Senator John Thune Applauds Passage of Annual Defense Policy Bill, Ellsworth Air Force Base Priorities

Thune Applauds Passage of Annual Defense Policy Bill, Ellsworth Air Force Base Priorities

“[T]his bill strengthens the important role that South Dakota plays in keeping our nation safe by continuing to prepare Ellsworth Air Force Base for the arrival of the B-21 Raider and authorizing a new facility for the South Dakota Army National Guard in Watertown.”

WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) today issued the following statement after the Senate passed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2026, which includes significant provisions for Ellsworth Air Force Base, the forthcoming B-21 bomber mission, and the South Dakota Army National Guard in Watertown. The legislation also makes the most significant transformation of defense acquisition in decades to restock munitions, ensure warfighters have access to the best technology available, and advance the Golden Dome for America missile defense system to protect the United States. The bill now heads to the president’s desk to be signed into law.

“This year’s NDAA builds on the historic investments that Republicans delivered in the One Big Beautiful Bill to support our service members and ensure our country has the fighting force necessary to deter our adversaries and promote peace and stability,” said Thune.

“In addition to authorizing a well-deserved pay raise for our service members, this bill strengthens the important role that South Dakota plays in keeping our nation safe by continuing to prepare Ellsworth Air Force Base for the arrival of the B-21 Raider and authorizing a new facility for the South Dakota Army National Guard in Watertown,” Thune continued. “I’m pleased the Senate gave this important legislation the time and attention it deserves this year, and I’m glad we were able to get it across the finish line.”

The NDAA includes key priorities that will benefit South Dakota:

  • Fully authorizes the B-21 Raider program, including over $3.4 billion for procurement;
  • Authorizes $378 million in military construction projects to support the future B-21 Raider mission at Ellsworth Air Force Base;
  • Authorizes $28 million for a South Dakota Army National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop in Watertown;
  • Requires a “bomber roadmap” detailing bomber force structure, modernization, and transition plan for fielding the B-21;
  • Modifies the Defense Community Infrastructure Program to better address quality of life needs of military families;
  • Supports munitions production, leveraging South Dakota industries; and
  • Authorizes robust munitions production for the B-1 and B-21.

###

Mary J. Fitzgerald Launches Re-Election Campaign for District 31 House of Representatives

Mary J. Fitzgerald Launches Re-Election Campaign for District 31 House of Representatives

Saint Onge — Representative Mary J. Fitzgerald (R) announced today that she is running for re-election to the South Dakota House of Representatives, vowing to continue delivering results and standing up for the South Dakota values that matter most.

“Serving this community is an honor I never take for granted,” Fitzgerald said. “I’m committed to protecting our freedoms, supporting our families, and ensuring government works efficiently for the people of South Dakota.”

Known for her accessibility and no-nonsense approach, Fitzgerald has built a reputation for results-driven leadership. She has passed multiple pieces of legislation focused on public safety, government transparency, and protecting constitutional rights. Her work includes strengthening penalties for violent offenders, ensuring convictions for sexual assault cannot be erased, protecting Second Amendment rights for law-abiding gun owners, increasing transparency in public meetings, fixing inconsistencies in DUI laws, and safeguarding volunteers of nonprofit organizations.

Growing up on a South Dakota farm, Fitzgerald learned the value of hard work and the importance of community. She has been a consistent advocate for agriculture and rural communities, championing limited, accountable government and responsible budgeting. She has also supported strategic investments in infrastructure to keep communities and the economy strong. Reducing property taxes and cutting government spending remain top priorities in her next term. People are asking for help and Rep Fitzgerald hears their call and takes that responsibility seriously.

A firm supporter of education, Fitzgerald said: “Education is the greatest investment we can make in the future of our communities. When we give our youth the tools and opportunities to succeed, we create stronger economies and brighter futures.”

Fitzgerald previously served two years on House and Joint Appropriations and currently serves on House Judiciary and House Local Government. She holds a bachelor’s degree in accounting and business administration and lives in Saint Onge with her husband, John H. Fitzgerald, a 4th Circuit Court Judge. They have three grown children, all graduates of BHSU and the USD School of Law, and six grandchildren, all living in western South Dakota.

Fitzgerald is a former Vice-Chair of the South Dakota State Republican Party, former Lawrence County GOP Chair, and a member of the Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR). Rep. Mary Fitzgerald can be reached at 605.641.2045 or mary.fitzgerald@sdlegislature.gov. Fitzgerald is asking for your support on June 2nd in the Republican primary election. Voters can learn more by visiting her Facebook page or her website at Fitz4House.com.

