Guest Column: Update on the Implementation of IM-26

Update on the Implementation of IM-26
by State Rep. Trish Ladner

Many have contacted me asking where we stand on the implementation of IM-26. As many of you know IM-26 passed with 70% approval by the voters. The measure is effective July 1, 2021 with a 120-day window to get dispensaries set up, finalize protocols and rules. Perhaps the most timely and informative report of the day came from the Kim Malsam-Rysdon, Secretary of Health and Jim Terwilliger, Secretary of Revenue regarding where we are in the process of establishing the protocols, requirements, and implementation of IM-26.

Here is what we learned. The South Dakota Department of Health (SDDOH) is the lead state agency to implement the medical marijuana program. Part of the extensive requirements IM-26 (per SDCL 34:20G) include:

  • Registration of “establishments”, which includes cultivators, manufacturers, and dispensaries
  • The development of criteria for applicants to qualify
  • Determine and define the amount individuals can possess (the current law has minimum of three plants for home grown)
  • Issuance of cards by SDDOH to qualified individuals (including patients and caregivers)
  • Guidelines to allow non-residents to use medical marijuana in South Dakota
  • Development of patient verification system for use by establishments and law enforcements (i.e., It is illegal to transport across state and tribal lines)
  • Development of testing criteria
  • Development of fees and sliding fee scale for patients
  • Implementation of administrative rules for each of these areas.

According to the SDDOH report, the law will become effective July 1,2021. The projected date for cards to be issued to patients and caregivers is by November 18, 2021. South Dakotan grown marijuana crops are not likely to be available before the summer of 2022.

The process to qualify for a SDDOH issued card, seems pretty straight forward: 1) The patient has a medical complaint and schedules appointment with their physician for an in-person assessment (required)  2) The patient sees their physician and the physician determines whether the patient is likely to receive therapeutic benefit from the medical use of cannabis 3) Patient applies with the SD Department of Health for a medical certification 4) If application is approved, the patient shops at Dispensary. The card issued by the DOH is not a medical prescription. It does not detail dosage, frequency, etc. It is simply a medical certification. When the members of the Executive Board asked about monitoring and/or enforcing the regulation of frequency that a card holder can obtain medical marijuana, the Secretary of Health stated that they hope to have a tracking/verification system in place that tracks the amount purchased and notes an amount that cannot be exceeded within a specific timeframe. Much like the prescription renewal used by pharmacy’s today.

When implementing a new “industry”, the administrative rules that need to be in place are daunting to say the least. The list includes (but not limited to), outlining qualifying conditions, application renewal process, criteria to score establishment applications, establishment of oversight, security, manufacturing standards, taxing the product, health and safety requirements, transportation of product, employment and training requirements, packaging and labeling and more!

In order to get current information and updates to interested parties in a timely manner, the SD Department of Health has launched a new webpage for easy access to information and updates as well as answers to frequently asked questions that promises to be very helpful. Please visit https://doh.sd.gov/news/MedicalMarijuana.aspx for more information.

The more I study IM-26, the more I realize the immense task ahead of us with a very short amount of time to accomplish it. This new “industry” being created within our state is definitely a multi-faceted issue with many, many moving and interlocking parts. I am so impressed with the hard work being done by those in the South Dakota Department of Health and Department of Revenue, as well as the excellent job that our summer study committee is doing to help create, establish and implement this new Medical Marijuana Program. Thank you for all your hard work on our behalf!

Remember … always, “Be someone you look up to!”  Emily N. Kansas

Rep. Trish Ladner, District 30
[email protected]

7 thoughts on “Guest Column: Update on the Implementation of IM-26”

  1. Thank you, but…

    I thought the majority of South Dakotans voted to legalize marijuana for anyone of age, by July 1st. I guess you can have it if you jump through a bunch of medical hoops and wait a year. That’s what our “representative” tells us.

    1. Go read IM 26. The deadlines she is talking about are all in IM 26. The law takes effect July 1 but then there is implementation time. Neither the legislature nor the Department of Health are delaying anything.

      1. My point is that we are not being represented. Amendment A should have made much of this moot. But you are right in that the amendment’s obstruction is mostly the governor’s doing.

        1. Amendment A wouldn’t have made any of this moot. The rules and regulations for medicinal would still need to be created and instituted even with amendment a.

          1. Do you go to your doctor for a prescription and then apply for a state issued card… to drink vodka?

            It wouldn’t eliminate the need for all regulations but of course Amendment A would make a difference. The majority voted for you to butt out of our lives. Why don’t you give it a try.

  2. I have to agree with you on that, elk. Gov. has stated she doesn’t know anybody that got smarter from using weed. Well, I don’t know anyone who got smarter from booze, tobacco or gambling but the state is first at the trough to get those those tax revenues. The voters approved A and 26 so step out of the way and quit using taxpayers money to fight laws approved by the people who pay your salaries.
    Remember, 50,000 more people voted for weed than the Gov.
    If the Dems had a real candidate, this could be a point to fight on but I doubt they can come up with any one.

  3. Getting blazed after sparking up a bowl and calling it medicine. Yep! Sure! Thanks Democrats and Libertarians!

Comments are closed.