The Proud Boys providing security at South Dakota political gatherings isn’t going to be a thing, is it?

Have you ever seen something that you have difficulty putting in words a sense of something …being askew? The Stop the Steal rally in Sioux Falls last Saturday was unlike anything I’d ever seen before in politics over the past 30 some years.

As far as I can tell, the organizers of last Saturday’s event in Sioux Falls don’t have any ties to the SDGOP organization. According to the facebook page, there were just a few people who supported Trump and they organized the rally on their own.

This was a group gathered together with the notion that in some states there may have been some issues with balloting. (And, ok, that notion could be possible, but that’s really up to those individual states to police because we shouldn’t federalize our elections).

So here was this rally in Sioux Falls rallying over alleged balloting inconsistencies several states away.. with a paramilitary group speaking and providing security for the speakers at the stage.

I’ve been to a lot of political events in the last 30 years, and I can’t say that I’ve ever experienced one in Pierre, Sioux Falls, Rapid City or elsewhere where they felt the need to have an armed paramilitary force ring the speaker for security reasons for an outside gathering in a park bandshell in January.

It’s one of those things you look at… and go “what the **** is going on?” (insert your favorite declarative expression here)

At the political events I’ve attended, there have been plenty of pro-Second Amendment people. Some with guns, and on occasion, you’ll see a person is open carrying, but no big deal. It’s South Dakota, and fairly common. But never before have I been aware of a local political event where someone felt the need for security like this, as provided by “The Proud Boys,” who have been accused of promoting and engaging in political violence.

It’s not exactly a South Dakota nice image.

I mean, what if someone had shown up and started shouting or being a jerk? Would they have drawn on them? Nevermind that the local police were on the scene, so it’s not as if an official response was remote and untimely if someone was going to be a pain in the rear.

The organizers in the center certainly had no problem affiliating themselves with the Proud Boys, as you will note from the picture above with a few of them flashing a certain hand gesture.  However, while these organizers were ok with it, I don’t think any Republicans want that kind of image affiliated with the party, and I don’t think many local county GOP groups in Huron, Mobridge or Pukwana are interested in having a paramilitary group affiliated with them (as Antifa groups associate with the left) show up and ring the speaker at their dinners.

In the realm of politics, I believe there are 20% who are always with you, 20% who will never support you, making it your job to convince the 60% in the middle that you provide better leadership than the other person or group. So, when there’s a rally with that kind of imagery, it might make it more challenging to convince that 60% that you share their beliefs and gain their trust to lead South Dakota.  You actually have to convince the soccer moms and state workers to vote for you along with the local gun club members.

I have to believe that the need for this kind of thing in a Sioux Falls bandshell is as much an aberration as the attack on the US Capitol was yesterday.

Or at least, we can hope.

SD Libertarian Party Leadership on yesterday’s riots at the US Capitol, quickly disavowing some of the nuts in his organization.

So I’m sitting in the Dr’s office today waiting for a regular checkup when I get a text from Gideon Oakes, chair of the Libertarian Party.  In the note, Gideon wants to clarify:

“To be 100% clear, the Libertarian Party is the party of peace, and of principle. To join the national party, one must sign a pledge not to use force to achieve their political or social goals. The non-aggression principle is what binds all Libertarians together, and it is what drives our decisions and policy directives.”

And with that caveat, I question why he’s reaching out, and my thoughts immediately go to their communications director/ former PUC candidate Devin Saxon, or their East River Regional Coordinator/former Senate & momentary Gubernatorial candidate CJ Abernathey.

Because, of course.  Getting back to my desk, I see..

 

 

The Libertarian Party’s recent PUC Candidate Devin Saxon disagreeing with his national party, and agreeing with a nut who thinks there a constitutional right to overthrow the government.  And Libertarian Party’s “East River Regional Coordinator” being equally nutty and claiming that “the government started the violence” and that all of our elected officials should be charged with war crimes.

Brought to you by at least part of the Libertarian Party.

 

I get the feeling there was a lack of follow up after writing that letter.

Despite writing a letter to our federal delegation over their insistence that there must be some sort of issue with the November election, a couple of our State Representatives seemed a bit behind yesterday after the chaos at the US Capitol:

On Wednesday, reached by Forum News Service, the letter’s lead author, Rep. Elizabeth May of Kyle, said she condemned the mob violence in Washington, D.C. Pushed whether Congress should certify the Electoral College results today, something lawmakers say they intend to do, May demurred.

“Well, I’m not up-to-date,” May said. “I can’t make a comment on that. But the process needs to work its way through.”

South Dakota’s outgoing Speaker of the House Steven Haugaard, a Sioux Falls Republican who signed the letter and attended a protest airing election falsehoods in Sioux Falls over the weekend, was also reached by Forum News Service but declined any comment.

“I really haven’t followed the news enough to know what’s going on there,” Haugaard said. “I heard something about some issue in Washington. But not enough to make a comment.”

Read the entire story here in the Mitchell Republic.

Governor Noem still saying no to President in 2024

From the Argus Leader, Joe Sneve asks, and Governor Kristi Noem is still saying No to being a presidential candidate in 2024:

“No,” the governor said Wednesday afternoon after being asked if she will run for president in 2024, during a trip to Sioux Falls.  “I am focused on staying here in South Dakota.”

Up for re-election as governor in 2022, Noem’s remarks Wednesday echo similar responses she’s given in recent months. And last week, she said she’s not interested in challenging Thune for his seat in 2022, calling the Murdo native first elected to the U.S. Senate in 2004 a personal friend, and saying she will seek re-election of her own.

Read it here at the Argus.

(And I’m sure we’re going to keep hearing this in every other news story from now until then.)

Rounds: Violence and Destruction are Never the Answer

Rounds: Violence and Destruction are Never the Answer

WASHINGTON—U.S. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) made the following statement on today’s attack on the U.S. Capitol:

“As a nation, we should stand together in opposition to the violent acts and lawlessness that occurred at the U.S. Capitol today. Violence and destruction are never the answer. We are better than this, and it’s past time for cooler heads to prevail. I continue to pray for our great country.”

###