South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem on dictating vaccine policy.

5 thoughts on “South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem on dictating vaccine policy.”

  1. For what it’s worth, I like that the governor is pushing back and milking the brain trust for the strongest arguments.

    I posted three replies, will repost here in case I’m shadow banned (can someone verify if my comments are visible on Governor Noem’s twitter?):

    1.
    It is NOT a vaccine. It is an experimental MRNA spike protein (genetic) therapy that DOES NOT WORK. You DO have the ability to spur the prosecution for assault and murder, conspiracy to commit assault/murder (or negligent homicide). The shots don’t work as advertised.

    2.
    We have unprecedented corporate power usurping the power of government. Creative solutions do not have to flow through government. To the extent you’re able, interface with the private sector to come up with another solution that does not sacrifice our front line workers.

    3.
    Let’s differentiate between mandating harm and mandating protection from harm.

    1. EVEN Noems twitter recognizes lies and dangerous ignorance… THe lies of you people have been responsible for an estimated 130,000 Americans and you have the gall to slobber something about—-“assault and murder, conspiracy to commit assault/murder (or negligent homicide). “— “Let’s differentiate between mandating harm and mandating protection from harm.”— WTF is wrong with you?

    2. John Dale the shots work. It doesn’t seem to matter how many times you are told this.
      And it is a “vaccine” in the 21st century use of the word.
      It doesn’t contain any component of the vaccinia virus, but it does use the surface proteins of the coronavirus as antigens. This is the same way flu shots are made, using surface proteins.

      But it doesn’t seem to matter how many times this is brought to your attention, you continue to spread misinformation. Why? Are you that desperate for attention? Is somebody paying you to spread manure? What are you getting out of this?

  2. Not necessarily, since given the constitutional distinction between state and national government it’s totally possible for the Governor of South Dakota can be empowered in ways the President of the United States isn’t. Though I admit it’s unlikely in regards to this particular power. And what she said’s good enough for Twitter I guess

Comments are closed.