Guest Column: Critical Race Theory is not the basis for instruction at South Dakota’s universities, and it is not going to be

Critical Race Theory is not the basis for instruction at South Dakota’s universities, and it is not going to be
by Tony Venhuizen, South Dakota Board of Regents

Earlier this week, the South Dakota Board of Regents adopted an “Opportunity for All” plan that included a statement of values, framed around four tenants: (1) offering opportunity for all students; (2) proudly supporting the United States of America; (3) safeguarding the rich tradition of American universities; and (4) offering curriculum based upon widely held and accepted knowledge and thought.

As a Regent, I offered my thoughts about this action during our meeting, because I think we need to be very clear:  Critical Race Theory is not the basis for instruction at South Dakota’s universities, and it is not going to be.

But our action is not simply banning a label, because if you follow this issue, you know that the label means different things to different people – it’s a shifting definition. (We have seen that again in the responses from the governor’s critics to her statement in support of the Regents action.) What the Board passed is a statement of the positive values that will guide us going forward.

I want to take a step back, though, and look back to the 1950s, and the early years of the Cold War.

Higher Education played an important role in winning the Cold War. Why? Because it was a place that taught American ideals, that encouraged academic freedom and discovery, and that encouraged breakthroughs in technology.  That’s how we won the Cold War.  Our ideology, our economy, our technology, and our system of individual liberty were superior to the Soviet system.  Universities were not neutral observers.  They were part of the effort to defeat Soviet Communism in the world.

Although America and our allies won the Cold War, though, we have not reached the end of history. The United States has a new rival: China. President Biden described in a May 28, 2021 speech the challenge that our nation faces.  Here is what the President said:

[W]e’re in a battle between democracies and autocracies.  The more complicated the world becomes, the more difficult it is for democracies to come together and reach consensus…  [President Xi of China] firmly believes that China, before the year [2030 or 2035], is going to own America because autocracies can make quick decisions.

But America is unique.  From all nations in the world, we’re the only nation organized based on an idea.  Every other nation you can define by their ethnicity, their geography, their religion, except America.  America is born out of an idea: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men [and women] are created equal… endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights, [including] Life, Liberty, [and the pursuit of happiness].

None of you get your rights from your government; you get your rights merely because you’re a child of God.  The government is there to protect those God-given rights.  No other government has been based on that notion.  No one can defeat us except us.

I share that statement from the President because, if you are in a university in China today, you’re not going to learn about any of that.  You are not going to learn about the Maoist purges.  You are not going to learn about Tiananmen Square. You are not going to learn about the current genocide being undertaken against the Uyghur people – both the Trump and Biden administrations have called it a genocide. You are not going to learn any of it.

In an American university, you are going to learn about all of that, and you are also going to learn about our own country’s history and our failures and mistakes. Keep in mind, though: the Uyghur genocide is not in the past. It is happening in China, today. The crackdown on democracy in Hong Kong is happening, today.  And the President of the United States is telling us that our nation that the next ten or fifteen years will decide which system is going to win in the world, the American system or the Chinese system.

Our university students need to know that, and they need to learn why it matters.  They need to learn that it makes a big difference which system wins.  They need to understand that we cannot be neutral observers in this conflict.  America needs to win.  That is why I supported the passage of the Regents statement.

Tony Venhuizen, Sioux Falls, holds a bachelor’s degree from South Dakota State University and a law degree from the University of South Dakota. He previously served as the Board of Regents’ student member in 2003-2008, appointed three times by Gov. Mike Rounds. Prior to his current employment with Standard Trust Company, Venhuizen served as chief of staff in the administrations of Gov. Kristi Noem and Gov. Dennis Daugaard.

8 thoughts on “Guest Column: Critical Race Theory is not the basis for instruction at South Dakota’s universities, and it is not going to be”

  1. I attended a major university from 1994 until 2005. I earned a Bachelor of Philosophy and a Computer Science Minor, a Master of Science in Management Information Systems from the nation’s current #1 program, and the Concentration in Entrepreneurship from the nation’s former #1 program. I worked as a GA at the Arizona Remote Sensing Center, as an Application Systems Analyst and Application Systems Analyst Sr. at The Water Resources Research Center and the Department of Ag and Resource Economics, respectively. For years, I then worked as an independent contractor for Ag/Econ. All of this was at The University of Arizona.

    Despite there being some very conservative people trying to survive in that environment (me being one), I learned that the administrative tier at this University and every other university in The United States (likely) is a revolving door of water-carrying globalists who chase foreign money and grants while subjugating their research outcomes to an anti-American agenda.

    I presume this is true of South Dakota’s universities as well.

    We need normal people put in charge of Universities. One of the things Trump did that was very good was removing some of the credential requirements for job applications in the federal government. We have a serious leadership problem at our universities. If you’re not a globalist shill, you don’t get accepted into PhD programs, and therefore have no chance at these leadership positions.


    We have to break the glass box around university leadership to ferret out the depth of the malfeasance against the interests of the republic for which the universities are charged to empower!

  2. I think there is a very good argument for the universities being lead not by captured administrators, but by public commissions; a type of academic congress.

  3. He’s spot on. I’m glad to know our universities aren’t following the coastal crazies down the CRT path.

  4. Tony knows the problem and has the brains to find a solution.

    I hope his colleagues do or will listen to him

  5. So Mr. Dale, given all of your touting accomplishments above…what the hell happened to you?

    1. I am wondering this too, I’ve seen his resume posted to the comment sections here many times. LOL

  6. I just read this again.

    Contains much wisdom and awareness. I applaud Tony for taking on this monumental endeavor as it is clear he knows what he is getting into. Godspeed

Comments are closed.