Vote to dissolve Oldham-Ramona-Rutland School District vote currently tied.

Not sure anyone could have predicted this outcome. But the vote on whether or not to dissolve the Oldham-Ramona-Rutland School District, which would bus school children out of the area currently stands at a tie vote – 363 votes for and 363 votes against.   According to a story at KELOland.com:

The unofficial election results are in for the Oldham-Ramona-Rutland School District and there’s still not a complete answer on the future of the school district. With 363 votes for dissolving the district and 363 votes against dissolving the district and 5 provisional ballots cast, leaving the fate of the district unknown.

and..

According to a fact sheet from the ORR school district, if the district dissolves, there would be 42 employees who will be fired and 193 students that will have to go elsewhere for schooling. The sheet added that the board has canceled their current construction contract for $19 million that would have built a new school. The sheet also stated that no capital outlay certificates will be issued and no tax increase related to the construction is planned.

Read the entire story here.

(Maybe it’s a good time to re-watch Casey Phillips’ documentary about tie votes in elections; Win, Lose or Draw Straws.)

As we move into economic conditions that place us in danger of recession, it seems counter-productive for 3 small communities to ship their kids – nearly 200 of them – to larger towns for schooling, and to fire 42 employees.  For these communities that don’t consist of much, there’s a real danger that they’re soon going to consist of a lot less.

If they succeed in killing the local schools… well, if that happens, at least if Abby Bischoff ever decides she wants to fire back up her “Abandoned South Dakota” website and calendars, she’ll have plenty of new subjects to photograph.

Thune on a Year of Results: Safer Streets, More Money in Americans’ Pockets, New Opportunities

Thune on a Year of Results: Safer Streets, More Money in Americans’ Pockets, New Opportunities

“[W]e’ve had an incredibly productive session of this Congress as well, in terms of the things that we’ve accomplished to make America safer, stronger, and more prosperous.”

12/16  — U.S. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) today spoke at a press conference with Senate Republican leadership:

In the race to last place, Hansen for Governor campaign denies being in talks with Doeden for Governor campaign

After Toby Doeden got on the computer last night, and started tweeting like Darth Vader how Jon Hansen would be joining him…

\While I don’t know Jon well personally, our teams, along with many of our surrogates, have nothing but the greatest respect for each other.

Together, they have been in constant communication about the best way to integrate these two teams together.

All well intended members of the grassroots movement, including Jon, know that joining forces is the right thing to do.

Read that here.

.. but after posting a couple pictures of a fundraiser to show how many people didn’t show up, the Hansen for Governor campaign took to Facebook to refute the claim about them bending the knee:

Voters deserve more than people obsessed with money or power. They deserve more than people who pretend to be something that they are not in an attempt to manipulate the voters of South Dakota. They deserve more than those that preach unity on the right but do more to sow division amongst fellow conservatives.

and..

I am not backing down–we are not in talks to integrate our campaign with anyone else–and anybody who claims otherwise is not being honest with you.

If you’re inclined, you can read the whole thing here.

Glad they can provide entertainment in the form of a slappy fight on social media over which one of them gets to come in last.

Derby Announces State House 2026 Re-Election Bid

Derby Announces State House 2026 Re-Election Bid

Rep. Mike Derby today announces he is seeking re-election for State Representative in Legislative District 34 in Rapid City. “Once again, I ask the people of Rapid City for their vote and support,” Derby said. “Since District 34 is where I grew up, having attended Meadowbrook Grade School, West Junior High and Stevens High School, it has been a humbling experience to represent District 34 in the South Dakota Legislature.”

Derby will be the Lead Co-Chair of the Joint Committee on Appropriations (JCA), Chair of the House Committee on Appropriations and Member of the Revenue Projection Subcommittee for the 2026 General Session. “Co-Chairing the JCA is an honor,” Derby said. “During the 2025 Session, we balanced the State Budget for the 136th year in a row by including $70 million in cuts to Executive Branch agencies.” Derby has also served on the Select Committee on Legislative Relationships with Ellsworth Air Force Base. He is currently on the Visit Rapid City Board of Directors, the State of South Dakota and Rapid City America 250 Committee, and just finished his 26th year as a volunteer for SD Junior Achievement.

