Category: Uncategorized

Sharing with you a note I received from State Representative Greg Jamison announcing a forum (open to the public) being held tomorrow:

I’m putting together a Safer Sioux Falls Forum on July 22nd, 10:00 am at the Pavilion in the Belbas Theater.

All local law enforcement agencies, DOC Parole Manager, UJS, Minnehaha County States Attorney, Assistant Attorney General, city council leadership and council members, mayor, police chief Minnehaha and Lincoln County sheriffs are all participating.  All Sioux Falls legislators have been invited and many are attending.

The intent of the Safer Sioux Falls forum is to address issues that have been raised about having a prison in our city.

The first question is to the mayor/police chief about what impacts they feel from having a prison here.

If potential positive outcomes/funding… can be found that we support, my hope is that we could bring them to our special session and have them considered as part of the action we take.

The 22nd was chosen because it works with the mayor/police chief and sheriff first, but also because the 22nd was set aside for our special session.

We should be done by 11:30 am.

Jamison is viewed as a potential candidate for mayor of Sioux Falls, and has been participating as part of the Prison Reset task force.

While the SDGOP reported raising a whole $85 dollars in June (and anecdotally is said to have claimed ignorance about what they raised in June at the central committee meeting yesterday), the South Dakota Democrat Party filed a federal report showing that they raised nearly 1000 times as much.

SDDP July Monthly FEC by Pat Powers on Scribd

Democrats reported $79,326.04 raised, against $95,589.00 spent, leaving $57,914.10 cash on hand.  I would venture that this is as generated in part by their recent state dinner.

You know, I’m not sure what to say about the fundraising disparity.  Except the SDGOP should have fessed up at the Central Committee meeting, because that report didn’t appear out of thin air early this AM.

The South Dakota Republican Party held out until the very last day, today, to file their July federal elections commission monthly report. And for good reason.

The Republican Party Central committee met yesterday in Pierre, and this is information that they very likely did not want to discuss. The amount they are reporting as having raised in June to the FEC? A whopping $85.

That’s not $85,000. Or even $8500. $85. Less than most people‘s trip to a grocery store.

That’s even worse than last month, when the states majority political party raised an embarrassing $700.

Added to their $85 of effort, another $270 came in for refunds from the post office. Against this fundraising total, the SDGOP managed to spend $6079.

This is not a sustainable model.

Hot off the press:

Apparently, X-senator Julie Fry Mueller’s husband is running for the open seat on the South Dakota Republican Party executive board vacated by Ezra Hays recently.

Mueller, if you recall, was part of his wife’s ’breastfeeding scandal,’ and was in the closed room as all of it was going on with the legislative employee:

The unnamed staff member said in written testimony that Frye-Mueller and her husband, Mike Mueller, came into her office last week to discuss a bill. The senator asked the staff member about her child and if she had vaccinated her child. When she said ‘yes,’ Frye-Mueller pointed her finger at the staff “aggressively” and told her “it would cause issues,” according to the testimony.

Frye-Mueller then asked the staff member if she was breastfeeding, the staff member said. When the staff member said she was using formula, Frye-Mueller began describing how she could breastfeed.

“She proceeded to provide hand gestures to her chest area and motion to her husband to see if he agreed,” the staff member said in her testimony. “He smiled and nodded.”

Read the entire story here.

Do we have someone to serve on the state Republican Party Executive Board who hasn’t been in the middle of a legislative scandal telling an employee how to breast-feed?

The Julian Beaudion for US Senate campaign has launched, and according to the first FEC report that has been filed, the fledgeling Democrat Senate campaign is doing marginally better than the Brian Bengs (I) campaign for the same race.

JULIAN FOR U.S. SENATE July 2025 FEC by Pat Powers on Scribd

Beaudion raised a total of $85,413.40 in his first quarter (Compared to Bengs’ $77,542.44). I make this comparison, as both the Democrat and the Independent are raising money through ActBlue, the Democrat fundraising platform.

Beaudion had a lower burn rate than Bengs, only spending $41,688.46, leaving him $43,724.94 cash on hand, compared to Bengs ending up with $16k after spending $60k.

