KELOland news is reporting that State Senator Tom Pischke has asked for a jury trial on his charges of election fraud. As if that’s going to somehow get him off of the charges against him for trying to do sneaky crap by falsifying election forms?
Tom Pischke, a Republican Senator for District 25, appeared at the Minnehaha County Courthouse for an arraignment hearing Tuesday morning, where his attorney entered a not guilty plea.
and..
Pischke is facing two charges of offering a false or forged instrument for filing. Pischke is accused of forging precinct committeeman or committeewoman statement forms, a felony offense.
and..
A jury trial is scheduled for early December. Minnehaha County State’s Attorney Daniel Haggar will represent the state.
Young Mr. Pischke likes attention. It is why he acted out in school.
….but Hunter Biden’s laptop…..
Good for him. Innocent until proven guilty. Public opinion means nothing. The state has to prove, beyond a shadow of doubt, meaning one person doubting the states evidence, proves him innocent. Unless they have his face and the actual envelope in the picture this can and should be all disproved. Good luck Tom!
One person doubting the state’s evidence does not prove him innocent. It just means a hung jury and a potential retrial.
Also, it’s “beyond a reasonable doubt” not “shadow of a doubt,” two different things. And “not guilty” does not mean “innocent.”
They have his signature which has characteristics that are replicated across the forged signatures. They will match every one of those forged signatures to his handwriting, just like they do a bullet to a gun. Tom is screwed and taking this to trial is a waste of time and resources. He wants the attention like all m a g a t s who won’t take responsibility for their actions.
Your post Would’ve been more believable if you said liberals and conservatives take responsibility for their actions!I
liberals lol!
RLTW
lol name five times Trump has apologized without trying to blame someone else GI Jane.
Considering you’re a coward who never served ,
I wouldn’t expect anything else from a liberal!
I said Name one politician ( on either side ) whoever took responsibility.
RLTW
How many years did Lt. Bone Spurs serve?
Lets go Steve!
Or so they say. We’ll see. The state can claim literally anything without any proof. Literally lie and there are no consequences. So yeah, take it to trial. Good for him. Go Tom.
Disproved? What does that mean in this context? Your post approaches word salad at times.
And Tom continues to waste his county’s resources.
Maybe Aunt Jemima will save him.
Daniel Haggar is taking this himself. He wouldn’t do that if he thought it was anything less than a slam dunk case. Go Daniel!
That’s not saying a lot about Daniel then
This should have been the standard decades ago.
Here are the minimum sentencing guidlines to make it real.
Ten years minimum plus one month for every fraudulent ballot found, counted or not, for each person involved. No less. No parole. Any one elected and anyone they may have hired after fraudulent ballots are found to have won that election and are immediatly removed from office and a special election will follow in less than two months to re-do the fraudulent election. The personsconvicted of the fraud will pay for that election. Any judge that refuses to see the evidence will be immediately disbarred and removed from the bench for life. If the evidence that judge refused to see leads to a conviction then that judge will be given the same sentenece. All court room proceding willl be televised, no judge has the authority to censor information from the public. Any misconduct by that judge will resualt in that judge being removed form the bench and held to the same sentence as the convicted. Judges are not above the law, particularly leftist activst in black robes, and it time they started rembering that.
Tell me you didn’t vote for trump
Tom, that’s a very interesting perspective. Thanks for your insights.
looks like the wrong guy figured out that you don’t have to pay child support when youre in prison.
“baby mommas HATE this one trick!!!”
I remember Dr Bosworth’s trial. A cook from a Hutterite colony was called and asked if she had actually signed Dr Boz’s nomination petition and testified she had not. I think one of the colony leaders had forged her signature. Was that person ever prosecuted?
The only way Pischke can get out of this is if the people whose signatures are on those petitions testify that those are, indeed, their signatures, if they think they can get away with perjury.
Has he been talking to them? Oops!
If he tells people to lie, it could lead to a subornation of perjury charge. South Dakota would charge him as though he committed the perjury himself. That aint happening.
Lets not forget about witness tampering.
He’s not bright enough to come up with his whole sham on his own. Whatever came of the other dna found on the envelopes?
If Dr Boz can do it, why not Tom Pischke?
It’s not complicated.