Derby’s reliable presence in Pierre utilizes his experience as a Rapid City business owner and community leader. Elevate Rapid City recently named him as a Pro-Business Champion. Derby said, “Continuity of leadership for West River and Rapid City is critical. We have a seat at the table and an effective voice when important decisions are made. My ultimate goal is to be a tireless advocate for our next generation and leave South Dakota a better place for our children and grandchildren.”

Rep. Derby can be reached at 605-381-0992 or mike.derby@sdlegislature.gov. Follow Rep. Derby at mikederbyforsdhouse.com and Facebook at Mike Derby for SD House District 34.

# # #

South Dakota rated in high risk category for recession. A good thing for the NIMBY’s to keep in mind.

According to Mark Zandi, the Chief Economist at Moody’s Analytics:

Nearly one-third of national GDP is produced in states that are either in recession or at high risk of entering one. These regions, spread across every part of the country, are showing signs of strain. Another third of states are treading water, while the rest are still growing, though their momentum is fading.

This is an update to an assessment I posted over a month ago, and is based on looking at a wide range of data. To determine whether a state is in or close to recession, I apply the definition of recession used by the business cycle dating committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research, namely, a broad-based, persistent decline in economic activity. Admittedly, the government shutdown and the loss of economic data from the federal government is complicating this assessment.

Read the entire economic forecast here.

And South Dakota is towards the top of that list. Of the 50 states, according to the story and the chart provided, the author notes that South Dakota has the 7th weakest economy in the NATION.

Why is this worth paying attention to? After spiking things like the ethanol pipeline related projects, the NIMBY crowd is refocusing on new projects to kill which would contribute to community economic activity. Such as data centers.

Interestingly, North Dakota – who will end up with the GEVO plant we lost – appears to be recession proof. Nebraska, a key location for carbon capture pipelines, primarily through Tallgrass Energy’s Trailblazer Pipeline, which transports captured CO2 from ethanol plants in Nebraska and Iowa to underground storage in Wyoming, they have green-light economies as well.   But right between them in South Dakota? We’re not looking so good.

Any political candidate who isn’t focused on re-firing the economic engine that South Dakota used to be may find themselves paying for it at the ballot box.   The next election isn’t about Not-In-My-Backyard politics as much as it’s going to be about reinvigorating the land of opportunity in what is already planned to be a hard economy for South Dakota.

Sioux Falls School Board weighs in on Governor’s Budget Address encouraging investment in public education

The Sioux Falls School Board has posted a public letter on their website in response to the Governor’s Budget address expressing their concern with the zero percent increase in educational funding proposed for the next legislative session, and their belief that the State of South Dakota should be investing in Public Education:

Governor Larry Rhoden offered an encouraging message during his Budget Address on December 2, 2025 when he said cutting education “isn’t the way.” As members of the Sioux Falls School Board, we appreciate his recognition that workforce, safety, and freedom all depend on strong schools. In that same spirit, we want to outline a clear vision for K–12 public education in South Dakota and place our district’s needs within the context of the decisions facing the Legislature this session.

Public education is not a line item in the budget. It is the infrastructure that keeps South Dakota strong, safe, and free. More than ninety percent of South Dakota’s children attend public schools, and those students become the workers, tradespeople, healthcare providers, business owners, and civic leaders who make our state succeed. A high school graduate is more than three times less likely to be incarcerated than someone without a diploma. Education is not just an expense, it is our most effective investment in public safety strategy and the foundation of workforce development.

For those reasons, we appreciate the Governor’s statement that slashing healthcare, education, and public safety is not the path to property tax relief. We support exploring better options. But solutions require clarity about the actual conditions facing public schools. District budgets do not rise and fall neatly with revenue curves. Even in years of flat enrollment, our costs increase with inflation, special education mandates, transportation needs, competitive salaries, insurance, curriculum materials, and school security demands. These obligations do not shrink simply because more children were born ten years ago.

It is important to speak plainly about the narrative surrounding homeschooling growth. The Governor highlighted a 216% increase in homeschooling. That percentage sounds dramatic, but it is mathematically inflated because it begins from a very small base. The truth is simple and steady: public education continues to serve the overwhelming majority of South Dakota’s children and families. More than nine out of ten South Dakotans still attend public schools, and we continue to educate the full spectrum of students, English learners, children with disabilities, students experiencing homelessness, students fleeing trauma, and students whose needs are growing more complex each year.