The question is whose approach is better? Spending more to get geared up for the campaign, or banking as much as possible?  Beaudion will have access to Democrat campaign money from the national level is he can get a credible campaign pulled together by the end of the year… And he may have access to it anyway, “just because” Democrats want to throw rocks at Republican in the majority leader’s own state.

Keep on watching as things develop in the months to come.

Gov. Rhoden Announces Prison Special Session on September 23

PIERRE, S.D. –  Today, Governor Larry Rhoden announced the date of the special session to consider and pass legislation for a new prison. The special session will be on Tuesday, September 23, 2025, at 9:00 am CT. Governor Rhoden signed an Executive Proclamation formally announcing the special session. You can read his letter to the legislature, which includes the Executive Proclamation, here.

“When we started this process, we knew that we needed to build consensus on a plan that a supermajority of the legislature can agree on, and I believe that we are in good shape to achieve that,” wrote Governor Larry Rhoden. “The purpose of this session shall be to consider and pass legislation to authorize the Department of Corrections to do everything necessary to move forward with this project.”

Lt. Governor Tony Venhuizen, who chaired the prison task force, also wrote a letter to Governor Rhoden on the task force’s findings. You can find that letter here.

“We understood that compromise was necessary to reach a recommendation that can win [the Governor’s] support and the support of the legislature,” wrote Lt. Governor Tony Venhuizen. “The task force’s unanimous vote for its recommendation demonstrates that we have found a good site f0r a new penitentiary and a strong path forward.”

The prison task force was announced by Governor Larry Rhoden in February. They were tasked with answering three questions:

• Do we need a new prison?
• How big should it be?
• Where should it go?

The prison task force came to unanimous agreement on all three of these questions.

The special session is called pursuant to Article IV, Section 3 of the South Dakota Constitution.

###

Johnson Votes to Protect Americans’ Financial Privacy

 Washington, D.C. – U.S. Representative Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.) voted to pass the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act to prohibit a central bank digital currency (CBDC) and protect the financial privacy of all Americans.

“A central bank digital currency allows governments to track purchases of its users – this is wholly un-American,” said Johnson. “Countries like China utilize a central bank digital currency to punish and reward their citizens – we should not be taking any tips from the Chinese Communist Party’s playbook. I’m glad the House passed the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act to protect the financial privacy and freedoms of Americans.”

Background:

Unlike decentralized digital assets, CBDCs are digital forms of sovereign currency issued and controlled by the federal government, with transactions occurring on a government-managed ledger. In short, a CBDC is government-controlled programmable money that, if not designed to mimic cash, could provide the federal government with detailed transaction data on individual users and the ability to program the CBDC to suppress politically unpopular activities.

In March 2022, then-President Biden issued an executive order urging for CBDC research and development. The corresponding report made it clear that the Biden Administration was not only wanting to create a CBDC, but they are willing to trade Americans’ right to financial privacy for a surveillance-style CBDC.

President Trump issued an executive order prohibiting federal agencies from pursuing a CBDC. The Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act codifies President Trump’s executive order, permanently banning their development, so future administrations cannot weaponize this technology against Americans.

Specifically, the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act:

• Prohibits the Federal Reserve from issuing a CBDC directly to individuals, ensuring the Federal Reserve can’t mobilize itself into a retail bank with the ability to collect personal financial data on Americans.
• Prohibits the Federal Reserve from indirectly issuing a CBDC to individuals through an intermediary or third party.
• Prohibits the Federal Reserve from using a CBDC as a tool to implement monetary policy.
• Requires authorizing legislation from Congress for the issuance of any CBDC.
• Protects innovation that reflects American values.

###

From the Argus Leader, a group fighting the Sioux Falls School District opt-out might need some remedial math after they turned in about half of the signatures needed to bring the action to a public vote:

District community relations coordinator DeeAnn Konrad said the group submitted 2,302 unverified signatures by the 5 p.m. deadline on July 17, well short of the required amount of 5,490 signatures, or of the group’s initial goal of 6,500 signatures.

and..

