A few more details on the upcoming ballot measure to limit legislative ability to change referred measures. Plus, how the AG reviews measures.

I had further conversation yesterday with Doug Kronaizl regarding his proposed measure to “enable voters to responsibly refer any laws passed by the legislature and limit legislative overreach…”, and he was kind enough to provide a few more details while the Attorney General reviews the language that was originally submitted for review:

The idea stems from some of the activity during the past legislative session regarding the process. I’m of the same opinion as Governor Janklow in that we are fortunate to be able to have such in-depth, statewide discussions on specific issues important to the voters and thus I felt compelled to maintain its accessibility and work towards its viability. The broadening aspect isn’t actually intended for the initiative process (I understand how the wording might imply that) nor is it an effort to lower signature counts or anything like that. Instead, it’s partly an effort to rid the referral process of loopholes, by which the Legislature can enact un-referable laws.

Doug also tells me that his effort is currently a solo effort, noting “No organizations are backing/funding the measure, although I am open to support from any like-minded individuals across the state. It’s all very grassroots – just an interested South Dakotan at work.”

When will we see the measure? Well, it could be a little while, as the AG is working on it along with several other proposals.

I spoke with Attorney General Jackley yesterday, who was kind enough to provide a bit more detail on what the AG review actually entails.  No, it’s not just in a pile on his desk, tucked inbetween Annette Bosworth and Clayton Walker.

There’s a very deliberative process which I think I’d find fascinating to listen to the give and take on. Marty tells me:

The process we undertake has been developed by previous Attorneys General, we form a committee made up of 3 to 5 attorneys with specialty in the area of law; the committee prepares recommendations to me for the language along with any legal issues; I then review it and meet with the committee for questions, changes, or additional research; then I make the final decision on the language for the public’s consideration.

Given that he’s dealing with goofy proposals this year such as outlawing Tobacco & Alcohol, I’m sure there’s a whole body of law that must be reviewed and discussed.

But, that’s what I know.  Stay tuned to SDWC for more on ballot measures as they arise!