I’m guessing Sen’s Pischke & Frye-Mueller aren’t going to be invited back to caucus anytime soon..

15 thoughts on “I’m guessing Sen’s Pischke & Frye-Mueller aren’t going to be invited back to caucus anytime soon..”

1. Two loser peas in a loser pod.

2. The more extreme the South Dakota legislature gets the better. Go Team Tide Pods!

   1. Nothing gets done at caucus anyway with the super majority and divisions within. What did they lose?

3. Keep going, morons. Just continuing to isolate yourselves.

4. It is not difficult to see who is the abuser and who is the victim.

   It is common knowledge among thugs and mafiosos that abusing one person in front of others will disincentive more dissent.

   1. “disincentive” should be “disincentivize”

      but you guys and gals are smart, and probably figured that out.

      1. Yeah we’re smart enough to see that JFM and Pischke are two individuals with stunted EQ and IQ.

5. better put this censure in a mason jar and preserve it for later.

   1. the flavor is fading fast

6. ok, so I can’t imagine someone making a motion and not having a second lined up in advance, and enough votes to carry it.
   So somebody is playing them, assuring them that if they bring it again, it will be seconded, and then voted for.
   They have been played three times now? Please tell us the rest of the story!

   1. they can’t put enough people into the house at once to make a difference, so i believe they want to carefully keep that ginned-up censure outrage flame burning in a bunch of senate primaries next year. just a guess. each district’s wingnut candidate will run against the whole senate of course.

      1. we’ll never see it coming lol

      2. I suppose if they can get a second and force a vote on it, they can mail out the postcards attacking everybody who votes against it. If they never get a second they won’t be able to mail out the attack postcards.

         1. no no no!! i need them to run on the failed motions! shhhhhb

            1. They don’t need an investigation into any of Schoenbeck’s public statements; we already know what he has said, and it’s not slander if it’s true.

               It is the wackadoodles’ responsibility to prove they are not wackadoodles by cleaning up their act.

               There would be great entertainment value in public committee hearings at which Schoenbeck could present evidence and testimony that the wackadoodles really are wackadoodles.

Comments are closed.