Related to yesterday’s story on Toby Doeden of Aberdeen running polling and announcing that he’s exploring a run for Congress, out of curiosity, I visited the website for the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) to re-check at what threshold that people looking at running for federal office can spend before they actually have to file. And I discovered a distinction that I don’t think I’d read before on the FEC website. As noted:
Before deciding to campaign for federal office, an individual may want to “test the waters” to explore the feasibility of becoming a candidate. For example, an individual may want to conduct polls or travel around the state or district to see if there is sufficient support for their candidacy.
An individual who merely tests the waters, but not to campaign for office, does not have to register or report to the FEC. This is the case even if the funds raised and spent to test the waters exceed the $5,000 candidate registration threshold.
and..
After exceeding the threshold, the individual must register with the FEC as a candidate, designate and register a principal campaign committee, and begin to file reports. The first report must include all activity that occurred during the testing the waters period.
Now here’s a caveat that I hadn’t noticed in prior years..
Testing the waters vs. campaigning
An individual may carry out a variety of activities to test the waters. Examples of permissible testing the waters activities include conducting polling, traveling and making telephone calls to determine whether the individual should become a candidate.
Campaigning
Certain activities, however, indicate an individual has decided to become a candidate and is no longer testing the waters. In that case, once the individual has raised or spent more than $5,000, the individual must register as a candidate. As mentioned earlier, when an individual decides to run for office, funds that were raised and spent to test the waters apply to the $5,000 threshold.
Campaigning (as opposed to testing the waters) is apparent, for example, when:
-
Make or authorize statements that refer to themselves as candidates (“Smith in 2024” or “Smith for Senate”);
-
Use general public political advertising to publicize their intention to campaign;
Accompanying the polling that Doeden did was a hit-piece video that his committee produced. And now there is a website that is on the Internet, with examples that seem to skirt the guidance being provided by the Federal Elections Commission..
“Help the Toby for Congress campaign” would certainly seem to be “statements that refer to ones’ self as a candidate.” Not to mention appear to be general public political advertising that publicizes his intention to campaign.
Of course he did, but as a narcissist he is sure he is above any law meant for the peasants.
Opens up all kinds of questions. A deeper look needs to be made into COVID funds he got and how it was spent.
How many TIFs did he apply for and secure from the City of Aberdeen? 1? 2?
100% right, Pat!!
Sounds like the establishment does not want him to run?
Right? We don’t even know who he is and now we are seeing people commenting about TIFs and covid funds. Somebody’s doing deep dive research.
If a potential opponent runs an exploratory committee I would want it to stay an exploratory committee. No need to drag a guy looking for a fight and worth tens of millions of dollars into a race.
I would leave that one alone and deal with him if he actually declares or gets on the ballot.
This comment is laughable. People worth “tens of millions” don’t run for Congress.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/wealthiest-members-congress-house-senate-finances-2021-12%3famp
More like load round in chamber, turn safety off, aim at his right foot and pull trigger. Repeat, switch aim and shoot left foot. Continue to repeat actions to the shock, disgust and anger of local business owners and citizens of the area. One thing this guy has accomplished over time is unite many that are opposed to him no matter their politics. He would make a great future case study being an example of what not to do out of pure ego driven stupidity at a University.
Looks to me like throw a 100% polyester plaid sport coat on him and he would fit in perfectly at some seedy stereotypical used car lot that would say and claim anything to make a sale.
Is he delusional? Best he does is about 12% if it’s a crowded field.