The leader of the petition effort, Misty Furness, didn’t immediately respond to the Argus Leader’s request for an interview at the time of publication.

Furness did speak with conservative political group Patriot Ripple Effect’s members in a meeting publicized in her opt-out Facebook group and on the conservative group’s Facebook page, but reporters from the Argus Leader and Sioux Falls Live were barred from attending this meeting.

Read that here in the Argus Leader.

You can also read this from the leader of the petition effort, Misty Furness:

You can see that here.

Maybe that’s one reason the group was challenged to get people to sign…

COMMUNITY SUPPORT PROVIDERS INTERIM COMMITTEE TO MEET

PIERRE – The Community Support Providers, State and Federal Efficiencies Interim Committee will hold its second meeting of the 2025 Interim on Wednesday, July 23, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. (CT). The meeting is being conducted in Room 414 of the State Capitol in Pierre, South Dakota.

The Community Support Providers, State and Federal Efficiencies Interim Committee, co-chaired by Representative Leslie Heinemann (R-Flandreau) and Senator Chris Karr (R-Sioux Falls), will meet to receive information on conflict- free case management organizations; and discuss potential efficiencies regarding accreditation and state policy reviews, conflict-free case management, day services payment models, and a standardized documentation system for CSPs and case managers. Public comments will also be accepted. The full agenda is available online.

In addition to Representative Heinemann and Senator Karr, members include Representatives Heather Baxter (R-Rapid City), Brian Mulder (R-Sioux Falls), Nicole Uhre-Balk (D-Rapid City), and Richard Vasgaard (R-Centerville); and Senators Liz Larson (D-Sioux Falls), Lauren Nelson (R-Yankton), and Mykala Voita (R-Bonesteel).

-30-

Fiscal Strength
By: Gov. Larry Rhoden
July 18, 2025

South Dakota’s pretty darn special. What other state has the lowest unemployment rate in America, the 2^nd best overall tax system, the 2^nd least regulations, no income tax, a AAA credit rating, a fully-funded pension, and 136 consecutive years of balanced budgets? Very few states can boast even one such accolade – and no other state can boast all of them together!

Our state is a model of fiscal strength, and I will keep it that way for as long as I am Governor.

We just ended another fiscal year when the calendar turned to July, and despite a tighter budget than usual, South Dakota ended the fiscal year in strong shape. All those accolades remain true, and we delivered a $63 million operating surplus, to boot.

Since we announced our year end surplus, South Dakota has been criticized by some who say that we should have spent more money on this handout or that pet project. But I’m glad we didn’t, and I’ll explain why by digging a bit more into the particulars of the surplus.

Yes, we finished the year $63 million up – and that was driven in part by state agencies spending $22 million less than what they were budgeted. That’s just good, commonsense decision making from the leaders of our agencies. They didn’t spend more than what they were allocated, and they looked for opportunities to save. If every state and Washington, DC, did business that way, our country would be a lot better off.

Our revenues also came in $41 million above what was budgeted, but that was driven by unexpected $47 million in additional unclaimed property receipts this spring. Starting this new fiscal year, all such receipts in the future will be put into a new Unclaimed Property Trust Fund, which I signed into law this past session. That’s a complicated way of saying this: we won’t be able to depend on those dollars in the same way going forward.

We came into this last legislative session knowing that we had a bit of a budget pinch. Then-Governor Noem recommended $80 million in cuts, and I stood by those. The legislature passed $70 million of those cuts but added none of their own. So, we did have to cut to get to where we’re at today. That’s how South Dakota families balance their budgets, and that’s how our leaders do business in Pierre.

For those who wish that we would’ve spent more, I won’t apologize for making fiscally conservative decisions as your Governor. South Dakota is a leader in disciplined financial management. No other state can boast of all the accolades that I listed earlier, so we shouldn’t start doing business like other states.

As long as I am your Governor, we will continue to be careful stewards of taxpayer dollars by making wise long-term investments, maintaining conservative fiscal policies, and only spending within our means. I’ll keep making financial decisions the same way going forward – after all, this approach has served South Dakota well for the last 136 years.

###