The real issue is not how much homeschooling has grown; the real issue is where public dollars are going, and whether all schools that receive public dollars are subject to public accountabilityPublic schools are bound by law to educate every child, without exception. We must report academic outcomes, comply with civil rights laws, follow open meetings and open records requirements, undergo routine audits, administer state assessments, meet accreditation standards, and show the public exactly how every tax dollar is spent. Our classrooms are transparent. Our governance is public. Our results are measurable.

Private schools and homeschool programs receiving public support are not required to meet these standards. They may refuse admittance, limit enrollment, or opt out of serving students with disabilities or English learners. They do not report achievement data, do not follow the same financial transparency rules, and are not accountable to elected boards. When public dollars support institutions that are not required to serve all children and are not required to open their books to taxpayers, we create an uneven system and risk diminishing the stability of the public schools that educate nearly every child in the state.

Public dollars require public accountability. South Dakotans deserve the assurance that every taxpayer-supported educational entity is meeting basic standards of quality, transparency, and fairness. Only public schools currently meet that standard. We also want to clarify an important point regarding school funding statutes. SDCL 13-13-10.1 requires that public schools receive an annual increase of inflation or three percent, whichever is less. The law does not allow the state to average increases across multiple years, nor does it tie public school inflationary adjustments to the funding circumstances of unrelated departments. When the Consumer Price Index is three percent, the law requires three percent. This consistency is essential for districts to meet rising costs and maintain competitive teacher salaries in a highly constrained labor market. When the Legislature provides 1.25% or the 0% the Governor presented, they are not following the law they made. Don’t they need to follow their own laws?

We acknowledge and appreciate the Governor’s investments in technical education, particularly at Southeast Technical College. These one-time and ongoing commitments will strengthen our workforce pipeline. But those investments depend on a strong K–12 foundation. Technical colleges cannot thrive without public schools preparing the students who will later fill those programs. A comprehensive vision for South Dakota’s future workforce must begin with K–12 public education.

There has been discussion about the state’s rainy day fund. South Dakota now holds reserves of 12.5%, significantly above the historic benchmark of 10%. Legislative budget leaders have noted that returning to 10% could free up approximately $70 million without compromising fiscal stability. This is the kind of responsible conversation worth having as we look for pathways to property tax relief that do not undermine long-term educational well-being or violate statutory obligations to schools.

What remains missing from the statewide conversation is a clear vision for K–12 public education. Public schools are more than classrooms; they are economic engines, safety nets, and community anchors. They develop the human capital upon which our entire state economy depends. At a moment when South Dakota is debating significant policy changes affecting school funding, school choice, and property taxes, it is critical that public education be seen and protected as essential statewide infrastructure.

As members of the Sioux Falls Education Board, we respectfully ask the Governor and Legislature to work with us in the following ways:

    • Uphold the statutory inflationary increase required by law.

    • Ensure any school receiving public dollars meets basic standards of academic reporting and fiscal transparency.

    • Protect local control so districts can respond to community needs.

    • Avoid policies that penalize districts for responsible budgeting when revenue forecasting remains volatile.

    • Treat public K-12 education with the same strategic importance as post-secondary education and public safety.

    • Engage public school leaders as partners in budget and tax policy discussions.

We offer this response in a spirit of partnership. Our goals are the same: a strong, safe, prosperous South Dakota built on the promise of opportunity for every child. Public schools are fulfilling that mission every day. We ask the Governor to continue protecting and strengthening the schools that educate the vast majority of South Dakota’s children and that anchor the future of our state.

The Sioux Falls School District is the largest district in the state representing over 25,000 students, with a staff count of about 3275 employees.

Doeden claims Hansen team in talks to join his dumpster fire.

I notice Toby Doeden is on Twitter tonight claiming that Gubernatorial candidate Jon Hansen’s people are in talks with his for Hansen to fall in line and follow:

Toby’s not very subtle public message to Hansen notes  “All well intended members of the grassroots movement, including Jon, know that joining forces is the right thing to do.”

Toby presuming he knows what “the grassroots movement” thinks is kind of a bold statement, considering that Toby voted in his first Republican primary – ever – in 2024, just this last year. (Unless flying to GOP dinners in his jet has infused him with a unique sense of commonality.)

But, let’s also consider that Hansen has spent the last several years doing what Leslie Unruh tells him to do.  So, handing his leash over to Toby wouldn’t really be much of a change in routine.

Stay tuned. Maybe our Christmas miracle will be they both drop out.