a suspended imposition of sentence and a deferred imposition of sentence. A felony conviction is only handed down after multiple, deliberate violations of the law and probation violations. This ensures that individuals have ample opportunity to change their behavior before facing a felony conviction.

.

Gov Rhoden signs bill to improve funding for Tech Schools

From Twitter:

Attorney General Jackley, AG Coalition Asks Trump Administration To Close Loophole Used For Fentanyl Shipments

Attorney General Jackley, AG Coalition Asks Trump Administration To Close Loophole Used For Fentanyl Shipments

 PIERRE, S.D. – South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley has joined 25 other Attorneys General in asking the Trump Administration to close a loophole used by drug traffickers to ship Fentanyl into the United States.

South Dakota law enforcement at all levels seized 18.2 pounds of Fentanyl in 2024, enough to cause the death of every South Dakotan four or five times over,” said Attorney General Jackley. “We need the Trump Administration’s help to stop Fentanyl from coming across our borders and into our states.”

In a letter to U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security (DHS) Kristi Noem and Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Pete Flores, the Attorneys General call for greater scrutiny of an import pilot program called Entry Type 86, which allows small packages to enter the U.S. with minimal customs screening. The Attorneys General are concerned that the program is being used to ship Fentanyl into the United States.

Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman sent the letter along with Attorneys General from the states of Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming.

The letter can be found here:

-30-